great! more motivation for ED!
first of all i know these computer predictions mean nothing, but i am curious as to how they draw their conclusions. i checked the stats on Maxpreps for both Hibriten and ED. ED has more rushing ypg, more passing ypg, more passing td's, and more rushing td's. all of this with a considerably tougher SOS. i know Hibriten's defensive numbers "may" be a hair better, but thats with a weaker SOS. so how exactly do these computers reach their conclusions?grab your salt lick
Wallace -Rose Hill 28 Reidsville 27..................2A Finals
Hibriten 28 East Duplin 24......................2AA Finals
I think these computers are just freaking smart. LOLfirst of all i know these computer predictions mean nothing, but i am curious as to how they draw their conclusions. i checked the stats on Maxpreps for both Hibriten and ED. ED has more rushing ypg, more passing ypg, more passing td's, and more rushing td's. all of this with a considerably tougher SOS. i know Hibriten's defensive numbers "may" be a hair better, but thats with a weaker SOS. so how exactly do these computers reach their conclusions?
LOL good one. we'll see how smart they are Saturday!I think these computers are just freaking smart. LOL
The computer programs use extensive models using about every number you can imagine. They also rely heavily on "trends" which are very important, reflecting how a team is playing recently compared to its expected performances.first of all i know these computer predictions mean nothing, but i am curious as to how they draw their conclusions. i checked the stats on Maxpreps for both Hibriten and ED. ED has more rushing ypg, more passing ypg, more passing td's, and more rushing td's. all of this with a considerably tougher SOS. i know Hibriten's defensive numbers "may" be a hair better, but thats with a weaker SOS. so how exactly do these computers reach their conclusions?
im sure the computers have been wrong on more than one occassion. dont you think?The computer programs use extensive models using about every number you can imagine. They also rely heavily on "trends" which are very important, reflecting how a team is playing recently compared to its expected performances.
And they are a whole lot smarted than you or I. Never bet against them unless you just like giving away money!
Sure, its called an "upset"im sure the computers have been wrong on more than one occassion. dont you think?
Sure,
Sure, its called an "upset"![]()
well said!The biggest problem I have with computer predictions is HUMANS play the game. Emotions and highs and lows play a big part. But this is why we play the game it leaves no doubt........
But their is always that if's - ands - buts guy thobut in the end their is a WINNER AND A LOOSER the way it should be.
He will probably have WRH favored by 4 points.What saith Brian Simmons??
Yeah, this will be interesting. Simmons will probably have ED a very slight favorite but all others will have ED a decided underdog.Simmons would have ED by 1 as of now.
Yeah, this will be interesting. Simmons will probably have ED a very slight favorite but all others will have ED a decided underdog.
Chance for ED to give major bragging rights to Simmons!
I don't know his success rates but from what I have seen I would refer to his predictions before betting any money. He has a good track record from the times I have read his predictions.