Can we all agree . . .

The Dunedein

Junior
Aug 1, 2003
2,122
274
83
that the Mueller Report (minus proper redactions) needs to be released to the public? I can’t accept the conclusion of an Attorney General who wrote a 19-page memorandum before gaining the AG position that dismissed Mueller’s work before he even saw the report. Neither can i accept the Dems’ spin that the Mueller Report probably says this or that. I want to see the Report for myself and form my own conclusions. I am not willing to forfeit my right to form my own conclusions to the Repubs or the Dems or any talking heads on tv. The more either side tries to hide things from us, the more i think there is to hide.

What legitimate and credible reason would either side have for keeping the actual findings of fact (minus proper redactions) from the American public?
 
Jan 4, 2003
44,736
535
103
that the Mueller Report (minus proper redactions) needs to be released to the public? I can’t accept the conclusion of an Attorney General who wrote a 19-page memorandum before gaining the AG position that dismissed Mueller’s work before he even saw the report. Neither can i accept the Dems’ spin that the Mueller Report probably says this or that. I want to see the Report for myself and form my own conclusions. I am not willing to forfeit my right to form my own conclusions to the Repubs or the Dems or any talking heads on tv. The more either side tries to hide things from us, the more i think there is to hide.

What legitimate and credible reason would either side have for keeping the actual findings of fact (minus proper redactions) from the American public?
agreed......and if the report shows criminal activity by ANYONE, even the sacred hildebeast, they should be prosecuted
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
that the Mueller Report (minus proper redactions) needs to be released to the public? I can’t accept the conclusion of an Attorney General who wrote a 19-page memorandum before gaining the AG position that dismissed Mueller’s work before he even saw the report. Neither can i accept the Dems’ spin that the Mueller Report probably says this or that. I want to see the Report for myself and form my own conclusions. I am not willing to forfeit my right to form my own conclusions to the Repubs or the Dems or any talking heads on tv. The more either side tries to hide things from us, the more i think there is to hide.

What legitimate and credible reason would either side have for keeping the actual findings of fact (minus proper redactions) from the American public?

Completely agree. I honestly don't think the public ever sees the report. Congress will subpoena it and the WH will never provide it...even though they are saying it should be made public. This will be another trump says "100% he will testify to Muller under oath." The only thing the public will ever see is Barr's four-page letter.

So until the report is made public, any comment on this is really meaningless (as you have pointed out, whether it be the media or members of Congress). That's why the comments this weekend by some board members were amusing, to say the least.

I would love to see Mueller testify before Congress in a public setting. There are so many questions to be asked.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Not just the report, but the underlying evidence to support the claims, whichever directions they may lead.

I want to see FISC applications... all of them. I want to see Woods documents. I want to see 302's, altered or not. I want to know why our allies spied on American citizens for our government, I want to know if the UK truly did set up shop in Maryland. It's not a time to bury it, it's a time to clean it up.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
ITT will be butthurt libs that still have not accepted they have been lied to by their media.

 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
that the Mueller Report (minus proper redactions) needs to be released to the public? I can’t accept the conclusion of an Attorney General who wrote a 19-page memorandum before gaining the AG position that dismissed Mueller’s work before he even saw the report. Neither can i accept the Dems’ spin that the Mueller Report probably says this or that. I want to see the Report for myself and form my own conclusions. I am not willing to forfeit my right to form my own conclusions to the Repubs or the Dems or any talking heads on tv. The more either side tries to hide things from us, the more i think there is to hide.

What legitimate and credible reason would either side have for keeping the actual findings of fact (minus proper redactions) from the American public?
I don’t think Barr would be that crazy. Congress can get the report, or at least put him under oath. It would probably destroy Trump and certainly destroy Barr if he lied about the findings.

Dems need to focus their attention on finding leaders and honing their message.

If Obama allowed his DOJ to be weaponized, they need to find a way to rebuild in the wake of the destruction that is coming.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
lol...

the socialists on Twitter STILL WON'T let it go...

"does not exonerate him"

lol...

the TDS is sickening...
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Not just the report, but the underlying evidence to support the claims, whichever directions they may lead.

I want to see FISC applications... all of them. I want to see Woods documents. I want to see 302's, altered or not. I want to know why our allies spied on American citizens for our government, I want to know if the UK truly did set up shop in Maryland. It's not a time to bury it, it's a time to clean it up.
I think if these theories turn out to be true, most people left and right would agree. But it will take more than speculation from conservative media. People will unite behind truth and justice......even when passionately opposed politically
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
I think if these theories turn out to be true, most people left and right would agree. But it will take more than speculation from conservative media. People will unite behind truth and justice......even when passionately opposed politically

Dream on. Most of your peeps are upset that the president was not conspiring with Russia. The rest still don't believe it's true.
 
Jan 4, 2003
44,736
535
103
I don’t think Barr would be that crazy. Congress can get the report, or at least put him under oath. It would probably destroy Trump and certainly destroy Barr if he lied about the findings.

Dems need to focus their attention on finding leaders and honing their message.

If Obama allowed his DOJ to be weaponized, they need to find a way to rebuild in the wake of the destruction that is coming.
Dems need to focus on finding leaders and honing their message......well said but they better find a decent message
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
Completely agree. I honestly don't think the public ever sees the report. Congress will subpoena it and the WH will never provide it...even though they are saying it should be made public. This will be another trump says "100% he will testify to Muller under oath." The only thing the public will ever see is Barr's four-page letter.

So until the report is made public, any comment on this is really meaningless (as you have pointed out, whether it be the media or members of Congress). That's why the comments this weekend by some board members were amusing, to say the least.

I would love to see Mueller testify before Congress in a public setting. There are so many questions to be asked.

SOON!

IT'S MUELLER TIME!

BALLS IN A VICE!

COLLUSION!

LMAO! It's so fun to make fun of you. You are like a Marshall fan.
 

EERs 3:16

Redshirt
Oct 17, 2001
73,677
25
0
that the Mueller Report (minus proper redactions) needs to be released to the public? I can’t accept the conclusion of an Attorney General who wrote a 19-page memorandum before gaining the AG position that dismissed Mueller’s work before he even saw the report. Neither can i accept the Dems’ spin that the Mueller Report probably says this or that. I want to see the Report for myself and form my own conclusions. I am not willing to forfeit my right to form my own conclusions to the Repubs or the Dems or any talking heads on tv. The more either side tries to hide things from us, the more i think there is to hide.

What legitimate and credible reason would either side have for keeping the actual findings of fact (minus proper redactions) from the American public?

You won't and will never see the full report and you should deal with that fact now and move on. what will be released will be heavily redacted and will be almost worthless. What you need to accept is that Mueller and Roesenstein (remember how the left fell in love with them) were on the case and said there was no wrong doing on Trump's part.

#acceptreality
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,860
282
83
Dream on. Most of your peeps are upset that the president was not conspiring with Russia. The rest still don't believe it's true.
Dems should start setting up meetings with foreign gov'ts that might have dirt on Trump.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You won't and will never see the full report and you should deal with that fact now and move on. what will be released will be heavily redacted and will be almost worthless. What you need to accept is that Mueller and Roesenstein (remember how the left fell in love with them) were on the case and said there was no wrong doing on Trump's part.

#acceptreality

That's not what is being said...not even by Barr.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Let's see what the report has to say about obstruction which Trump was not exonerated of. Barr's got the so called prez's back though.

The entire campaign was exonerated of conspiracy with Russia. Piss off.
 

EERs 3:16

Redshirt
Oct 17, 2001
73,677
25
0
Let's see what the report has to say about obstruction which Trump was not exonerated of. Barr's got the so called prez's back though.

Your butt buddy Rod Rosenstein also had a hand in crafting that report. And if Mueller thought there was something there, then he would have certainly brought charge against Trump. Oh and let's not forget that Comey has proven himself to be less than a reliable source....sooo