CSN: Growing concern with scheduling

ClownBaby

Heisman
Oct 26, 2006
21,607
74,810
113
I really think it is time for IHSA to go to districts broken up by enrollment and geography, play an 8 game district schedule with 1 non district game scheduled by the schools so they can keep prior rivalries intact. Every 4-6 years re- district based on enrollment changes.

Something has to change because the current system is broken and only getting worse by the year.
 

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,846
2,728
0
"How about letting the IHSA take over scheduling?"

No thanks! I still like the schools to have the power to do the scheduling.

Wassup
 

godfthr53

All-Conference
Sep 8, 2008
4,961
2,775
113
I really think it is time for IHSA to go to districts broken up by enrollment and geography, play an 8 game district schedule with 1 non district game scheduled by the schools so they can keep prior rivalries intact. Every 4-6 years re- district based on enrollment changes.

Something has to change because the current system is broken and only getting worse by the year.
OR 8 games and everyone makes the playoffs like other sports.
 

mc140

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
8,753
2,807
113
This state is losing kids by the thousands every year. Enrollments are dropping in most places, some faster than others. This will lead to a continuing shift in conferences.
 

MR. "T"

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2008
312
156
0
You want to stop scheduling problems, figure out a way for everyone to make the playoffs, no matter how many classes you have!
 

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,846
2,728
0
The regular season is for finding the top teams to enter into the playoffs. The playoffs are not for every team. You have to earn it. It's up to each school to determine which conference is best for them and their students and who to play in the non-conference games.

Football is also not all about being the champion. It's about molding students teaching them life lessons on the field that they can transfer to everyday life for the rest of their lives.

Wassup
 
Last edited:

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,846
2,728
0
So is the bball regular season just "preseason"?

Yes, those who created the basketball playoffs are all angry Cub fans who felt the only way the Cubs could make the playoffs over the last 100 years is for everybody to make the playoffs regardless of what they did in the regular season. It's the "Everybody Deserves A Trophy Mentality".

Wassup
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmca

PowerI66_

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2012
3,943
2,894
0
Yes, those who created the basketball playoffs are all angry Cub fans who felt the only way the Cubs could make the playoffs over the last 100 years is for everybody to make the playoffs regardless of what they did in the regular season.

 

dtlove3434

Freshman
Jun 8, 2014
118
92
0
Everybody makes the playoff in basketball because you can play more than one game in a week. You cant play every 2 days in football. That is the ONLY reason they don't have every team make the playoffs.
 

COMMITTOTHEGRIND

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2016
43
10
0
But you use to have a game Wednesday then right back at it Saturday...... Either way not everyone should make the playoffs in football there would be sooooooo many routes n just awful games
 

SiuCubFan8

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2007
5,525
3,449
113
Football is also not all about being the champion. It's about molding students teaching them life lessons on the field that they can transfer to everyday life for the rest of their lives.

Wassup

If there was some configuration of 8 games and everyone makes the playoffs there will be no "molding students teaching them life lessons on the field that they can transfer to everyday life for the rest of their lives?"

I don't buy that for one second.
 

Voodoo Tatum 21

All-Conference
May 18, 2016
2,970
1,765
0
iF everyone made the playoffs - there would be some dangerous games in the first rounds with teams so overmatched that safety comes into play.

The "everyone gets a playoff trophy" is also not real life. You have to earn things in the real world.

If you really wanted to have everyone make the playoffs - have a couple of preseason games to help with seeding and then playoffs start in mid/late sept. The public teams that lose then go into a losers bracket so they can play their 9 games and the privates head to the prep bowl which I think they do now when they get knocked from the playoffs.
 

ignazio

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2007
3,837
2,878
0
Is the purpose of high school sports to find the single greatest individual(s) or is it to give athletic opportunity to the greatest number of individuals?

I don't think those are mutually exclusive goals. I think we can have everyone in, with Week 9 becoming round one - BUT - it has to be fair: the records - and the strength of schedule should be taken into account when seeding the brackets. No more of this 9-0 CPS team counting the same as everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SiuCubFan8

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,846
2,728
0
I think if you have every team make the playoffs in IL eventually a multi-state, maybe Midwestern states playoff system would develop and the usual strong teams in the state will opt out of the IL playoff system and instead enter the multi-state championship playoffs. Just my take on it.

Thus the IL all-in playoff system would turn into the minor league playoff system.

Wassup
 

illini14

Sophomore
Jun 12, 2014
468
117
0
I think if you have every team make the playoffs in IL eventually a multi-state, maybe Midwestern states playoff system would develop and the usual strong teams in the state will opt out of the IL playoff system and instead enter the multi-state championship playoffs. Just my take on it.

Thus the IL all-in playoff system would turn into the minor league playoff system.

Wassup
Is this a joke?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SiuCubFan8

SiuCubFan8

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2007
5,525
3,449
113
I think if you have every team make the playoffs in IL eventually a multi-state, maybe Midwestern states playoff system would develop and the usual strong teams in the state will opt out of the IL playoff system and instead enter the multi-state championship playoffs. Just my take on it.

Thus the IL all-in playoff system would turn into the minor league playoff system.

Wassup
Why would the strong teams opt out?
 

HRCJR

Senior
Jun 30, 2014
477
410
0
In my opinion a lot of the scheduling issues could be solved by having a true strength of schedule factor built into the playoff seeding. In 2015, if team would have lost to both Whitney Young and Loyola Academy they would have received the same number of Playoff Points - 9. The LA points should be worth much more than the WY points.

Use one of the national computer polls or a combination of computer polls for the seeding. Reward teams that schedule tough games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voodoo Tatum 21

Voodoo Tatum 21

All-Conference
May 18, 2016
2,970
1,765
0
In my opinion a lot of the scheduling issues could be solved by having a true strength of schedule factor built into the playoff seeding. In 2015, if team would have lost to both Whitney Young and Loyola Academy they would have received the same number of Playoff Points - 9. The LA points should be worth much more than the WY points.

Use one of the national computer polls or a combination of computer polls for the seeding. Reward teams that schedule tough games.

That's a great idea that would solve some of the problems. How does the college system do it? I'm sure a 9-0 FCS team does not rank as high as a 9-0 FBS team - but how do they determine "team strength" accross divisions like FBS and FCS?
 

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,846
2,728
0
Strength of schedule is not the issue with a all-in playoff schedule. The problem with a all-in playoff schedule is the pre-season games which are the first 8-9 games of the season are meaningless.

Then you have weeks 9-12 or 10-13 in which the strong teams will play 1-2 added blowout games in the playoffs in addition to the 2 games of blowout football they are already playing in the 1st and 2nd round of the current playoff system (in which the power teams blowout the opponents by at least 5 TD's). So with the all-in method the power teams will now have their first 4 playoff games as blowout games instead of the current system when some have 2 blowout games already.

With the all-in approach the power teams are now playing meaningless football for the first 12-13 games of the season. These power teams will be looking for competition somewhere else and a very competitive multi-state playoff system would likely emerge and IL playoff football is going to look aweful.

I know the state is bankrupt and the IHSA wants to make more $$ with more playoff games but let's not ruin IL High School football.

Wassup
 
Last edited:

HRCJR

Senior
Jun 30, 2014
477
410
0
I know the state is bankrupt and the IHSA wants to make more $$ with more playoff games but let's not ruin IL High School football.

Wassup

What is the connection between the state of Illinois being bankrupt and the IHSA wanting more playoff games (which as of right now is not the case)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SiuCubFan8

oldfan123

Redshirt
Jun 20, 2013
194
29
0
Look at the forfeits each year with CPS not having enough to play or dropping football all together.Teams like Harvard suffer and lose a home game and home gate.I think Illinois needs to start football the same week as Indiana.Not sure on the all in the playoffs thing but who knows.
 

chuck998

Junior
Aug 11, 2014
410
222
0
Interesting topic. In noticed that Rock Island HS, which made the 7A playoffs last year, has an open date on Oct 21. How will that impact their playoff prospects or seeding?