California Proposal (here we go again)

Spinal Tap

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
769
769
93
New bill forthcoming providing revenue sharing for college athletes. Pretty long so I'll put the first part up and then the link:

A California lawmaker introduced a bill Thursday that would reshape how college athletic departments in the state are required to share their earnings with athletes.

The proposed legislation, named the College Athlete Protection Act, calls for major money-generating college sports teams to create a fund that would pay players a share of their teams' annual revenue, a portion of which would be held in a trust for players until they complete their degree. The bill also proposes creating a 21-member, state-run panel that regulates the ways in which schools are pouring resources into protecting and educating their athletes.

Chris Holden, a former San Diego State basketball player and the current chairman of the state legislature's appropriations committee, announced the bill at a news conference in front of the Rose Bowl Stadium on Thursday afternoon.

"Through the years, college athlete concerns have been overlooked because they are not in the professional leagues," Holden said in a statement provided to ESPN. "If colleges are profiting on their players, then these students deserve equitable pathways for their careers whether that is in the professional league or in California's workforce."

The revenue-sharing portion of the bill seeks to create "fair market value compensation" for athletes. To do so, Holden's bill includes a formula designed to ensure that half of the revenue generated by each college team is dedicated to its athletes either through grant-in-aid scholarship dollars or in revenue-sharing payments.

For example, if the San Diego State basketball team generates roughly $6 million in revenue and spends roughly $500,000 on scholarships for its players, the school would have to set aside $2.5 million at the end of the year (half of the total revenue minus the cost of scholarships) for the players if the new bill becomes law.

Players would be eligible to receive up to $25,000 in annual payments at the end of their season, and any additional money would be held in a trust until they graduate. For the most profitable college teams in California, this formula could lead to hundreds of thousands of dollars paid to players who get their degrees.

 

Harvard Gamecock

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2022
2,284
2,152
113
Do not fail to turn your attention to this one sentence.

pay players a share of their teams' annual revenue, a portion of which would be held in a trust for players until they complete their degree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cocky Jeff

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
7,048
7,345
113
Do not fail to turn your attention to this one sentence.

pay players a share of their teams' annual revenue, a portion of which would be held in a trust for players until they complete their degree.
They should amend that to read "all of which".
 
  • Like
Reactions: will110

Irvin Snibbley

Active member
Mar 24, 2022
425
300
63
"until they get their degree"....... One lawsuit away from disappearing......The way the courts have consistently ruled I doubt t would stand up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maxcy

Atlanta Cock

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
745
749
93
New bill forthcoming providing revenue sharing for college athletes. Pretty long so I'll put the first part up and then the link:

A California lawmaker introduced a bill Thursday that would reshape how college athletic departments in the state are required to share their earnings with athletes.

The proposed legislation, named the College Athlete Protection Act, calls for major money-generating college sports teams to create a fund that would pay players a share of their teams' annual revenue, a portion of which would be held in a trust for players until they complete their degree. The bill also proposes creating a 21-member, state-run panel that regulates the ways in which schools are pouring resources into protecting and educating their athletes.

Chris Holden, a former San Diego State basketball player and the current chairman of the state legislature's appropriations committee, announced the bill at a news conference in front of the Rose Bowl Stadium on Thursday afternoon.

"Through the years, college athlete concerns have been overlooked because they are not in the professional leagues," Holden said in a statement provided to ESPN. "If colleges are profiting on their players, then these students deserve equitable pathways for their careers whether that is in the professional league or in California's workforce."

The revenue-sharing portion of the bill seeks to create "fair market value compensation" for athletes. To do so, Holden's bill includes a formula designed to ensure that half of the revenue generated by each college team is dedicated to its athletes either through grant-in-aid scholarship dollars or in revenue-sharing payments.

For example, if the San Diego State basketball team generates roughly $6 million in revenue and spends roughly $500,000 on scholarships for its players, the school would have to set aside $2.5 million at the end of the year (half of the total revenue minus the cost of scholarships) for the players if the new bill becomes law.

Players would be eligible to receive up to $25,000 in annual payments at the end of their season, and any additional money would be held in a trust until they graduate. For the most profitable college teams in California, this formula could lead to hundreds of thousands of dollars paid to players who get their degrees.

Typical Cali. Sounds like socialism. Makes sense and sounds fair on paper. Doesn’t work in the real world. Non-revenue sports and unpopular women’s sports would disappear.

College should remain amateur. It’s supposed to be light and fun. Let the pro sports create minor leagues. Beisbol and basketball already have it.
 

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
7,048
7,345
113
Typical Cali. Sounds like socialism. Makes sense and sounds fair on paper. Doesn’t work in the real world. Non-revenue sports and unpopular women’s sports would disappear.

College should remain amateur. It’s supposed to be light and fun. Let the pro sports create minor leagues. Beisbol and basketball already have it.
No, they'll expect the schools to pay the players as employees and continue to fund everything. That's how they roll. If they deny non-revenue people employee status, that will draw a lawsuit which the schools will inevitably lose.
 

BetaLiberalCock1

Active member
Oct 22, 2022
510
453
63
New bill forthcoming providing revenue sharing for college athletes. Pretty long so I'll put the first part up and then the link:

A California lawmaker introduced a bill Thursday that would reshape how college athletic departments in the state are required to share their earnings with athletes.

The proposed legislation, named the College Athlete Protection Act, calls for major money-generating college sports teams to create a fund that would pay players a share of their teams' annual revenue, a portion of which would be held in a trust for players until they complete their degree. The bill also proposes creating a 21-member, state-run panel that regulates the ways in which schools are pouring resources into protecting and educating their athletes.

Chris Holden, a former San Diego State basketball player and the current chairman of the state legislature's appropriations committee, announced the bill at a news conference in front of the Rose Bowl Stadium on Thursday afternoon.

"Through the years, college athlete concerns have been overlooked because they are not in the professional leagues," Holden said in a statement provided to ESPN. "If colleges are profiting on their players, then these students deserve equitable pathways for their careers whether that is in the professional league or in California's workforce."

The revenue-sharing portion of the bill seeks to create "fair market value compensation" for athletes. To do so, Holden's bill includes a formula designed to ensure that half of the revenue generated by each college team is dedicated to its athletes either through grant-in-aid scholarship dollars or in revenue-sharing payments.

For example, if the San Diego State basketball team generates roughly $6 million in revenue and spends roughly $500,000 on scholarships for its players, the school would have to set aside $2.5 million at the end of the year (half of the total revenue minus the cost of scholarships) for the players if the new bill becomes law.

Players would be eligible to receive up to $25,000 in annual payments at the end of their season, and any additional money would be held in a trust until they graduate. For the most profitable college teams in California, this formula could lead to hundreds of thousands of dollars paid to players who get their degrees.

No.

Whatever it is > No.
 

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,258
1,668
113
Do not fail to turn your attention to this one sentence.

pay players a share of their teams' annual revenue, a portion of which would be held in a trust for players until they complete their degree.
Then paying off people to "complete their degrees" will become a racket in itself.
 

Cocky Jeff

Joined Jan 30, 2003
Jan 22, 2022
6,260
11,810
113
I’ll still argue they are getting a free education. Plus “meal” money. How much are those educations worth now? Make sure you figure 5 years for most, not four.
 

Harvard Gamecock

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2022
2,284
2,152
113
Then paying off people to "complete their degrees" will become a racket in itself.