Calipari's surprisingly complex offensive sets vs. Mizzou

pascat

Senior
Aug 19, 2003
14,380
652
0
Kentucky ran approximately 40 plays versus Missouri that could unambiguously be called half court offensive sets. Because Missouri spent only about 3 minutes in a 2-3 zone and the rest of the game in a 2-1-2 zone, last night's contest gave us a great opportunity to study UK's strategy against a "pack it in zone" going forward.Mind you, this was Missouri, but it still gave us the same schematic sets. After studying each set thoroughly, I am very pleased with what I saw. Cal is patently NOT simply rolling the ball out there; UK has at least 20 different looks against this version of the zone and 35/40 possessions were run very smoothly. Calipari is clearly preparing them for March.

Some observations:

(1) UK's basic offensive set is the same for both platoons: Andrew or Ulis dribbles to the right side with Towns/Cauley or Johnson coming immediately to the high post to set a screen to the PG's left side. The shooter (Aaron or Booker) stands mostly still on the high left wing, the strongside wing (Hawkins or Lyles on the right) runs baseline to whichever side the ball is on, and the other PF (Cauley Stein or Lee) plays weak side mid post, switching to the opposite side depending on where the ball is. It's basically a four man game with the shooter playing a kind of offensive safety. If the play breaks down, he is the primary defender on the fast break. If the offense penetrates, he waits for a kick out.

This basic set creates all sorts of matchup problems, but the most important one happens right away with the PG, who has the option to play the screen and head left, drawing the shooter's defender in and exposing him for a 3. Or, if he beats his own man to the right, it leaves the high post open in the lane or draws the strong side wing's defender in, leaving the right wing open.

This set also is ideal for both Andrew and Ulis, because you can use either strength or quickness to get by the initial defender.

Kentucky ran no less than 10 variations of this basic set against Missouri, with lots of nuances and little hitches that will be much fun to watch as they players feel more comfortable in it.

(2) UK only runs weakside "Jeff Sheppard off the ball screens" for two players: Booker and Aaron, and Booker gets twice as many as Aaron.

(3) If the high post player receives the ball and then passes to a guard, he immediately sets a screen for that guard.

(4) All guard passes into the post result in that guard going to the baseline three point line. This clears the way for the post player who just received the ball to avoid a double team, and leaves the kick out for three open for the wing who just passed the ball. Remember Dakari's nice move in the second half? That was made possible by Booker's entry pass and slide to the baseline.

(5) Ulis is more content to run the offense than Andrew, who is more keen to take advantages of weak spots in the defense and exploit them immediately. Andrew is very adept at spotting them, Ulissees them but is more risk averse.

(6) Calipari will occasionally use Cauley-Stein and Lee as guards on the perimeter at times, in order to create mismatches for the Harrison's down low.

(7) Almost all of Kentucky's dunks come from the weakside; either wings or bigs being freed up for alley-oops or offensive rebound dunks. There is very little a defense can do except stay at home and hope UK's guards miss short jumpers. Calipari takes advantage of defenses keeping their eyes on the ball and has his weakside players roam, sneak, and lurk. It is awesome.

(8) About 4-5 times, you could tell UK's players didn't know the offense and Ulis or Harrison had to buy time on the perimeter. To their credit, they didn't turn the ball over despite having nobody to pass to.

(9) Two times, Ulis patted his head, which signaled to the offense that they were running a high-low game. The post game forward and the wings went low and out. This "return to high school" set freed Ulis to dribble penetrate and kick. It seems to be the white platoon's safety valve play.

(10) When we started hitting 3's, Missouri extended the 2-1-2 defense, which opened up all sorts of holes for short jumpers. UK's players were a bit surprised with their opportunities in these situations, but handled themselves rather well. As the year goes on, they'll need to hesitate less though.

(11) UK's best shooter is the inbounds man, and after inbounding it, he immediately runs baseline through two screens to get open. It's a thing of beauty when it works.
 

TY U 2 WCS 4 9

Redshirt
Oct 14, 2014
62
0
0
Interesting breakdown pascat. The added work on offense is beginning to pay off. Guys are definitely accepting their roles and keeping spaceing a lot better because of it. Cal is a master. The assistants are amazing too.
 

youkcatz

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2007
1,610
108
0
I'm no basketball guru, but I did notice that the offensive sets were much more active and complicated. I also noticed that they got the ball into the post more frequently. This opens up the offense.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
Originally posted by YOUKCATZ:
I'm no basketball guru, but I did notice that the offensive sets were much more active and complicated. I also noticed that they got the ball into the post more frequently. This opens up the offense.
This. Andrew drove to the foul line and hit a pull up jumper early in the game. I have been wanting to see that part of his game for over a year. Sadly, I never saw it again last night.
 

BlueCat43

Senior
Sep 21, 2010
12,743
486
0
Cal said in the presser that he let them play more random today against the zone. I think this more "organic" approach suits this team as it lets them create using their talent and isn't something that can be gameplanned against.
 

Sithlyone

All-Conference
Apr 12, 2012
2,086
1,501
0
You know, I really don't know what Cal means when he says that UK fans watch more film than he does...



NICE breakdown. I really loved it. I too noticed the offensive schemes. I didn't pick up on all the nuances but did see some of what you pointed out. Thanks for all of the hard work and skill.

One play that I really liked and think will be good later on is the in bounds play under the basket where Andrew rotated into the paint along the baseline through a screen and got the ball, it was set up perfectly and had not a last minute swat from the defender knocked the ball away it would have been an easy dunk or layup. It was a nice play and one that I can tell they work on often. It was the first time I noticed an in bounds play this season. (perhaps there have been more but I just missed them). Normally we just toss the ball in and set the play up.
 
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
12,185
0
Originally posted by pascat:
Cal is patently NOT simply rolling the ball out there.....
The mere mention of this is how you can tell someone is either an idiot or a hater. All evidence is to the contrary - the UMass '96 and UK '11 final four runs, the way his teams always, always understand and execute basic defensive play, etc. When I see someone allege that Cal simply rolls the balls out and isn't a great coach ("not a good coach, a great coach" to use Bilas' line about a former UK guy), then I know to disregard them and their opinions.

Sorry for the tangent, good post....
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Anthony Grant just read this OP, if we lose Saturday I blame you.


Good stuff though in all seriousness.
 

jarms24

All-American
Mar 31, 2010
92,715
7,926
0
Excellent post, pas! Noticed the "high-low" signal, but I didn't catch on to the other plays. You must be a coach, or just very observant!
 
Dec 12, 2007
68,157
14,860
0
Speaking of Ulis, I've noticed him several times this season moving guys where they should be, which is great to see from a freshman, non-starting PG.
 

Runt#1969

All-American
Dec 13, 2010
20,640
7,760
113
MODS delete this post. Too well written, concise, and easy to understand for even the most illiterate basketball fan. I urge you to edit your post and delet it immediately, PASCAT, as it was brilliant and could be forwarded to our opposition and get into the hands of coaches that could use it to help them formulate strategies against what we're doing.


SURE, I know that the coaches can run the game film and will figure this out themselves, but they get paid a lot of money to do that, don't make their life easier!!!


This is a great post, undeniably the post of the day, I nominate it for post of the year, but we've gotta be sure to delete it or edit it and delete the content (in its' brilliant entirety) before the opposition catches on !


Great job, Pascat !

Go Big Blue !
 

Phantom

All-Conference
Dec 7, 2005
6,335
2,052
0
Another thing I noticed a lot last night, which has been missing for awhile, is that fast pass out of the middle back outside. KAT was throwing them like fastballs last night. In the two game "tough stretch" it seemed like the bigs wanted to hold the ball more and try to dribble around inside the paint, rather than fire the ball back out.
 

GonzoCat90

Heisman
Mar 30, 2009
32,377
34,559
0
Wow, great post. That's probably the longest, most complex post I've ever actually read here because it was broken up well and explained clearly.

Interestingly enough, my dad and I were talking about the baseline clearout on the entry pass last night. When Dakari and Towns are scoring from the block, that's nearly unstoppable, as basic as it may be.
 

emmcat

Junior
Feb 4, 2004
1,564
227
0
Great great post ,very helpful.
The bigs handled the ball more last night. Some of our guys are better than others at feeding the post. Booker is really good. Andrew is good. Ulis is somewhat handicapped by his size and the fact that his defender plays farther off him or get burned by a blow by. It's harde to feed the post if your defender is two steps off you. No one plays two steps off Booker or his coach will bench him next time down court.
 

Joneslab

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2005
4,219
1,478
0
Tremendous job, pascat.

Thought Missouri's zone was way softer than the two we'd seen in the previous games. They were allowing us to get the ball to Dakari with ease. Not the case with Ole Miss and certainly not TAMU. TAMU would collapse in four guys on Johnson and Towns when they got it on the block.

Not sure why Missouri didn't go that route.
 

pascat

Senior
Aug 19, 2003
14,380
652
0
Thanks, guys. I wanted to add that I said "surprisingly complex" not as a knock on Cal, but as acknowledging that he does not use youth as an excuse when teaching this team. He expects a TON from these youngsters and they seem up to the task. I think we all knew Cal was a fine X's and O's coach. What I didn't know was how many looks he expects from these youngsters this early. It's not easy.

I wanted to also add that you will all get a much better appreciation for how difficult it is to be a point guard in Calipari's offense. I know we all probably suspect that Aaron is ahead of Andrew based on their offensive production, but if you watch the game tapes, Calipari expects WAY more from Andrew than he does Aaron on the offensive end. Aaron basically stands still for half of a possession; not because he's lazy, but because that's his role in the offense. Andrew, by contrast, is constantly reading the defense and waiting for the right moment to strike. He rubs off screens, dribble penetrates (something Cal's off guards rarely do), re-sets busted plays, be ready for the occasional 3, shift to the low post at times, etc.

All in all, Andrew has to at east double Aaron's work effort on the offensive side of the ball on every play. Watch the games closely and you'll see what kind of a special player Andrew is.

This post was edited on 1/14 2:13 PM by pascat
 

armchairpg

All-Conference
Oct 24, 2012
2,608
1,736
113
I actually caught some of what OP is referring to last night. I am usually not that good at seeing patterns on the court.

That said, I think last night it was easier to pick things out because they actually ran the stuff better than normal. If guys start a play and then get out of position or break off then it makes it harder for a lay person (like me) to see what is the play and what is the breakdown...at least without a lot of rewinding.

In any case, I think OP should do a post game analysis every game...would be fun and educational.
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
Originally posted by KyFaninNC:

Originally posted by YOUKCATZ:
I'm no basketball guru, but I did notice that the offensive sets were much more active and complicated. I also noticed that they got the ball into the post more frequently. This opens up the offense.
This. Andrew drove to the foul line and hit a pull up jumper early in the game. I have been wanting to see that part of his game for over a year. Sadly, I never saw it again last night.
But both twins shot balls that were in their comfort zone instead of forcing it. Good to see.
 

pascat

Senior
Aug 19, 2003
14,380
652
0
Originally posted by Poetax:
Originally posted by KyFaninNC:

Originally posted by YOUKCATZ:
I'm no basketball guru, but I did notice that the offensive sets were much more active and complicated. I also noticed that they got the ball into the post more frequently. This opens up the offense.
This. Andrew drove to the foul line and hit a pull up jumper early in the game. I have been wanting to see that part of his game for over a year. Sadly, I never saw it again last night.
But both twins shot balls that were in their comfort zone instead of forcing it. Good to see.
I loved seeing that too. It all depends on what the defense gives you. In Cal's offensive sets, it's going to be Harrison or Ulis that has access to that running pull-up jumper in the lane. And it will be available only if

(1) They detect that defender is anticipating being screened more than playing them straight up, in which case they blow right by
(2) They use the high post screen and the wing's defender and the post's defender both stay home instead of switching to guard the penetrating Ulis or Harrison.

In other words, it is not a matter of UK drawing that play up more. Rather, it depends on if the defense is giving that to you. Mizzou's coach probably moved to a switching offense immediately after Harrison's shot.
 

reignof cats

Redshirt
Apr 4, 2012
5,163
24
0
Good post pascat. BBN stop kidding yourselves. EVERY coach in the sec is watching our games. I think they all know what plays we like to do. Knowing and able to stop it are 2 different things. By playing 2 platoons, this has got to create matchup problems for the other team. Run one play over and over until they can stop it. When they stop the main play, go to the 2nd option. It is interesting to see Cal running different plays for each platoon. Pascat do you notice any change of sets when the other team has to bring in subs? Our platoons have different strengths on the offensive end. You mentioned the plays Cal runs for Booker and Aaron. Cal also did this with Lamb. GBB
 

pascat

Senior
Aug 19, 2003
14,380
652
0
Originally posted by reignof cats:
Good post pascat. BBN stop kidding yourselves. EVERY coach in the sec is watching our games. I think they all know what plays we like to do. Knowing and able to stop it are 2 different things. By playing 2 platoons, this has got to create matchup problems for the other team. Run one play over and over until they can stop it. When they stop the main play, go to the 2nd option. It is interesting to see Cal running different plays for each platoon. Pascat do you notice any change of sets when the other team has to bring in subs? Our platoons have different strengths on the offensive end. You mentioned the plays Cal runs for Booker and Aaron. Cal also did this with Lamb. GBB
I agree. Knowing and stopping it are two very different things. Take Oregon's offense, for example. I know Ohio State just beat them, but most teams were steamrolled by Oregon even though Oregon tells you exactly what they're doing on each play.

Calipari is very similar. He takes what the defense gives them. He instructs his players to run a few basic offenses, but in that are endlessly complex variations of this that he players can utilize depending on the situation.

What I mean is, Cal's offenses are complex, but they are first and foremost about reacting instinctually to what a defense gives you. This is why he likes his player splaying fast and loose. What ends up happening on film looks very complex, but only after the fact. That's why I said that there were no less than 20 different looks UK ran on 40 plays last night.

I don't think Calipari worries too much about specific players on the defensive side of the ball when UK has the ball. Sometimes he'll notice when one player is getting dominated, such as when Ulis was getting bullied by Ole Miss's guards, but he usually wants UK to just do their thing. I also notice that he insists on feeding the post against shorter teams, like we saw last night. I think this is what Cal means when he says "I don't worry about the opponent." He doesn't, at least on offense.
 

hotelblue

Heisman
Jul 6, 2006
41,683
13,121
0
i agree bkh. that we have a nuanced set against a zone is encouraging. i'm sure there are variations for the weak side wing/post player in this set but we know call will want to keep them close to the basket. especially when they collapse and leave our high post guy wide open for fifteen footers. the tougher lyles gets the more we're going to clean up. he's getting rebounds but you know what i mean. in this set we had ap lurking weak side.
 

jackcarlson

Senior
Jan 6, 2011
2,006
647
0
very good post. I noticed some of those things last night. and our spacing was good.

don't worry too much about tipping off opposing coaches. even if you know what UK is doing, it doesn't mean that you can stop it!