Suckreocrity! .
You keep repeating this term Buck and it will end up in Webster's. Just hope an image of our team isnt next to it...
Suckreocrity! .
You keep repeating this term Buck and it will end up in Webster's. Just hope an image of our team isnt next to it...
I agree. Don't see us threatening in Tuscaloosa, but I'm eager to see what kind of showing we make. After that, only U of L, maybe UT look daunting. Still trying to figure out UT. Frankly, I see us as being in a season where young talented players can make a lot of progress, especially on defense. I'll tell you what I really think of our chances against our remaining opponents closer to each kick off. 6-6? Maybe. Hell, MAYBE 7-5 still. However, 5-7 looks more likely than the two put together, if you are laying money. I will have a better idea, win or lose, after Saturday. Time to find out if this team really has found a backbone.I feel like we pretty much controlled the game not squeaked. We also lost the turnover battle and still ran the ball down usc throats. I agree with the op i think this team has lots of upside considering the youth on defense
So Vandy got better but USC has not?
Read more carefully. I said beat them easily. That isn't saying a blowout. I think the defense has improved enough to prevent the second half collapse from game 1 and the offense is playing much better as well.
I disagree with your entire premise. I still prefer optimism over your attitude. To each his own.Beating someone easily = blowout where I come from. Call it what you want, but what are you basing the defense has improved statement on? Because they held South Carolina to its season average? South Carolina (124) has the 5th worst offense in the FBS against Mississippi State (41), East Carolina (75), Vandy (102), and Kentucky (109). Anyone who thinks a game against South Carolina and their one-dimensional rookie QB signals a vast improvement on defense (and that's what it would take to beat USM easily), is fooling themselves.
I disagree with your entire premise. I still prefer optimism over your attitude. To each his own.
Your premise was not factual, it was supposition. You did list some stats that were factual however. Or to rephrase for you, your premise was not the relative ranking of 5 SEC teams.So you disagree with facts? I don't care how full you think your glass is, that is never a good idea.
Your premise was not factual, it was supposition. You did list some stats that were factual however. Or to rephrase for you, your premise was not the relative ranking of 5 SEC teams.
I feel like we pretty much controlled the game not squeaked. We also lost the turnover battle and still ran the ball down usc throats. I agree with the op i think this team has lots of upside considering the youth on defense
Lol, you obviously havent watched a Missouri game. Their offense looks like the Patriots compared to South Carolina and they get better each game. Not a chance to beat them or MSU. Vandy has gotten better, they beat WKU, who would prbly beat us. How can people say we have gotten so much better since the USM game but refuse to recognize Vandy has gotten better since their game vs USCjr? Id take Vandy over us. So yeah, id be kinda shocked if we get to 4 wins.
I definitely agree with you. These are all winnable games.Guys,
Call me crazy.... but I'm seeing 6 W's this year. Maybe it was a strong(er) defensive performance against a bad SC team or maybe it's the emergence of Benny as a strong compliment to Boom (I'm liking the "Thunder & Lightning" moniker) but I really think we can get to 6 this year and go bowling.
I'm counting the following games at wins.
1. Vandy
2. Miss St.
3. Missouri
4. Austin Peay
I think those are all very winnable games considering only one of them is on the road.
What say you CAT fans? Can we actually get to 6 and go bowling?
I'm starting to wonder if UGa at home might be more "winnable" that MizzU on the road.
Both will be tough - but we may have at least a punchers chance in both.
IF we take care of MSU - I like the fact that we have two decent chances (along with the AP game) to get to 6
Some us called this a while back even at 0-2.Guys,
Call me crazy.... but I'm seeing 6 W's this year. Maybe it was a strong(er) defensive performance against a bad SC team or maybe it's the emergence of Benny as a strong compliment to Boom (I'm liking the "Thunder & Lightning" moniker) but I really think we can get to 6 this year and go bowling.
I'm counting the following games at wins.
1. Vandy
2. Miss St.
3. Missouri
4. Austin Peay
I think those are all very winnable games considering only one of them is on the road.
What say you CAT fans? Can we actually get to 6 and go bowling?