FIFYUnnamed and Unsubstantiated Source (though as with most clickbait headlines- probably the writer of this piece): Wake Forest, agent for Danny Manning start buyout negotiations
LINK
Why is an article with no facts or on record statements about the rumor on March 3rd (approximately seven weeks before Manning was actually fired) that lawyers/agents are negotiating when there's nothing to negotiate? And why haven’t any verifiable facts or conclusions been disclosed in the Two plus months since this piece was written? (Logical Answer: Because it's not true)
Yes, you are correct he had no options because someone wrote a terrible contract.Petrino's lawyers worked at most for 24 hours, which is how long it took "Vince" to fork over 100% of his buyout.
The narrative was not whether lawyers were involved. It was that "Vince' had no options...
That's the narrative. Has nothing to do with the truth...Yes, you are correct he had no options because someone wrote a terrible contract.
FIFY again.Only clowns argue by equating innuendo with facts...
Only clowns don’t recognize facts...FIFY again.
Again, it is absurd that you would continue to suggest that the March article you’ve linked about Manning contains any factual information save the bit about him (probably) having a lawyer. The rest of the article is pure conjecture and reads like a message board post.
I couldn’t agree more. Now stare into the mirror and repeat that 500 more times and hopefully it’ll sink in.Only clowns don’t recognize facts...