Toggle sidebar

Covid thread deleted?

J

JumperJack

New member
Oct 30, 2002
21,998
65,621
0
How we feeling? This was on X today.

HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC

1. China released staged footage of people "dropping dead" in the streets: scenes never seen anywhere else in the world prior and after December 2019.
2. A PCR test was introduced that didn’t determine if someone was actually sick. Almost all results were false positives.
3. They pushed the lie of asymptomatic transmission to justify restrictions on healthy people and mass testing the whole world.
4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and label truth as "misinformation."
5. Behavioral psychologists were used to craft fear-based messaging and manipulate public compliance.
6. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data.
7. Since mild cold symptoms wouldn’t deliver that, they terrorized the global population to trigger a mass psychogenic illness.
8. Constant fearmongering led to chronically elevated cortisol levels, weakening immune systems, especially among the elderly.
9. Social isolation, medical neglect, and lockdowns caused the excess deaths they needed to support the narrative.
10. They suddenly claimed masks worked, something no serious authority had ever recommended before for respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking billboard for fear.
11. People were gaslit into staying home "until the vaccine was ready," giving authorities more time to expand control.
12. They injected billions with an experimental product, claiming it would prevent infection and transmission.
13. When that failed, they moved the goalposts: "If the unvaccinated don’t get the shot, your shot won’t work."
14. They invented new "variants" every few months to justify never-ending booster campaigns.
15. They fabricated a new condition, "long COVID," to cover up the mounting side effects of the injections.
16. Pharmaceutical giants made record profits, protected by government contracts and zero liability.
17. Those who spoke out were silenced, banned, investigated, or publicly discredited.
18. And once the narrative became too absurd to sustain, they abruptly declared the pandemic over, and pretended none of it had ever happened.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471, Kaizer Sosay, Bill Derington and 2 others
B

bigblueinsanity_rivals250340

New member
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
97,193
0
catlanta33 said:
My favorite parts other than the Fauci is a criminal and should be hung stuff:

EcoHealth — under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak — used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. After the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth violating the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commenced official debarment proceedings and suspended all funding to EcoHealth.
EcoHealth President Dr. Peter Daszak obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation by providing publicly available information, instructing his staff to reduce the scope and pace of productions, and doctoring documents before releasing them to the public. Further, Dr. Daszak provided false statements to Congress.

New evidence also shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened an investigation into EcoHealth’s pandemic-era activities.
NIH’s procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security. Further, NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record keeping laws — as seen through the actions of Dr. David Morens and “FOIA Lady” Marge Moore.

There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19. Public health officials flipped-flopped on the efficacy of masks without providing Americans scientific data — causing a massive uptick in public distrust.
Prolonged lockdowns caused immeasurable harm to not only the American economy, but also to the mental and physical health of Americans, with a particularly negative effect on younger citizens.
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s March 25 Order — which forced nursing homes to accept COVID-19 positive patients — “was medical malpractice.” Evidence shows that Mr. Cuomo and his Administration worked to cover up the tragic aftermath of their policy decisions in an apparent effort to shield themselves from accountability.
Click to expand...


Iirc daszak was who fauci tasked with "taking care" of any professionals speaking out against their fascist bs. Hopefully he didn't get pardoned
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471 and Bonzo_Cat
C

catlanta33

New member
Aug 27, 2013
78,937
12,347
0
bigblueinsanity said:
Iirc daszak was who fauci tasked with "taking care" of any professionals speaking out against their fascist bs. Hopefully he didn't get pardoned
Click to expand...

He was behind the Lancet article, is or Eco is currently under investigation and did not get a pardon.

He's definitely 1b to Fauci on my hang 'em high list. He did all the dirty work while Fauci just sat there and gaslighted the entire world on all things covid.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: bigblueinsanity_rivals250340 and Nightwish84
N

Nightwish84

New member
Dec 11, 2020
4,973
6,270
0
So when is catlanta breaking into Fauci's home to string him up? I think the guy has mentioned Fauci needing to be hung until he's dead well over a hundred times at this point. I recall a poster telling him his mother had died from covid and catlanta's immediate response was to call him a lunatic so we know he lacks the ability to sympathize with others on a human level. That, and an obsessive fixation with needing someone of his choosing dead from hanging points to some warning signs with the poster's mental faculties.

Or maybe constant calls for a specific person needing to be hung and attacking others who confide that their parent has died is just normal behavior?
 
B

bigblueinsanity_rivals250340

New member
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
97,193
0
anthonys735 said:
For the first time I'm now more in the leaked intentionally than accident opinion. It's the most logical explanation. Occams Razor.
Click to expand...

Im still in the camp it was accidental and powers seized the opportunity to create the pandemic response that swung everything.

Usaid and the cia are certainly not above it, that's for sure. The combination of Mike benz work, the jgk files, and other recent declassified docs show that much.

However Iirc the usaid ngo used to battle covid "disinformation" wasn't created until months after the release. Given their history, if it was planned i think they would've had this up and running before.

So that's why im still in the camp of them pouncing rather than creating the opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Mehico
B

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,342
39,134
113
IMO it was a planned lab leak, if you recall the US Govt did conducted a pandemic response exercise in July or August of 2019.

How the Govt would react was known, China restricted flights from Wuhan to the rest of China, but allowed International flights, any attempt by the Admin to calm public fear was met with furor from the media and Democrats. Any mention that China was responsible was claimed as racism.
China was involved, but they weren't the only ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471, JumperJack, Kaizer Sosay and 1 other person
B

bigblueinsanity_rivals250340

New member
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
97,193
0
Bill Derington said:
IMO it was a planned lab leak, if you recall the US Govt did conducted a pandemic response exercise in July or August of 2019.

How the Govt would react was known, China restricted flights from Wuhan to the rest of China, but allowed International flights, any attempt by the Admin to calm public fear was met with furor from the media and Democrats. Any mention that China was responsible was claimed as racism.
China was involved, but they weren't the only ones.
Click to expand...

Oh it is certainly plausible they did it. They havent uncovered all the usaid ngos yet. There is a very good chance eventually one will be uncovered that was less public facing that drove the initial wave of government panic.

After all, usaid is a major funding source for the WHO, who drove the panic citing the ridiculous initial king's college study based on like 6 people on the same flight. I say ridiculous because the methodology was horrendous and the person running the study was a known scammer.

There is zero doubt the cia circled the wagons and saw a way to make major hay via funding while also making it waaaaay easier to get as many of their candidates installed as possible.

However If they created the opportunity, imo that ngo would've been laying the groundwork already AND the cia would've had a way more capable presidential candidate ready to go. No way they plan this unprecedented global initiative just to put up a dementia patient as their candidate. Had they planned it, they would've had someone way more charismatic and capable of at least existing for the reelection.

Maybe the counter the to the Biden argument is this let them install countless candidates, especially judges and prosecutors, nationwide. I just think had it been planned, they could've done that anyway and installed someone way more capable and still been rolling.
 
B

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,342
39,134
113
bigblueinsanity said:
Oh it is certainly plausible they did it. They havent uncovered all the usaid ngos yet. There is a very good chance eventually one will be uncovered that was less public facing that drove the initial wave of government panic.

After all, usaid is a major funding source for the WHO, who drove the panic citing the ridiculous initial king's college study based on like 6 people on the same flight. I say ridiculous because the methodology was horrendous and the person running the study was a known scammer.

There is zero doubt the cia circled the wagons and saw a way to make major hay via funding while also making it waaaaay easier to get as many of their candidates installed as possible.

However If they created the opportunity, imo that ngo would've been laying the groundwork already AND the cia would've had a way more capable presidential candidate ready to go. No way they plan this unprecedented global initiative just to put up a dementia patient as their candidate. Had they planned it, they would've had someone way more charismatic and capable of at least existing for the reelection.

Maybe the counter the to the Biden argument is this let them install countless candidates, especially judges and prosecutors, nationwide. I just think had it been planned, they could've done that anyway and installed someone way more capable and still been rolling.
Click to expand...
Biden was the only candidate that had been in DC forever, and had friends in both aisles of congress, as well as he was corrupt as hell, so he could be controlled.
2020 doesn't happen without both party establishment leaders being involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471 and JumperJack
S

Surewhatever

New member
Jun 30, 2019
90
228
0
Official figures from China showed its 2019 economic growth rate falling amid the trade war to a 30-year. A lot of that slow growth caused by US Tariffs.

Why would the CCP release a virus that would impact the world? ^ Has the CCP cared about the deaths of it's own people?
 
J

JumperJack

New member
Oct 30, 2002
21,998
65,621
0
Surewhatever said:
Official figures from China showed its 2019 economic growth rate falling amid the trade war to a 30-year. A lot of that slow growth caused by US Tariffs.

Why would the CCP release a virus that would impact the world? ^ Has the CCP cared about the deaths of it's own people?
Click to expand...
Why would China want to influence an election to remove the guy that was using tariffs against them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471, Crushgroove and Surewhatever
B

bigblueinsanity_rivals250340

New member
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
97,193
0
catlanta33 said:
Don't be that guy. It was probably worse here although I don't know if Greece paid their hospitals handsomely for covid positives like we did.
Click to expand...

Doubtful they did because im pretty sure they don't have for profit medicine. If their rate was 45% higher, no telling what ours was. 80? 90%? Neither are out of the question given the additional financial and political incentive to report someone dead as covid.

The covid financial windfall was so incredible in the US there are STILL covid grants floating around getting renewed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaizer Sosay and catlanta33
K

Kaizer Sosay

New member
Nov 29, 2007
25,706
30,726
0
vhcat70 said:
In Greece. How does that translate to anywhere else & their reporting system?
Click to expand...
There has been a ton of dumb posts in this thread…especially in the OG Covid thread that was deleted. Some of that can be excused because info & data were suppressed. But knowing what we know now…that is without a doubt the King Daddy Mack of dumb posts.

Congrats!
 
C

catlanta33

New member
Aug 27, 2013
78,937
12,347
0

Biden officials knew about potential COVID-19 vaccine risks — and took steps to downplay them, scathing Senate report​

At the time, Israel had a much higher vaccination rate than the US, the report noted.

About 10 days later, an FDA official drafted a response noting that “limitations of passive surveillance … [and] incomplete data make it challenging to assess causation.”

US health officials requested more data from the Israelis.

By mid-April, a Defense Department contractor involved with the Pentagon’s work on immunization delivered a presentation to the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) working group that concluded “there is a high likelihood that cardiac symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination represent a hypersensitivity eosinophilic myocarditis.”

By this time, there had been more than 158 cases cases of myocarditis, pericarditis or myopericarditis reported on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The following month, the COVID-19 vaccine was approved for adolescents and members of VaST “felt that information about reports of myocarditis should be communicated to providers.”

Top health officials also began deliberating releasing a draft National Health Alert Network (HAN) warning about myocarditis and pericarditis side effects from the vaccine.

“The pros and cons of an official HAN are what the main discussions are right now,” CDC official Dr. Sara Oliver wrote to Moderna on May 25, 2021. “I think it’s likely to be a HAN since that is CDC’s primary method of communications to clinicians and public health departments, but people don’t want to appear alarmist either.”

About a day later, then-FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock wrote in an email to then-CDC director Rochelle Walensky that the FDA was opposed to blasting out the warning as drafted.

Other top health officials raised objections as well. Then-director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research Peter Marks expressed concerns that “myocarditis and pericarditis have not actually signaled.”

Another official raised concerns that the HAN was necessary because “messages have not been trickling from the vaccine programs to providers at large.”

Instead of issuing the HAN warning, the CDC put out a notice on its website May 28, 2021, that there had been “increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis” reported in the US following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination from Pfizer and Moderna but continued to recommend immunization for those ages 12 and up.

Internal Biden administration talking points from this time period described myocarditis from COVID-19 vaccine as “rare” and had been circulated to top health brass.

“It is unclear, though, whether these talking points, which minimized the risk and harm of myocarditis, had any effect on the decision to not issue the HAN,” Johnson’s report noted.

By this point, the number of VAERS reports had spiked to 752 cases.

Then on June 25, 2021, the FDA updated the labels on the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to note the risk of myocarditis and similar complications.

https://nypost.com/2025/05/21/us-ne...n=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471, Spanish Radio, vhcat70 and 1 other person
B

bigblueinsanity_rivals250340

New member
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
97,193
0
catlanta33 said:

Biden officials knew about potential COVID-19 vaccine risks — and took steps to downplay them, scathing Senate report​

At the time, Israel had a much higher vaccination rate than the US, the report noted.

About 10 days later, an FDA official drafted a response noting that “limitations of passive surveillance … [and] incomplete data make it challenging to assess causation.”

US health officials requested more data from the Israelis.

By mid-April, a Defense Department contractor involved with the Pentagon’s work on immunization delivered a presentation to the COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical (VaST) working group that concluded “there is a high likelihood that cardiac symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination represent a hypersensitivity eosinophilic myocarditis.”

By this time, there had been more than 158 cases cases of myocarditis, pericarditis or myopericarditis reported on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The following month, the COVID-19 vaccine was approved for adolescents and members of VaST “felt that information about reports of myocarditis should be communicated to providers.”

Top health officials also began deliberating releasing a draft National Health Alert Network (HAN) warning about myocarditis and pericarditis side effects from the vaccine.

“The pros and cons of an official HAN are what the main discussions are right now,” CDC official Dr. Sara Oliver wrote to Moderna on May 25, 2021. “I think it’s likely to be a HAN since that is CDC’s primary method of communications to clinicians and public health departments, but people don’t want to appear alarmist either.”

About a day later, then-FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock wrote in an email to then-CDC director Rochelle Walensky that the FDA was opposed to blasting out the warning as drafted.

Other top health officials raised objections as well. Then-director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research Peter Marks expressed concerns that “myocarditis and pericarditis have not actually signaled.”

Another official raised concerns that the HAN was necessary because “messages have not been trickling from the vaccine programs to providers at large.”

Instead of issuing the HAN warning, the CDC put out a notice on its website May 28, 2021, that there had been “increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis” reported in the US following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination from Pfizer and Moderna but continued to recommend immunization for those ages 12 and up.

Internal Biden administration talking points from this time period described myocarditis from COVID-19 vaccine as “rare” and had been circulated to top health brass.

“It is unclear, though, whether these talking points, which minimized the risk and harm of myocarditis, had any effect on the decision to not issue the HAN,” Johnson’s report noted.

By this point, the number of VAERS reports had spiked to 752 cases.

Then on June 25, 2021, the FDA updated the labels on the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to note the risk of myocarditis and similar complications.

https://nypost.com/2025/05/21/us-ne...n=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Click to expand...

They had to know early. Anyone that knew people who got the shot pretty quickly knew something was wrong. Way too many had issues. Thats just anecdotal, so i cant imagine what the raw data shows.

vhcat70 said:
I see about 1.7M more USA deaths in years 2021-2023 than a smooth curve of this data outside those years predicts. Describe their cause however you like. Me, I see strong correlation with covid.

Click to expand...

If you're saying covid is still causing excess deaths, i couldn't agree more. Covid now is barely even a cold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun_rivals397471
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom