Classic Drudge headline: Pittsburgh not Paris
- Thread starter WVPATX
- Start date
Brilliant. You think it is stupid because you think as Hillary does that the rust belt is unimportant. This headline speaks to those people.
You don't even know how much global warming would be reduced with the Paris climate accord. Let me give you a clue, less than 1°C in fact only half of that amount by the year 2100.
Last edited:
He doesn't even know why he is angry. He has to read liberal websites before he gets back to you.
Only morons think the dickhead's comments today were relevant. Even Pittsburgh's mayor mocked the President of the country that is now on the side of Syria and Nicaraugua. You morons are proud, I am sure.
Here is hint: The agreement has nothing to do with Paris except that is where it happened. Morons.
Here is hint: The agreement has nothing to do with Paris except that is where it happened. Morons.
The mayor of Pittsburgh is a Dem with one vote. Talk to the factory workers, the oil and gas workers, the manufacturing workers, the utility workers, etc. Not surprised you don't see this.
You continue to be too stupid to even start a computer much less talk about issues. STFU
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
His research was peer reviewed and this guy believes in global warming (he is very well knows in the climate science circles) but believes the Paris deal was a disaster. He feels we can do much better and be more effective using less money and accomplish much more to actually lower temperatures by doing a great deal more research in green energy to make it cost beneficial compared to fossil fuels. For the record, I don't find myself in agreement with him very much, if that gives you some comfort. You can try and find other studies on the accord and its true impact. But keep in mind, China and India have almost unlimited reign and the Paris Accords have zero enforcement.
I think our economic Freedom and way of Life is more important than some Leftist income redistribution scheme or Socialist governing philosophy desguised as environmental policy.
There isn't one plan anyone on the Left can point to that says we get rid of man made global warming in year X...and here's how we do it.
Not one.
So someone's science is correct IF it matches with what you think? I like some of his ideas (not his, but asserted by him as a solution) like wave energy. But his background is political science, and his work has been rejected and even accused of using false information.
Someone better dam the levees on the Mississippi river after all this melting snowflake.
This research was peer reviewed. Nice try. Check out my latest post. The U.S. is a world leader in reduced emissions without Paris. We are doing it using market forces, technology, fracking, clean coal technology, innovation.
And remember the ignorant left railed on fracking for years saying it harmed drinking water with no facts. After researching it they determined it was just a big lie. Science my ***.
The same results could easily be gleaned from all of their alarmist predictions. The only consistency in any of them have been their 100% record of inaccuracy.
The Left gets to dictate the parameters of the debate, define the terms, set up the measurements, predict the results, then fully escape explaining how wrong everything was and blame its opponents for not believing them in the first place!
Nice.
You should read the Duke study. What strawman brought up surface mining? What does that have to do with fracking?