How is the Rose situation the same as fake classes going on for decades.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
Serious question here, what all has been proven that the basketball program actually did? I know it's been shown players took the classes and that counselors placed some in those classes, but what else? It's hard to follow with so much he said she said, but I know some here know everything and know what's hearsay and what is actual facts. For example, I hear a lot about how McCants was kept eligible with the four As, but those were in the spring semester of his junior year and hence had no effect on his eligibility. Similar things happened with the Rose situation and therefore very few know the facts versus hearsay.
Fortunately for you, the Willingham book is coming out in less than a week! You will get to learn all the facts.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
Serious question here, what all has been proven that the basketball program actually did? I know it's been shown players took the classes and that counselors placed some in those classes, but what else? It's hard to follow with so much he said she said, but I know some here know everything and know what's hearsay and what is actual facts. For example, I hear a lot about how McCants was kept eligible with the four As, but those were in the spring semester of his junior year and hence had no effect on his eligibility. Similar things happened with the Rose situation and therefore very few know the facts versus hearsay.
Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I know it's been shown players took the classes
what classes? you mean received grades.
besides cheating? who knows.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
but what else?
I'm not sure what qualifies as hearsay to you. Is the Wainstein report hearsay to you? The answer to your across-the=board question would be half as long as that report, and the only part of the scandal that I have paid attention to relates to AFAM classes.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
Serious question here, what all has been proven that the basketball program actually did? I know it's been shown players took the classes and that counselors placed some in those classes, but what else? It's hard to follow with so much he said she said, but I know some here know everything and know what's hearsay and what is actual facts. ....................................................
Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
Serious question here, what all has been proven that the basketball program actually did? I know it's been shown players took the classes and that counselors placed some in those classes, but what else? It's hard to follow with so much he said she said, but I know some here know everything and know what's hearsay and what is actual facts. For example, I hear a lot about how McCants was kept eligible with the four As, but those were in the spring semester of his junior year and hence had no effect on his eligibility. Similar things happened with the Rose situation and therefore very few know the facts versus hearsay.
Well, we do know UNC has lawyered up and spent a ton of money (and still counting) in an effort to keep it all quiet... for some reason???Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
Serious question here, what all has been proven that the basketball program actually did? I know it's been shown players took the classes and that counselors placed some in those classes, but what else? It's hard to follow with so much he said she said, but I know some here know everything and know what's hearsay and what is actual facts. For example, I hear a lot about how McCants was kept eligible with the four As, but those were in the spring semester of his junior year and hence had no effect on his eligibility. Similar things happened with the Rose situation and therefore very few know the facts versus hearsay.
Seems all you want to do is argue. The evidence is out there. On the scout board (Pack Pride) there's a downloadable file that contains the entire Wainstein report, including hundreds of emails, many of which are SMOKING GUNS where admins admit putting together 'fictitious' classes for these students, or where they conspire to commit Pell Grant fraud.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
Mary Willingham has a book coming out called Cheated. There is another book called Tarnished Heels. Go buy these 2 books and you will know everything you need to know. With all the pr money unc cheat is spending, you can bet your *** they would sue if it was not true. GBBOriginally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
They failed to charge Rose's brother ONE TIME for his traveling. He paid every single time before that and as soon as it was discovered in an audit, he paid it.Originally posted by reignof cats:
Mary Willingham has a book coming out called Cheated. There is another book called Tarnished Heels. Go buy these 2 books and you will know everything you need to know. With all the pr money unc cheat is spending, you can bet your *** they would sue if it was not true. GBBOriginally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
How can you call McCants' statements hearsay when he was directly involved in the scandal? Roy denied those claims but by your logic that would be just hearsay too. Either McCants or Roy is lying and since Roy has more motivation to not tell the truth, I tend to believe McCants.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
Why would McCants come out and say he didn't earn his grades? Maybe for money but I can't imagine he got a lot for that interview. I believe him over Roy.Originally posted by Lumpy 2:
How can you call McCants' statements hearsay when he was directly involved in the scandal? Roy denied those claims but by your logic that would be just hearsay too. Either McCants or Roy is lying and since Roy has more motivation to not tell the truth, I tend to believe McCants.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
Okay, you apparently didn't go to college, or if you did, you weren't an athlete. To be eligible for any particular semester, an athlete has to be taking classes. He has to take enough course hours to qualify. When I was in college, I had to take 12 hours to be eligible to run cross-country. I know the exact numbers have changed but the basic rule is the same.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
No, I went, no need to result to insults, just having a debate here. You implied the four AFAM classes he took in the spring helped keep him eligible. But that is not true. Had he failed everyone one of those classes he still would've have been eligible for the spring semester, correct? How then, would those classes help with his eligibility then? Which leads one to wonder why on earth, after he'd already declared for the draft, anyone would want to cheat to get him four As? He (McCants) said that at the end of the semester he picked up papers that were already written for him and turned them in. Also, I think you're also wrong or at the very least mistaken with what SACS has said. They did not throw those classes out, UNC offered to make it "right" for those who took the classes by giving them the opportunity to come back and take other courses.Originally posted by preacherfan:
Okay, you apparently didn't go to college, or if you did, you weren't an athlete. To be eligible for any particular semester, an athlete has to be taking classes. He has to take enough course hours to qualify. When I was in college, I had to take 12 hours to be eligible to run cross-country. I know the exact numbers have changed but the basic rule is the same.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I brought up the Rose situation as an example of a case where so much hearsay was out there that most don't know the facts, as was evident here on a thread last week (in addition to the comments made in that thread no one seems to know that even if you take away the SAT scandal Memphis still has to vacate games after early December because they failed to charge a family member for traveling, lodging and food). That is what I'm asking for here, facts. I've heard what McCant's has said but why should I believe him? He's said many crazy things over the years. The only factual evidence he supplied was that he took four AFAM courses the spring semester of the year he left school. Has it been proven that he in fact had tutor(s) write his papers or is that more things he has said. Also, preacher how on earth do those classes make him eligible for the same semester he took them? My interpretation is that he said Roy/UNC changed his transcript after the fall semester to make him eligible for the spring. Has this been shown? Finally, how do you know that the players didn't write their own papers? Isn't that what the NCAA is checking? I've read the emails in the Wainstein report, but those which involve violations come from football and women's basketball, I like everyone else am only interested in men's bb.
Since the classes were bogus, he was nothing more than a semi-pro bball player. He was NOT a student-athlete in any way other than in name. All the NCAA has to do is accept UNC***'s admission that those were bogus classes and accept what SACS has said that those classes can't be counted and BOOM! he is ineligible de facto.
SACS has ruled that those classes are not legit and UNC*** has to offer makeup classes. The NCAA can and should hammer your rears.
I agree with this. UNC and Cal are both just as guilty in the eyes of the NCAA -- that is not at all. What violation has Cal ever been hit with? None. Just like UNC (m bb) has yet to have any violations (in the past 60 years). However, will you still say UNC cheats and is corrupt even after the NCAA rules and nothing happens to their basketball team?Originally posted by Wildcat-in-STL:
Sorry UNC* fans... you don't get to scream out that Cal cheats and is shady and then try to weasel out of this scandal.
Its strange how when it comes to UK and Cal, the term proof is stretched to the point that accusations are proof... then when its UNC basketball on the line Proof is condensed to the point that only a signed confession by Roy Williams counts
You keep missing the point. Those were not real classes. They were created for the sole purpose of making them look like they were real so players could be eligible. How hard is it to understand that you cannot cannot cannot cannot compare that to taking real classes? McCants was NOT a real student in any sense of the word.No, I went, no need to result to insults, just having a debate here. You implied the four AFAM classes he took in the spring helped keep him eligible. But that is not true. Had he failed everyone one of those classes he still would've have been eligible for the spring semester, correct? How then, would those classes help with his eligibility then? Which leads one to wonder why on earth, after he'd already declared for the draft, anyone would want to cheat to get him four As? He (McCants) said that at the end of the semester he picked up papers that were already written for him and turned them in. Also, I think you're also wrong or at the very least mistaken with what SACS has said. They did not throw those classes out, UNC offered to make it "right" for those who took the classes by giving them the opportunity to come back and take other courses.
Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I agree with this. UNC and Cal are both just as guilty in the eyes of the NCAA -- that is not at all. What violation has Cal ever been hit with? None. Just like UNC (m bb) has yet to have any violations (in the past 60 years). However, will you still say UNC cheats and is corrupt even after the NCAA rules and nothing happens to their basketball team?Originally posted by Wildcat-in-STL:
Sorry UNC* fans... you don't get to scream out that Cal cheats and is shady and then try to weasel out of this scandal.
Its strange how when it comes to UK and Cal, the term proof is stretched to the point that accusations are proof... then when its UNC basketball on the line Proof is condensed to the point that only a signed confession by Roy Williams counts
Ridiculous. There is a difference between being innocent and a corrupt organization letting you off due to their bias, No one has ever done what UNC has been PROVEN TO DO! The NCAA has stated strict liability and you guys have done a systematic effort to cheat and keep players eligible. This isn't speculation of "did the coach know he took cash, jewelery, or his parents go a car?" No, this is the most corrupt thing in the history of college sports.
UNC fans are truly delusional. Let's see over the past few years, what has come to light.
- MAJOR ACADEMIC FRAUD STARTING UNDER DEAN SMITH GOING ALL THE WAY TO ROY WILLIAMS
- Heels for Wheels where multiple rental cars from a convicted felon have been ticketed while being driven by players and parked by the bball arena.
- BBall players tied to a mouth guard company ran by UNC dentist school employees if I'm not mistaken
- An ex player who was kicked off the team for character issues somehow being allowed to live in Roy William's house and set up with a bogus staff position (his character was too bad to be a player but not for a staff position..lol)
- Rashaad McCants transcript, Julius Peppers transcript
- Tyler Hansbroro's mom getting a BS job and abusing the funds while using the private jet to fly to every basketball game.
According to UNC fans, all of these things are just giant misunderstandings and no one knows anything even when the emails suggest otherwise or when an ex-player speaks out. This was all just coincidence or done by rogue employees who had nothing to gain,.
Has the fact that Cal has never been charged with an NCAA violation prevented fans of other schools from calling him a cheater? Has the fact that we haven't been charged with a violation in over 25 years stopped them from claiming UK is a dirty program? There is documented proof that UNC has been cheating for over 20 years so the school and all the coaches involved, including Dean, should be recognized for the cheaters they are.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I agree with this. UNC and Cal are both just as guilty in the eyes of the NCAA -- that is not at all. What violation has Cal ever been hit with? None. Just like UNC (m bb) has yet to have any violations (in the past 60 years). However, will you still say UNC cheats and is corrupt even after the NCAA rules and nothing happens to their basketball team?Originally posted by Wildcat-in-STL:
Sorry UNC* fans... you don't get to scream out that Cal cheats and is shady and then try to weasel out of this scandal.
Its strange how when it comes to UK and Cal, the term proof is stretched to the point that accusations are proof... then when its UNC basketball on the line Proof is condensed to the point that only a signed confession by Roy Williams counts
Dude, THE CLASS DIDN'T EXIST. PLAYERS WERE GIVEN GRADES FOR WORK THEY DID NOT DO! IT WAS A NO SHOW CLASS!Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
No, the classes were "real" classes as students were given credits for taking them, they were listed in the course catalogues, they required work, etc. The problem is that they were characterized as lecture-style courses when in fact they weren't. These are facts that are in the Wainstein report, and all of the other reports prior. Hence, I still don't see how you can say they kept him eligible, when he would have been just as eligible by taking 12 hours of advanced brain surgery and never showed up for anything. If this is the damming evidence surrounding the 05 title team then I don't see how they can do anything.
I don't follow the withdraw argument, why would he withdraw, he simpl had to enroll not do any work?
I didn't know the NCAA was keeping APR regulations then. If not, does it make sense to cheat to get McCant's four As when he doesn't need them?
Finally, yes we can argue what SACS should have done, but I am interested in what the actual facts are, and that is not open for debate, they did not throw out the classes.
Thanks for taking the time to respond and I look forward to hearing from you again.
Wait, when did the NCAA charge UNC basketball with a violation? UNC cheated according to which rules? Can't be the NCAA rules since they've yet to be found in violation of any rules. Of course this could all change. If UNC is not charge with any violations then how can you say "well they cheated but got away with it" yet get mad at others that say "Cal cheated but got away with it"?Originally posted by Lumpy 2:
Has the fact that Cal has never been charged with an NCAA violation prevented fans of other schools from calling him a cheater? Has the fact that we haven't been charged with a violation in over 25 years stopped them from claiming UK is a dirty program? There is documented proof that UNC has been cheating for over 20 years so the school and all the coaches involved, including Dean, should be recognized for the cheaters they are.Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I agree with this. UNC and Cal are both just as guilty in the eyes of the NCAA -- that is not at all. What violation has Cal ever been hit with? None. Just like UNC (m bb) has yet to have any violations (in the past 60 years). However, will you still say UNC cheats and is corrupt even after the NCAA rules and nothing happens to their basketball team?Originally posted by Wildcat-in-STL:
Sorry UNC* fans... you don't get to scream out that Cal cheats and is shady and then try to weasel out of this scandal.
Its strange how when it comes to UK and Cal, the term proof is stretched to the point that accusations are proof... then when its UNC basketball on the line Proof is condensed to the point that only a signed confession by Roy Williams counts
Originally posted by TruBluCatFan:
Why do you all keep feeding this troll. He doesn't want discussion he just wants to piss everyone off.
This guy is a troll and must have gone to UNC*** cheat. He just cannot understand what he reads.![]()
The mandatory publication of graduation rates came into effect in 1990 as a consequence of the "Student Right-to-Know Act," which attempted to create an environment in which universities would become more devoted to academics and hold athletes more accountable for academic success.[5]Originally posted by BobbyG_tickle_swerv:
I didn't know the NCAA was keeping APR regulations then. If not, does it make sense to cheat to get McCant's four As when he doesn't need them?
.