Congrats NECNHeel...

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
...on a great season and a great job representing the ACC throughout the tourney right up to that final shot. All you can do is put yourself in a position for a miracle shot to beat you.

Looking forward to our baseball series in a month. Congrats again!...
 

BooneCo_Card

All-Conference
Mar 20, 2005
8,205
1,274
0
...on a great season and a great job representing the ACC throughout the tourney right up to that final shot. All you can do is put yourself in a position for a miracle shot to beat you.

Looking forward to our baseball series in a month. Congrats again!...
One incredible BB game. Your guys represented well. Don't be a stranger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NENCHeel

NENCHeel

Sophomore
Mar 31, 2009
1,613
187
0
I'm in rationalization mode right now. Glad we got to compete against a great great team, glad it wasn't dook or the kitties that beat us, glad the end of the "Death Penalty' taunts is coming...glad the kids acted like true SAs afterwards.
 
Jan 5, 2012
83,279
6,457
0
I find it head scratching how so many on other boards, including the main board, want to treat last night's game like it was a huge trolling worthy embarrassment for UNC that they got beat on a last second shot. From where I sit, UNC MADE a last second shot that would have won the National Championship, if not for a bigger last second shot. They are the National Runnerup...2nd place for the entire 2015-16 NCAA basketball season. Does the way they lost hurt? I'm sure it does, but they DO have the satisfaction of being in The Final Game, and only ONE other team finished the season better. When programs are comparing accomplishments, UNC now has one more National Title Game to their credit. Kudos and congrats to them...and Villanova, of course.
 
Last edited:

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
Here's my perspective, there was some media attention towards UNC, especially during the Syracuse - UNC matchup between two teams that took different approaches to NCAA violations. There probably would have still been some discussions regarding Syracuse if they had beat the Tarheels such as Was the punishment enough? Didn't seem to affect them this year? The only thing I will say is that this UNC team was very talented and well deserving and there should not be an asterisk by this UNC team's name. But if the time comes, there definitely should be one next to the 2005 National Championship team.
 

Louisville JD

Freshman
Apr 3, 2013
608
50
0
Got no skin in the game because I live in Pittsburgh and got unc friends, but Bilas called the referring unfortunately bad. I agree and thought it was shaded toward Nova especially last part of game. Hey Carolina made shots down the stretch so hold your head high. cards will get the hardware back in 17 for the AACC
 
  • Like
Reactions: NENCHeel

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
...The only thing I will say is that this UNC team was very talented and well deserving and there should not be an asterisk by this UNC team's name. But if the time comes, there definitely should be one next to the 2005 National Championship team.
And you know that how?? :rolleyes:
 

kozmas

Senior
Oct 10, 2011
4,096
445
0
I agree with the refs not trying to take anything from Villanova because they have a great team. However, there sure we're some bad calls favoring Villanova.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NENCHeel

NENCHeel

Sophomore
Mar 31, 2009
1,613
187
0
I won't complain about the refs. I try to never do that. But if I see an escaped zebra running loose around my part of North Carolina, he's going down...fast and hard.

Sorry, still some post-game frustration. :)
 

rockycard

Heisman
Jan 8, 2007
129,782
10,816
0
Here's my perspective, there was some media attention towards UNC, especially during the Syracuse - UNC matchup between two teams that took different approaches to NCAA violations. There probably would have still been some discussions regarding Syracuse if they had beat the Tarheels such as Was the punishment enough? Didn't seem to affect them this year? The only thing I will say is that this UNC team was very talented and well deserving and there should not be an asterisk by this UNC team's name. But if the time comes, there definitely should be one next to the 2005 National Championship team.
When you post, it's hard for me not to imagine that you're not Charlie Brown's school teacher.... I keep reading wahwahwahwahwah!!!!
 

BooneCo_Card

All-Conference
Mar 20, 2005
8,205
1,274
0
Got no skin in the game because I live in Pittsburgh and got unc friends, but Bilas called the referring unfortunately bad. I agree and thought it was shaded toward Nova especially last part of game. Hey Carolina made shots down the stretch so hold your head high. cards will get the hardware back in 17 for the AACC
I agree that the refereeing was not up to the calibre of the two teams on the floor, but I felt Jenkins got hosed on the 1st PF and most definitely on his 4th.
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
And you know that how?? :rolleyes:
Zipp and rocky,

I lived in NC for the last 25 years and you think our scandal has dragged on? Please google UNC tutoring scandal. The tutor did not even have a college education although she said she was "taking" classes at Duke and UNC but yet has not been substantiated. I will let it go at that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eastwood45789

eastwood45789

Sophomore
Feb 25, 2016
460
189
0
North Carolina is not an honorable program and I'm glad Villanova won. You won't see them with any self imposed sanctions. The best thing this season was beating North Carolina and Duke, the two bastions of the arrogant.
 

earsky

All-Conference
Jan 12, 2010
11,904
4,199
0
North Carolina is not an honorable program and I'm glad Villanova won. You won't see them with any self imposed sanctions. The best thing this season was beating North Carolina and Duke, the two bastions of the arrogant.
Well then,there are probably very few "honorable" programs at all.If you think about how many programs have gotten away with the slightest of infractions and knowingly,it's still cheating.Just because you get away with it,don't make you honorable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zipp_rivals

Cue Card

All-American
Mar 7, 2011
11,659
7,155
0
Well then,there are probably very few "honorable" programs at all.If you think about how many programs have gotten away with the slightest of infractions and knowingly,it's still cheating.Just because you get away with it,don't make you honorable.
That's right. There was one program not long ago that had never ever had any type of major infraction. It was considered THE model program for all of collegiate sports. That program was
>
>
>
>
>
PENN STATE

Now what?
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
I think it was a Jerry Sandusky issue that could have happened at any major university.
 

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
Then, welcome to the club of the dishonorable.



"Elite program", my a$$...
 

Cue Card

All-American
Mar 7, 2011
11,659
7,155
0
I think it was a Jerry Sandusky issue that could have happened at any major university.
I agree. It could have happened at any university, and any university could have covered it up while pretending to be the poster child program of integrity.

Yes?
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
I agree. It could have happened at any university, and any university could have covered it up while pretending to be the poster child program of integrity.

Yes?
The university as a collective entity, no, but certain individuals involved with the university, yes. Which on certain fronts is related to our case. In UNC's case there was a concerted attempt to "assist" those who needed academic assistance. However, that got exploited further into making sure certain athletes were "eligible to participate in college athletics".

As to omega's claim, there was no benefit to Paterno. He didn't know how to properly deal with it and did not know the extent of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Louisville JD

OmegaCard

Junior
Mar 27, 2014
1,012
393
0
The university as a collective entity, no, but certain individuals involved with the university, yes. Which on certain fronts is related to our case. In UNC's case there was a concerted attempt to "assist" those who needed academic assistance. However, that got exploited further into making sure certain athletes were "eligible to participate in college athletics".

As to omega's claim, there was no benefit to Paterno. He didn't know how to properly deal with it and did not know the extent of it.

Of course I don't know for sure...and neither do you. But it is not crazy to assume Sandusky had dirt on JP and that's why he was allowed to stick around.
 

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
You forgot Andre.
That ain't the point... When you live in a glass house, you're an idiot throwing stones. I made this point a year ago to Carolina bashers in our fanbase and before this McGee/Powell issue.

We're in no better position throwing stones at UNC than LPT is throwing stones at us. And spare me a debate how bad these episodes are compared to each another.

"Elite program", my a$$...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: CardsFirst

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
That ain't the point... When you live in a glass house, you're an idiot throwing stones. I made this point a year ago to Carolina bashers in our fanbase and before this McGee/Powell issue.

We're in no better position throwing stones at UNC than LPT is throwing stones at us. And spare me a debate how bad these episodes are compared to each another, like nccardfan is trying to do.

"Elite program", my a$$...
Zippisms at its best!! The first paragraph Zipp links the Carolina situation with ours and the the 2nd paragraph he scolds me for pointing out similarities and differences. Thanks for the chuckle...
 

OmegaCard

Junior
Mar 27, 2014
1,012
393
0
That ain't the point... When you live in a glass house, you're an idiot throwing stones. I made this point a year ago to Carolina bashers in our fanbase and before this McGee/Powell issue.

We're in no better position throwing stones at UNC than LPT is throwing stones at us. And spare me a debate how bad these episodes are compared to each another.

"Elite program", my a$$...

Everyone cheats. Too much money and too much to lose without trying. The point is ...It seems that there's a small handful that get to live in brick houses. 100k jewelry loans (wouldn't a respectable merchant lawsuit be stronger evidence than any hoe's deposition?) and grade rigging? And then the outrage/ESPN investigations into a college party with strippers?
 
Last edited:

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
Everyone cheats. Too much money and too much to lose without trying. The point is ...It seems that there's a small handful that get to live in brick houses. 100k jewelry loans (wouldn't a respectable merchant lawsuit be stronger evidence than any hoe's deposition?) and grade rigging? And then the outrage/ESPN investigations into a college party with strippers?
If I understand your point, let's not blame the NCAA or the system for us sitting home while UNC nearly wins another championship. We gave ourselves a postseason ban, no one else did. Carolina is letting the process play out. And time will tell whether those were the right decisions by each school.

"Elite program", my a$$...
 

Cue Card

All-American
Mar 7, 2011
11,659
7,155
0
If I understand your point, let's not blame the NCAA or the system for us sitting home while UNC nearly wins another championship. We gave ourselves a postseason ban, no one else did. Carolina is letting the process play out. And time will tell whether those were the right decisions by each school.

"Elite program", my a$$...
I am actually pleased that we have an AD who wanted to get out in front of this instead of waiting, and waiting, and waiting for an outcome that could end up being devastating to the program. He's being proactive to a fault according to some. UNC took a different path and it might pay off for them. It probably will. Being a brand new member to the big boy table, I don't think we had much choice but to be proactive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nccardfan

OmegaCard

Junior
Mar 27, 2014
1,012
393
0
If I understand your point, let's not blame the NCAA or the system for us sitting home while UNC nearly wins another championship. We gave ourselves a postseason ban, no one else did. Carolina is letting the process play out. And time will tell whether those were the right decisions by each school.

"Elite program", my a$$...

nm
 
Last edited:

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
I am actually pleased that we have an AD who wanted to get out in front of this instead of waiting, and waiting, and waiting for an outcome that could end up being devastating to the program. He's being proactive to a fault according to some. UNC took a different path and it might pay off for them. It probably will. Being a brand new member to the big boy table, I don't think we had much choice but to be proactive.
Cue, the only issue with your POV is I'm not at all sure that Jurich was behind the ban. I'm 100% a Jurich supporter, and if I truly thought that this was his invention, I'd agree with you. But if you believe what people were saying on February 5th--and not Pitino a day later--this was Doc's decision. Supposedly, Jurich was part of the investigation and like Pitino not privy to what Ramsey and Smrt were. Only when the lynch mob was forming did this become Jurich's decision. And if you try to read people at that presser, Jurich who's the one guy we want to hear from the most, said the least.

I believe this was in fact Ramsey's and Smrt's decision, and both players in that capacity bother me quite a bit. I'm not one of the Doc haters out there. But his track record in making athletic department decisions of this magnitude is limited. Jurich is the man. And I reflect back on how he handled the Clint Hurtt show-cause ruling by the NCAA to guide me on how he handles tough decisions. In the near future, we'll know one way or the other whether Ramsey just dragged us all onto that sword.

"Elite program", my a$$...
 
  • Like
Reactions: OneEarWonder

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
Cue, the only issue with your POV is I'm not at all sure that Jurich was behind the ban. I'm 100% a Jurich supporter, and if I truly thought that this was his invention, I'd agree with you. But if you believe what people were saying on February 5th--and not Pitino a day later--this was Doc's decision. Supposedly, Jurich was part of the investigation and like Pitino not privy to what Ramsey and Smrt were. Only when the lynch mob was forming did this become Jurich's decision. And if you try to read people at that presser, Jurich who's the one guy we want to hear from the most, said the least.

I believe this was in fact Ramsey's and Smrt's decision, and both players in that capacity bother me quite a bit. I'm not one of the Doc haters out there. But his track record in making athletic department decisions of this magnitude is limited. Jurich is the man. And I reflect back on how he handled the Clint Hurtt show-cause ruling by the NCAA to guide me on how he handles tough decisions. In the near future, we'll know one way or the other whether Ramsey just dragged us all onto that sword.

"Elite program", my a$$...
I'm sorry but you are just nieve to think that Ramsay acted alone and then again on these sanctions. He's in so much hot water and scrutiny he would be dumb to take more action. Also Smrt is a paid consultant, he's not a U of L employee, he's not making the decision when the only person who should be is the AD. I think Tom is just fulfilling his obligations by not being able to say anything because he does not want to jeopardize the University.
 

zipp_rivals

Heisman
Jun 26, 2001
92,957
11,953
0
I'm sorry but you are just nieve to think that Ramsay acted alone and then again on these sanctions. He's in so much hot water and scrutiny he would be dumb to take more action. Also Smrt is a paid consultant, he's not a U of L employee, he's not making the decision when the only person who should be is the AD. I think Tom is just fulfilling his obligations by not being able to say anything because he does not want to jeopardize the University.
Then, why did Ramsey say "I" and "my" a half dozen times during the presser and in his letter to boosters and alumni? Flies in the face of what you're saying.

Like I said, the story only changed when banners started hanging off of buildings and people were ready to run him out of town. And BTW, I've never heard Ramsey himself change that story.

"Elite program", my a$$...
 

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
It's like the president of the US, anything and everything that happens at U of L, whether we agree or not falls under the responsibility of the President. If he starts saying that's the AD's responsibility or CRP's that only demonstrates to the NCAA, there is a lack of institutional control at U of L and while we may WANT Ramsey to say as you put it, fall on the sword, this is clearly an athletics issue not an academic one. Putting the blame on someone else does nothing for the NCAA.