Crushing testimony

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,247
3,307
113
You couldn’t have provided a more perfect example to summarize what every one of these testimonies have been. You took something that wasn’t said, you applied your inferior intellect in an attempt to summarize as YOU understand things and project it as fact. It’s 100% what we’ve seen day in and day out. That my friend, is not a case. That is called speculation, innuendo, presumptions, or put another way, nonsensical ********.

You finally got something right. Hahahahha
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
It's time to get this farce over with. Everyone knows the Democrat controlled House is going to vote for impeachment whether or not it's warranted, and everyone also knows that the Republican controlled Senate will not vote to remove Trump from office. I say end the hearings, put it up for a vote, send it to the Senate, and let Congress focus on the matters that actually mean something to the American people.

I disagree. We are certainly learning a lot about how this corrupt president operated and who all was involved. It's just a simple shame the administration is ignoring subpoenas. I wish the Dems would not have withdrawn their legal challenge on the subpoenas. I would have loved to have seen this go to the courts to rule that the administration cannot ignore subpoenas from Congress. Then we could have seen many more people come and testify. I know it would really drag this out and that is the sole reason the Dems withdrew, but we Americans would get a much better and more complete understanding of the truth.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,156
113
The money was held up....... that is direct evidence. My god how do you function in this world?

Did Ukraine get the money? Yes. Did the U.S. get anything out of it? No.

Do you actually think this is going to bring down Trump? Rather than resort to childish insults, just tell me what you think the end result is going to be.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You won't see this clip on CNN.


That’s absolutely correct. They don’t spew ridiculous and utter nonsense that is completely false.

Friend, ask yourself this. If trump is innocent, why did he block so many requests for records from the State Department, from the White House, from the NSC and blocked people from testifying?

It is a very simple question that has a very logical explanation.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,103
113
That’s absolutely correct. They don’t spew ridiculous and utter nonsense that is completely false.

Friend, ask yourself this. If trump is innocent, why did he block so many requests for records from the State Department, from the White House, from the NSC and blocked people from testifying?

It is a very simple question that has a very logical explanation.

Go sit down dumbass even the Daily Beast is clowning CNN.

 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,289
113
That’s absolutely correct. They don’t spew ridiculous and utter nonsense that is completely false.

Friend, ask yourself this. If trump is innocent, why did he block so many requests for records from the State Department, from the White House, from the NSC and blocked people from testifying?

It is a very simple question that has a very logical explanation.

Oh I agree with you he is guilty as Sin.

Of what?
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
That’s absolutely correct. They don’t spew ridiculous and utter nonsense that is completely false.

Friend, ask yourself this. If trump is innocent, why did he block so many requests for records from the State Department, from the White House, from the NSC and blocked people from testifying?

It is a very simple question that has a very logical explanation.

Because he can keep them from wasting their time in partisan gimmicks. And they all lived happily ever after.

The end
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,247
3,307
113
That’s absolutely correct. They don’t spew ridiculous and utter nonsense that is completely false.

Friend, ask yourself this. If trump is innocent, why did he block so many requests for records from the State Department, from the White House, from the NSC and blocked people from testifying?

It is a very simple question that has a very logical explanation.
A. To frustrate Dems
B. To not open his administration up to ridiculous fishing expeditions. If you are an attorney, I think you understand in scenarios like what Schiff is running, it’s similar to a deposition. There would be so many ridiculous discovery attempts by the Dems not to mention the televised gotcha questions which the advisors would be restricted from answering but would make for great TV in a sound bite-a-palooza.

If you watch and understand politics at all, this isn’t new. And this is why.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,289
113
Americans would get a much better and more complete understanding of the truth.

What is it? What's "the Truth" the Democrats have exposed and will impeach Trump over to send him back to Mar-a-Lago?

C' mon country...just lay out the Dem's case...what's so hard about that?
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,289
113
Because he can keep them from wasting their time in partisan gimmicks. And they all lived happily ever after.

The end

Their case was so air tight & convincing, they even convinced Nancy to hold a partisan impeachment vote she said would end in failure!

Strong stuff!
 

old buzzard

Senior
Dec 30, 2005
6,296
641
113

Whatever happened to a candidate refusing to accept the result of an election? Didn't Hillary say that was a threat to our democracy? And here we are 3 years later and Democrats sole mission is to try to unseat a duly elected President.

 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,289
113

After 3 days of public hearings, the Democrat's sham impeachment hearings are a ratings bust!

ABC ended its coverage of today's hearing shortly after 11 AM.

CBS shortly after 2 PM.

It looked like NBC might air the whole hearing...but they cut out early for @TheEllenShow

Who wants to sit around listening to a bunch of self appointed narcissistic blow hards patting themselves on the back? Besides, when they were asked what evidence any of 'em had to indict Trump, they all had nothing to say except what they "imagined" or heard someone else say! [eyeroll]
 
Last edited: