That won’t go over well with Buckaineer
If the Bearcats &/or any (remaining) B12 teams always have more teams in the top 10 than the P12 have, more team(s) in the top 5 with the P12 having none & always have a team (including the Bearcats) in the pigskin final 4 with the P12 always none, all happening until both media rights are signed, then the B12 HAS to fetch > $/team than the P12 will.Not likely.
You’re so predictable lolIt won’t go over well with Buckaineer because the numbers are “fudged”. TV executives haven’t said the only ratings that matter are those over 1 million viewers. People skewing the numbers have said that. When you add ALL the real tv numbers together BIG 12 schools TV ratings are AHEAD of most PAC schools.
If its what you want to hear than its truth if its not its fudged. Once Texas and Oklahoma leave the big 12's rating will be like the stock market in 1929It won’t go over well with Buckaineer because the numbers are “fudged”. TV executives haven’t said the only ratings that matter are those over 1 million viewers. People skewing the numbers have said that. When you add ALL the real tv numbers together BIG 12 schools TV ratings are AHEAD of most PAC schools.
That won’t go over well with Buckaineer
Buckaineer won't like this eitherIt won’t go over well with Buckaineer because the numbers are “fudged”. TV executives haven’t said the only ratings that matter are those over 1 million viewers. People skewing the numbers have said that. When you add ALL the real tv numbers together BIG 12 schools TV ratings are AHEAD of most PAC schools.
Real numbers don't lie like you do.If its what you want to hear than its truth if its not its fudged. Once Texas and Oklahoma leave the big 12's rating will be like the stock market in 1929
Do you even know what the article is about? Texas and Oklahoma help drive up ratings more for the Big 12 than USC and Ucla do for the Pac 12. Whether you like it or not big 12 ratings will take a hit once these two schools are gone.Real numbers don't lie like you do.
I post FACTS. You post shill ********.
No matter. TV executives don't look at shill ********, they evaluate REAL NUMBERS and FACTS in negotiations.
Do you know what the article is about? He is trying to pretend PAC 12 schools rated higher than BIG 12 schools because Texas and OU were far bigger tv draws than USC and UCLA.Do you even know what the article is about? Texas and Oklahoma help drive up ratings more for the Big 12 than USC and Ucla do for the Pac 12. Whether you like it or not big 12 ratings will take a hit once these two schools are gone.
Only Oklahoma State and OregonAnd as some mention above--look at last year and the final ratings of schools that will be in the BIG 12 and MAY be in the PAC:
#4 Cincinnati--in four team playoff, lost to champ Alabama
#5 Baylor --beat OU, beat UT, beat Ole Miss in Sugar
#7 OK State--beat Notre Dame in Fiesta
#12 Utah--lost to tOSU in Rose
#17 Houston--beat Auburn in bowl
#19 BYU--beat all 5 PAC schools played including top 2 Utah and USC
#22 Oregon--Lost to OU in Alamo
No playoff for the PAC for the ?th year running?
Now again, honestly, which of these looks to be the more valuable?
Texas and Oklahoma mean more to the big 12 then usc and ucla mean to the Pac 12. When you take out Texas and Oklahoma when was the last time a Big 12 team played for a national championship?Do you know what the article is about? He is trying to pretend PAC 12 schools rated higher than BIG 12 schools because Texas and OU were far bigger tv draws than USC and UCLA.
To make his already flawed case he SKEWS the numbers by eliminating the lower rated games (under 1 mil viewers), Doesn't mention that every BIG 12 team played both Texas and OU each year while almost none of the PAC schools played USC or UCLA each year. Also leaves out that some of the PAC schools games aren't rated each year because they are on the PAC network and rated so low they don't count, while only one game from BIG 12 schools was NOT rated on a national platform.
But again, tv executives and negotiators will see all of this such as that when Baylor and OK State played in last years CCG, they rated 4 million viewers MORE than the PAC 12 CCG which didn't include either USC or UCLA. And in a NOON game to boot. They'll also evaluate ALL tv numbers along with many other things. And we already know that experts in the field predict the BIG 12 will be at a much higher $$ figure than the PAC will when its said and done--something you conveniently leave out for your shill bosses to try to put down the BIG 12.
Stop lying about the BIG 12 in an effort to make your dying conference look better.
Buck how come you have nothing to say about this statement from the admin at Colorado?Do you know what the article is about? He is trying to pretend PAC 12 schools rated higher than BIG 12 schools because Texas and OU were far bigger tv draws than USC and UCLA.
To make his already flawed case he SKEWS the numbers by eliminating the lower rated games (under 1 mil viewers), Doesn't mention that every BIG 12 team played both Texas and OU each year while almost none of the PAC schools played USC or UCLA each year. Also leaves out that some of the PAC schools games aren't rated each year because they are on the PAC network and rated so low they don't count, while only one game from BIG 12 schools was NOT rated on a national platform.
But again, tv executives and negotiators will see all of this such as that when Baylor and OK State played in last years CCG, they rated 4 million viewers MORE than the PAC 12 CCG which didn't include either USC or UCLA. And in a NOON game to boot. They'll also evaluate ALL tv numbers along with many other things. And we already know that experts in the field predict the BIG 12 will be at a much higher $$ figure than the PAC will when its said and done--something you conveniently leave out for your shill bosses to try to put down the BIG 12.
Stop lying about the BIG 12 in an effort to make your dying conference look better.
That comment DID NOT come from the administration at Colorado, it came from a wanna be sports journalist being interviewed on the 365 radio podcast giving HIS OPINION of what CU administrators think.Buck how come you have nothing to say about this statement from the admin at Colorado?
The administration at CU views the Big 12 as a JUCO league. They don’t want to be in that
The writer who made that comment works for the Denver post fool. Anytime something gets printed that you don't like its all of a sudden from a wanna be sportswriter. The majority of the junk you quote comes from wanna be sportswriters that are just stating opinion not fact. Maybe you should learn the difference fool.That comment DID NOT come from the administration at Colorado, it came from a wanna be sports journalist being interviewed on the 365 radio podcast giving HIS OPINION of what CU administrators think.
Made up bunk being used as propaganda. Why didn’t you post THE SOURCE of the comment? Facts matter.
The Denver post never advocated for anything as you claim. It was only opinion writers working for them. You were called out in another thread for making these bs type statements and were asked to name credible sources outside of the dude and beat writers working for Baylor/Colorado. You failed to do so. Its only credible in your mind if it advances your agenda.The comment credited to the University of Colorado CAME FROM A "JOURNALIST's" OPINION of what CU administrators think.
Shilldiots trying to pretend its an actual statement from an actual administrator at CU are LYING.
No one from CU has made such a comment and its pretty laughable to pretend such propaganda means anything or has any effect.
What does make a difference is MONEY. And the PAC is not likely to be paid nearly as much as the BIG 12 will (nor are they likely to keep all members.)
True. Colorado would prefer the Big 10 over any conference.The Denver post never advocated for anything as you claim. It was only opinion writers working for them. You were called out in another thread for making these bs type statements and were asked to name credible sources outside of the dude and beat writers working for Baylor/Colorado. You failed to do so. Its only credible in your mind if it advances your agenda.
I'd prefer a spaceship over my car. Both have an equal chance of happening.True. Colorado would prefer the Big 10 over any conference.
I'd prefer a spaceship over my car. Both have an equal chance of happening.
Colorado staying in the Pac-12 would invite an interesting question: Does this mean Utah is staying, too? Are Colorado and Utah going to move together or stay together? Or, could Utah go to the Big Ten while Colorado stays put? The likely answer: CU and Utah would be tethered. That is not, however, a guarantee.
If Colorado leaves the Pac-12, that means it will return to the Big 12, which it left over a decade ago to join the Pac-12. Awkward!
Say, who was the athletic director at Colorado when it left the Big 12 for the Pac-12? You might have heard the name before: Mike Bohn.
I guess some people believe message board fodder over actual news. Nobody knows 100% what is actually going to happen. These media so called experts like to use click bait words.Guess some people cant read— straight from sports columnists at the Denver Post
obviously approved for printing by the people running the Denver Post.