^ And some have been undervaluing Lumpkin all season (not to mention all off-season) just b/c he doesn't take many shots.
Like I stated before, the best D under CC was Crawford, Cobb and Lumpkin on the court at the same time.
Demps isn't Cobb, but could have had a semblance of that w/ Law, Demps and Lumpkin.
W/ Law, CC could have gone w/ a defensive oriented F-rotatation w/ Law and Lumpkin, or mix it up w/ Law and Tap, Lumpkin and Falzon or a combo w/ Skelly.
Have been disappointed in Tap's D in the prior game - it's one thing for him to get beat athletically, but he shouldn't be out of position so many times as this is his 3rd yr in the program.
Didn't follow Tap too much on the defensive end, but I'm assuming he did better tonight - hence getting 20+ mins (most out of the bench).
Lindsey has the length and athleticism to be a shut-down defender at the 2, but haven't seen it yet, esp. against better competition (really haven't seen him light it up on the offensive side against better comp as well, tho did have a pretty good scoring game against UNC).
But Lindsey was always more of a work in progress than someone like BMac; it took 2-3 yrs before Hearn and Demps really blossomed, so still plenty of time.
If Lindsey makes the next step defensively, the 'Cats should be pretty good w/ the 3 L's on the floor next season.
But if Lindsey and Skelly (who I think is ahead of schedule in that dept.) improve over the course of this season defensively - the 'Cats could make things interesting down the stretch.