Can you explain this?

[atlkvb]

@Boomboom521 I just want you to explain to me why you scoffed at my suggestion recently that the Left would accuse Barr of
"covering" up for Trump or "hiding" the true findings of the Mueller report?

Here is part of the thread

(Mar27,2019)

Then we don’t know there wasn’t collusion or obstruction then

We know there's no evidence of it and no proof of it. Evidence is King here. This is not a relative question. It either happened and there is evidence for it or it didn't and there isn't.

And I guessing the SC appointed by the United States Department of Justice with millions of dollars in resources and the full operating power of the law has more ability to gain and review evidence than you do on your cell phone when hard at work.

Summary says SC found that Russia hacked the DNC and disseminated through Wikileaks. And your response is........?

Where's the evidence?

Summary says there was no collusion and no obstruction of justice. And the Left's response has been.....?

In the fvcking report I’m guessing, dipshit!

The only one showing their immaturity and childish like petulance is YOU! Neither you nor the Left accepts Barr's conclusion from reading Mueller's report that there was no obstruction. They're all out there still insisting that not only was their obstruction but there was probably also collusion and Barr is hiding it!

Link to whole thread where this was brought up
https://westvirginia.forums.rivals....the-biggest-democrat-farce-in-history.200448/

edit: I guess all I'm really asking for is either an explanation from you of your scoffing at my suggestion (which turns out was 100% correct) or you admitting that I was right all along and this proves it. I know I won't get either from you, but one can hope correct? Relatively speaking?