Crouch

WoodRiverJennings

All-American
Mar 4, 2013
7,313
5,136
113
Maybe I should have said supportive of Frost instead of positive... sorry for the escalated previous post.

Frost has all the support he needs. He just got an extension. He's not going anywhere, so Tommie tweeting negatively or some random SC_'sker on a message board saying he sucks isn't going to change anything.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,507
20,870
113
What I’m saying is that he’s unintentionally saying that Frost doesn’t have what it takes by saying it’s gonna take him 5 years.
I don’t think that is his intention, but I can see how it could be interpreted that way. 5 years is a long time, longer than I want to wait, for sure.
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
Frost has all the support he needs. He just got an extension. He's not going anywhere, so Tommie tweeting negatively or some random SC_'sker on a message board saying he sucks isn't going to change anything.
Yep, just tiring seeing the board after a loss. Need to probably save myself some heartache and wait 3 days before looking. But this damn board draws me back in every day.
 

WoodRiverJennings

All-American
Mar 4, 2013
7,313
5,136
113
Yep, just tiring seeing the board after a loss. Need to probably save myself some heartache and wait 3 days before looking. But this damn board draws me back in every day.

Is it more tiring seeing the board after a loss or watching another loss?
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,383
12,799
78
Is it more tiring seeing the board after a loss or watching another loss?
My problem isn't with critiquing specific moves or calls. My problem is just guys making the blanket statement that coach X sucks and will "never" get it done. I appreciate people who can break down plays and sequences and give intelligent reasons for why it didn't work or why they disagree with the game plan. I don't see much if any of that on here.
 

Huskerz99

Redshirt
Oct 27, 2019
1,512
0
0
My problem isn't with critiquing specific moves or calls. My problem is just guys making the blanket statement that coach X sucks and will "never" get it done. I appreciate people who can break down plays and sequences and give intelligent reasons for why it didn't work or why they disagree with the game plan. I don't see much if any of that on here.
Chinander sucks because he should not have given up 50 some yards in 25 seconds. He should have had the right players with the right call the last series. I disagree with the game plan the last series of letting them kick a field goal.
 

Bigredhunter

All-Conference
Mar 4, 2009
2,624
1,037
113
If WR is/was such a problem (yes it was) why did we not use Luke at WR yesterday? It is my understanding he worked there all week and wanted to play!
Plenty of players worked at WR all year but most didn't play! It's such a frustrating position for us.
 

GeorgeFlippin

Heisman
May 29, 2001
38,548
35,531
113
Chinander sucks because he should not have given up 50 some yards in 25 seconds. He should have had the right players with the right call the last series. I disagree with the game plan the last series of letting them kick a field goal.
That's called the "prevent the win defense."
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
Just ignore the trolls, then. I have no problem with it. There are people that are trolls, people that are just asses, people that pump sunshine into everything, and people that like to call things as they are. I prefer the people who call things as they are. Figure out what you prefer, and wade through the trash.
I know, I’m getting better at it, but still fail at times to wade well.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,383
12,799
78
That's called the "prevent the win defense."
I couldn't tell from the TV view what we were in but I was SHOUTING at the screen please NO PREVENT ZONE. The long pass completion that was overturned with Domann singled up I think puckered Chinander up. Sigh. It happens every weekend in the NFL too. IF we had gone cover zero and manned up and gotten burned people would have torched Chinander too.
 

WTFMatt

Senior
Feb 14, 2010
905
734
93
Yep, just tiring seeing the board after a loss. Need to probably save myself some heartache and wait 3 days before looking. But this damn board draws me back in every day.

Just pick your poison, and roll with it. There are people that are trolls, people that are just asses, people that pump sunshine into everything, people that are negative about everything, and people that like to call things as they are. I prefer the people who call things as they are. Figure out what you prefer, and either wade through the trash, or ignore it.
 

spinner4_rivals42045

All-Conference
Jan 29, 2003
6,139
1,819
0
Cheatman doesn’t say what will take 5 years. Maybe he’s saying in 5 years Frost will be canned. LOL

But Seriously headcard keep pumping sunshine. Obviously us fans don’t have a reason to feel disappointed in this staff and are too dam dumb to realize the “greatness” that’s being built. Geez man

I just got done watching Kansas State play in front of 100 people against a top 25 school, won the game and are going to a bowl. 3 freaking years in a row and no bowl. This is beyond disappointing. It shouldn’t take that freaking much to get 6 wins. Not in year 2. This staff has to win back the fans. We don’t owe them ****. But let’s keep pumping. I don’t want to be negative and this is the first time in my life I am not optimistic about our team next year. I’m just not a fool
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
Cheatman doesn’t say what will take 5 years. Maybe he’s saying in 5 years Frost will be canned. LOL

But Seriously headcard keep pumping sunshine. Obviously us fans don’t have a reason to feel disappointed in this staff and are too dam dumb to realize the “greatness” that’s being built. Geez man

I just got done watching Kansas State play in front of 100 people against a top 25 school, won the game and are going to a bowl. 3 freaking years in a row and no bowl. This is beyond disappointing. It shouldn’t take that freaking much to get 6 wins. Not in year 2. This staff has to win back the fans. We don’t owe them ****. But let’s keep pumping. I don’t want to be negative and this is the first time in my life I am not optimistic about our team next year. I’m just not a fool
I get that the fans owe them nothing. But really, what do they owe us? Seriously... I know fans pay money to go to the games, but if you feel this strongly, don’t spend the money. I don’t get the ideology that because you (in general, not specifically you) are a fan you have earned the right to crap all over coaches, players, admin, or whoever is the problem at the moment.

If you owe them nothing, why do they owe you something?
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,507
20,870
113
Cheatman doesn’t say what will take 5 years. Maybe he’s saying in 5 years Frost will be canned. LOL

But Seriously headcard keep pumping sunshine. Obviously us fans don’t have a reason to feel disappointed in this staff and are too dam dumb to realize the “greatness” that’s being built. Geez man

I just got done watching Kansas State play in front of 100 people against a top 25 school, won the game and are going to a bowl. 3 freaking years in a row and no bowl. This is beyond disappointing. It shouldn’t take that freaking much to get 6 wins. Not in year 2. This staff has to win back the fans. We don’t owe them ****. But let’s keep pumping. I don’t want to be negative and this is the first time in my life I am not optimistic about our team next year. I’m just not a fool
You can feel however the hell you want. Funny that you feel sharing Kenny’s tweet is “pumping sunshine”. I suppose you also feel Tommie’s tweet is “realistic”? And for the record I am not “pumping sunshine”, I have expressed my frustrations and concerns. But the name calling, blind rage, demands to fire everyone are not productive. Frost is here for a while and we need this to work out.
 
Jul 4, 2016
8,269
3,869
0
I couldn't tell from the TV view what we were in but I was SHOUTING at the screen please NO PREVENT ZONE. The long pass completion that was overturned with Domann singled up I think puckered Chinander up. Sigh. It happens every weekend in the NFL too. IF we had gone cover zero and manned up and gotten burned people would have torched Chinander too.

Safety was absolutely awful on that play.
 
Aug 6, 2009
15,511
9,089
0
I couldn't tell from the TV view what we were in but I was SHOUTING at the screen please NO PREVENT ZONE. The long pass completion that was overturned with Domann singled up I think puckered Chinander up. Sigh. It happens every weekend in the NFL too. IF we had gone cover zero and manned up and gotten burned people would have torched Chinander too.
My guess is Chinander geared his defense to taking away the sideline routes, knowing that Iowa has zero timeouts left. That left the middle vulnerable. Basically Iowa just out “athleted” us at that point. Their receiver and tight end were just better than our cover guys and we got beat. The sad fact, from our perspective, was that Stanley had not been that accurate most of the game, but suddenly found his range when he had to. That’s called having a QB who performs in the clutch, unlike us. Our QB ran out of bounds like a coward because he didn’t want to get hit OR just had a brain fart. Either way... for all of our mistakes in that game that single, bone-headed decision cost us the game.
 

spinner4_rivals42045

All-Conference
Jan 29, 2003
6,139
1,819
0
You can feel however the hell you want. Funny that you feel sharing Kenny’s tweet is “pumping sunshine”. I suppose you also feel Tommie’s tweet is “realistic”? And for the record I am not “pumping sunshine”, I have expressed my frustrations and concerns. But the name calling, blind rage, demands to fire everyone are not productive. Frost is here for a while and we need this to work out.

hey, I agree. Eventually we’ve got to get over Husker being awful and except what we got. Pissing and moaning doesn’t help the issue. It just sucks. And it’s extremely hard to find positives right now. Probably the worst it’s ever been
 

Hard4Corn

All-Conference
Aug 4, 2003
22,416
1,603
113
That's called the "prevent the win defense."
I don't think we were in prevent defense when we should have been. How else do you explain a receiver getting m2m coverage down the sideline with no safety help over the top. We were lucky that play was called an incomplete pass. Then on the next play I'm screaming at the TV because our linebackers are only 5 yards off the ball when they should have been at least 10 yards deep. I think we might have played our regular D when we should have been in prevent.
 

Wyldcard

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2018
9,727
2,691
0
Exactly!

Not quite as quick as the insanely fast TMart but still very, VERY fast "and" not scared to run the ball.
Enter Logan Smothers. TM speed and a better arm than Luke. By the way TM was faster than Crouch but not as tough
 

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
Enter Logan Smothers. TM speed and a better arm than Luke. By the way TM was faster than Crouch but not as tough

Well duh......no sh*t that TM was quicker than Crouch. He's the quickest NU player I've ever seen. But Crouch was still VERY fast indeed. That TMart wasn't tough as nails is just your opinion only.
 

SoFL Husker

All-Conference
Sep 16, 2017
8,101
3,691
0
U couldn’t leave Luke in there after a game changing effort at that point of the game. That might hurt the future Heisman trophy winning QB’s feelings and Luke is not the chosen one and needs to wait for his time regardless if he is the one QB that changed the tone of the entire game after three quarters. Luke cannot be trusted and all the fans crying for Luuuuuuke don’t understand the plan

Bingo.
 

Wyldcard

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2018
9,727
2,691
0
Well duh......no sh*t that TM was quicker than Crouch. He's the quickest NU player I've ever seen. But Crouch was still VERY fast indeed. That TMart wasn't tough as nails is just your opinion only.
Re-read as I said TM wasn't as tough as Crouch. I never said TM wasn't tough, I jut said he wasn't as tough as Crouch
 

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
Re-read as I said TM wasn't as tough as Crouch. I never said TM wasn't tough, I jut said he wasn't as tough as Crouch

What's the need to re-read? I have the very highest respect for both of them and have no idea which was "tougher". They both were simply sensational. That's all.....
 

bigboxes

All-American
Sep 4, 2004
46,209
6,744
113
That TMart wasn't tough as nails is just your opinion only.

My opinion was well. Crouch had everything that TM didn't. He could cut, juke and be physical when he had. TM could do NONE of those things. He was quick, but only in a straight line. Once opposing D's figured out this one trick pony there was no more magic. TM couldn't lead, couldn't pass (arm punts anyone?) and wilted under pressure. Eric on the other hand may have been the greatest to ever play under center if he had the supporting staff that Frazier had. Not to mention the handicap for having Solich as your coach.
 

bshirt73

Senior
Aug 31, 2014
2,853
806
0
My opinion was well. Crouch had everything that TM didn't. He could cut, juke and be physical when he had. TM could do NONE of those things. He was quick, but only in a straight line. Once opposing D's figured out this one trick pony there was no more magic. TM couldn't lead, couldn't pass (arm punts anyone?) and wilted under pressure. Eric on the other hand may have been the greatest to ever play under center if he had the supporting staff that Frazier had. Not to mention the handicap for having Solich as your coach.

Oh my God.....you can't possibly be serious. Let's look at possibly the two best years for both. 1999 for Crouch & 2012 for TMart.....

1999 Crouch...889 yds running (16 TDs).....1269 yds passing (7 TDs)

2012 TMart....1019 yds running (10 TDs)....2871 yds passing (23 TDs)

I guess you assume Bo was a far, far better coach than Frank? For the other side of the ball, Crouch's 1999 blackshirts were without doubt a way, wayyyyyyy better defense than what we had in 2012. Arguably the same with the OLines.

Anyways, once again, they were both simply terrific.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,507
20,870
113
Well duh......no sh*t that TM was quicker than Crouch. He's the quickest NU player I've ever seen. But Crouch was still VERY fast indeed. That TMart wasn't tough as nails is just your opinion only.
 

Dean Pope

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2001
13,288
1,055
0
How do you know that?
Well, it's tough not to be. Whether it's the throw it up for grabs as you are falling to the turf on a 1st & 10 judgment play that Taylor Martinez was known for or the patented "if I'm not in the game, I'll stand by myself with a hood over my head and not pay much attention to the game" leadership example that he set, it's a very low bar for a McCaffrey to jump over. With the impression that Luke has made on the staff and team, I would say that he's already a better leader. And given his track record of studying film and the playbook, again not a strong point of TM to put it lightly, I would say his decision making will be excellent.
 

bigboxes

All-American
Sep 4, 2004
46,209
6,744
113
Oh my God.....you can't possibly be serious. Let's look at possibly the two best years for both. 1999 for Crouch & 2012 for TMart.....

1999 Crouch...889 yds running (16 TDs).....1269 yds passing (7 TDs)

2012 TMart....1019 yds running (10 TDs)....2871 yds passing (23 TDs)

I guess you assume Bo was a far, far better coach than Frank? For the other side of the ball, Crouch's 1999 blackshirts were without doubt a way, wayyyyyyy better defense than what we had in 2012. Arguably the same with the OLines.

Anyways, once again, they were both simply terrific.

Bo was not a better coach than Frank. The goal is conference championships and competing for national championships. We weren't going to either with Bo or Frank. Nine wins only gets you so far in modern football. A whale trophy to be exact.
 
Last edited:

CC_Lemming

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2001
4,023
1,441
0
Well, it's tough not to be. Whether it's the throw it up for grabs as you are falling to the turf on a 1st & 10 judgment play that Taylor Martinez was known for or the patented "if I'm not in the game, I'll stand by myself with a hood over my head and not pay much attention to the game" leadership example that he set, it's a very low bar for a McCaffrey to jump over. With the impression that Luke has made on the staff and team, I would say that he's already a better leader. And given his track record of studying film and the playbook, again not a strong point of TM to put it lightly, I would say his decision making will be excellent.

Sorry, I misread your post. I thought you were talking about Adrian. No disagreement about TM.
 

huskrz1

Freshman
Dec 19, 2001
466
71
0
Bo was not a better coach than Frank. The goal is conference championships and competing for national championships. We weren't going to either with Bo or Frank. Nine wins only gets you so far in modern football. A whale trophy to be exact.
I sure would the f would take 8/9 wins now boys....he’ll bros and bras I would a bowl appearance at this point. Don’t talk championships yet...baby steps and let’s get to 500% first?! Low bar for now and excellence again down the road
 
May 29, 2001
5,248
472
68
Luke is electric running the ball. Not quite Taylor Martinez electric, but I suspect Luke is a better passer and a tougher runner.
He must get his shot this spring.
Sure hope he gets a legit shot at winning the job in the spring. The whole tempo of the offense seems to change with him at QB.