maybe the question should be, who has been teaching him these three years?He's had 3 years to learn not to stand straight up on the snap of the ball. Doubt a redshirt year would have helped.
maybe the question should be, who has been teaching him these three years?He's had 3 years to learn not to stand straight up on the snap of the ball. Doubt a redshirt year would have helped.
iirc Clemson has a 320 lb freshman defensive lineman that is doing pretty goodDespite the positive spin, he is still far too heavy. He still has not been coached to instinctively avoid standing up. He needs to lose 30 lbs minimum. There is only so much a coach can do. Ultimately, it falls on the player. He would have way more of a motor if some of the fat and fluid left his frame.
He needed a more experienced DC from the very beginning.Allowing the kid to play his freshman year was a huge coaching mistake. Even if it was promised it was easy to see that he was too heavy and out of shape to be out there. He needed the truth more then pats on the back because without breaking his bad eating habits and not making him be in the weight room 24/7 has probably taken away any dream that he had for the next level. He does look better but this should have been where he was at after a red shirt year not his junior year.
He needed a more experienced DC from the very beginning.
You may be right...but Elam did lose 30 pounds last year...if he could have 2 more years to get down another 20 pounds he'd likely be more effective. But by not RSing him in year 1 and it appears he didn't dedicate himself in year 2...now in year 3 he still needs some significant body make over to play in SEC. Another year wouldn't have hurt that.
You could move this thread to a UL message board and it would fit right in.
Agreed. I think Matt has worked hard to do as much as he can. He was rated as a 5 star because he was good a single thing. Unfortunately UK needs him to be a play maker and not a space eater.I have been critical of ME since watching his HS tape, he is a big stiff dude that dominated in HS because of sheer size. But damn guys, he didn't give himself his ranking, it was someone else who did it. He isn't the first who hasn't lived up to his ranking and won't be the last.
They don't ask him to get stats. They ask him to occupy blockers and keep the linebackers clean. He's not in there to blow plays up by making the big tackle.I hate to be hard on the kid but that is his stat line almost every game - he does very little , has never ever did anything - maybe the biggest bust ever
Two years ago maybe, glad you guys have come around.
And Willie, you are right about the O-line, which is where Bama and Louisville were recruiting him and why he did not commit to Bama. I know he was never coming to Louisville, I did not think it was a bad thing he didn't. He just doesn't have the skill set to play DT, never did.
Agreed. I think Matt has worked hard to do as much as he can. He was rated as a 5 star because he was good a single thing. Unfortunately UK needs him to be a play maker and not a space eater.
This is correct. Here are some of his rankings in high school:Am I wrong but wasn't there considerable disparity in ratings of Elam coming out of high school? He was not a consensus four star if I remember correctly?
To be fair, Elam may have been GREAT at Bama if you factor in the All-SEC and/or All-American players on either side of him at DE and behind him at LB (football is a TEAM sport).he did have better options as far as other schools go. But one thing that would have happened at other schools as he would have been forced to transfer out. If he had gone to Alabama Saban would not tolerate him not being able to live up to expectations.
And a 4 star on some services and a 5 star on others. Are we only to use Rivals? I don't see them as any more accurate than the others. I've always felt 247's rankings are the closest personally.He was a 3 star on Rivals
I've made that same point on several occasions. Elam was considered a great prospect by some because he was really good at keeping blockers off the LBs behind him not because he could make plays himself. At Bama he might actually look like an All American. At UK keeping blockers off our LBs doesn't really do much as Love isn't making plays whether he is blocked or not. Elam doesn't have the support behind him to make him look good.To be fair, Elam may have been GREAT at Bama if you factor in the All-SEC and/or All-American players on either side of him at DE and behind him at LB (football is a TEAM sport).
To be fair, Elam may have been GREAT at Bama if you factor in the All-SEC and/or All-American players on either side of him at DE and behind him at LB (football is a TEAM sport).
And a 4 star on some services and a 5 star on others. Are we only to use Rivals? I don't see them as any more accurate than the others. I've always felt 247's rankings are the closest personally.