and the Dems bragged about the VA being proof that single payer works.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/02/politics/va-inspector-general-report/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/02/politics/va-inspector-general-report/index.html
That's not even an example of single payer anyway ... that would be Medicare, which for all the attempted (and discovered) fraud, works pretty well according to the people who use it.
Exactly. Nothing the federal govt does is efficient.What? The Va is the epitome of a government run medical system.
You said "single payer" not "government run." The VA is government run, Medicare is single payer.What? The Va is the epitome of a government run medical system.
You said "single payer" not "government run." The VA is government run, Medicare is single payer.
As a veteran I'm not justifying anything that the VA has done, in fact I'm outraged by the indifference and incompetence that's being uncovered on an almost daily basis. But you and anyone else who characterizes the VA as single payer need to learn the difference between single payer and government run.Lol. The lengths libs go to to justify failed government programs. The VA is single payer, and the Dems once bragged about that fact.
As a veteran I'm not justifying anything that the VA has done, in fact I'm outraged by the indifference and incompetence that's being uncovered on an almost daily basis. But you and anyone else who characterizes the VA as single payer need to learn the difference between single payer and government run.
As a Vietnam Vet--this didn't just start. The government SUCKS at what is does outside of the military.
Well, we have too many bases in far too many states. The military could be much more efficient too.I agree. Our military is the sole shiny bright spot in a sea of ****.
Seriously, justify? I'm not justifying anything, nor am I trying to hold the VA up as some shining example of government efficiency. I swear, attempting to have a rational discussion with you and some like you on this board is like trying to teach a pig to sing ... wastes time and annoys the pig.Lmao. Your defense of this is laughable. It's both single payer and government run and you want this for the American people? Governments are inherently inefficient, in our case extremely inefficient and incompetent and you want government to manage healthcare? OMG.
Libs favorite economist wrote:
Ny Times’ columnist Paul Krugman called the Veterans Affairs Department’s “success story one of the best-kept secrets in the American policy debate.” Krugman wrote in 2006, “The secret of its success is the fact that it's a universal, integrated system.”
Seriously, justify? I'm not justifying anything, nor am I trying to hold the VA up as some shining example of government efficiency. I swear, attempting to have a rational discussion with you and some like you on this board is like trying to teach a pig to sing ... wastes time and annoys the pig.
Once again, "single payer" means the government pays providers, not that it provides the service. See Medicare; also, France, Sweden, Germany, and other social democracies. The VA is a government run system. Anyone who doesn't get the difference shouldn't be trying to talk or write about it.
Our combat capability is the bright shiny star. The machine that runs the military is a charlie foxtrot and if want for contractors they couldn't get out of their own way.I agree. Our military is the sole shiny bright spot in a sea of ****.
I understand perfectly -- I'm not the one confusing single payer with government run, nor did I say that Medicare was perfect. You need to do some research about how single payer systems work in those countries I mentioned. Your argument about single payer forcing rationing is the same argument used in attempts to defeat Medicare when it passed. It wasn't accurate then and it's not accurate now. We already have rationed care, except it's controlled by corporations. Are you arguing that that's a better system?Medicare and Medicaid arr rife with fraud and abuse. Many many doctors today are refusing to even see Medicare patients. Single-payer would force rationing of healthcare and place the care of individuals in the hands of government officials. One Must be clinically insane to support such a prospect. I am not sure what part of this you cannot possibly understand. Once again, Dems were hailing the vA system as a model for what they wanted.
I understand perfectly -- I'm not the one confusing single payer with government run, nor did I say that Medicare was perfect. You need to do some research about how single payer systems work in those countries I mentioned. Your argument about single payer forcing rationing is the same argument used in attempts to defeat Medicare when it passed. It wasn't accurate then and it's not accurate now. We already have rationed care, except it's controlled by corporations. Are you arguing that that's a better system?
Only 10 days? Are you sure the didn't say 10 decades?Medicare just became my primary coverage. I have had a couple of appointments with doctors, all of which were denied. I will admit I seemed to work great until the rejects came flowing in. I have filed a ton of paper work for Medicare B, Medicare D, and G. I called and I'll admit that the in reaction went well.
Now the jawdropper, it is going to take 10 DAYES to make Medicare my primary insurer.
LMAO. That would not fly in the private sector
The machine that runs the military is a charlie foxtrot and if want for contractors they couldn't get out of their own way.
Nor does it fly in countries that have single payer systems.Medicare just became my primary coverage. I have had a couple of appointments with doctors, all of which were denied. I will admit I seemed to work great until the rejects came flowing in. I have filed a ton of paper work for Medicare B, Medicare D, and G. I called and I'll admit that the in reaction went well.
Now the jawdropper, it is going to take 10 DAYES to make Medicare my primary insurer.
LMAO. That would not fly in the private sector
If you believe that your ignorance index just jumped another 100 points with me.Corporations are infinitely better at controlling waste fraud and abuse.
It is analogous to your most popular democratic hopeful running non profit on a server at an unknown location with multiple entities exchanging classified government with no security. BwaHaHaHa.
The government purchasing process is a mess. I would point to that as something the government does very inefficiently. That's one of the major IT hurdles with government, yesterday's technology tomorrow.If you believe that your ignorance index just jumped another 100 points with me.
If you believe that your ignorance index just jumped another 100 points with me.