Did Elam even play?

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
27,982
30,117
113
He's had 3 years to learn not to stand straight up on the snap of the ball. Doubt a redshirt year would have helped.
maybe the question should be, who has been teaching him these three years?
 

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
27,982
30,117
113
Despite the positive spin, he is still far too heavy. He still has not been coached to instinctively avoid standing up. He needs to lose 30 lbs minimum. There is only so much a coach can do. Ultimately, it falls on the player. He would have way more of a motor if some of the fat and fluid left his frame.
iirc Clemson has a 320 lb freshman defensive lineman that is doing pretty good
 

UKCatNnc

All-Conference
Sep 30, 2005
6,163
1,736
0
Allowing the kid to play his freshman year was a huge coaching mistake. Even if it was promised it was easy to see that he was too heavy and out of shape to be out there. He needed the truth more then pats on the back because without breaking his bad eating habits and not making him be in the weight room 24/7 has probably taken away any dream that he had for the next level. He does look better but this should have been where he was at after a red shirt year not his junior year.
He needed a more experienced DC from the very beginning.
 

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
Am I wrong but wasn't there considerable disparity in ratings of Elam coming out of high school? He was not a consensus four star if I remember correctly?
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
He needed a more experienced DC from the very beginning.

That is probably a very accurate statement. Elam needed a strong stern presence as a freshman to make him realize how much work he had to do and I'm not sure Elliot would have been that kind of coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKCatNnc

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
You may be right...but Elam did lose 30 pounds last year...if he could have 2 more years to get down another 20 pounds he'd likely be more effective. But by not RSing him in year 1 and it appears he didn't dedicate himself in year 2...now in year 3 he still needs some significant body make over to play in SEC. Another year wouldn't have hurt that.

K time, I agree with you. I know its easy to say after the fact but it was VERY obvious that he was too heavy and too out of shape to make a real difference his freshman year so I think he missed a great opportunity to play at the next level by NOT red shirting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKCatNnc

Naga Saki

Redshirt
Jun 3, 2002
743
23
0
You could move this thread to a UL message board and it would fit right in.

Two years ago maybe, glad you guys have come around.

And Willie, you are right about the O-line, which is where Bama and Louisville were recruiting him and why he did not commit to Bama. I know he was never coming to Louisville, I did not think it was a bad thing he didn't. He just doesn't have the skill set to play DT, never did.
 

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,331
0
I have been critical of ME since watching his HS tape, he is a big stiff dude that dominated in HS because of sheer size. But damn guys, he didn't give himself his ranking, it was someone else who did it. He isn't the first who hasn't lived up to his ranking and won't be the last.
Agreed. I think Matt has worked hard to do as much as he can. He was rated as a 5 star because he was good a single thing. Unfortunately UK needs him to be a play maker and not a space eater.
 

Mikey Likes It

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2007
11,247
3,776
0
I hate to be hard on the kid but that is his stat line almost every game - he does very little , has never ever did anything - maybe the biggest bust ever
They don't ask him to get stats. They ask him to occupy blockers and keep the linebackers clean. He's not in there to blow plays up by making the big tackle.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,925
60,325
113
Two years ago maybe, glad you guys have come around.

And Willie, you are right about the O-line, which is where Bama and Louisville were recruiting him and why he did not commit to Bama. I know he was never coming to Louisville, I did not think it was a bad thing he didn't. He just doesn't have the skill set to play DT, never did.

Look, I think UL fans are babies when they don't have to be crybabies. I think that is the greatest affirmation of the little brother syndrome. Your team is dramatically better than UK, but you still act like you get no respect and feel the need to tear down your big brother at every turn. I am not saying the little brother claim is factual, but UL message board posters make the case every single day of the year.

I don't think Bama was recruiting Elam to the OLine. I think that is wrong. I think it typical for fans to think that someone, especially someone with height, who is not cutting it on defense line should move to OLine. Especially UL fans, because they remember Howard repeatedly doing that. I too thought Elam would end up on the OLine, but now that I see him, I do not think he would make a good OLineman.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
He reminds me of one of those kids that got forced into football because of his size and strength, but really does not like the sport. Never looks to me like he wants to be on the field.

He was wildly overrated in HS because he was competing against inferior Kentucky schoolboy competition. But, man, he's really been exposed as a fraud at the college level. Way too soft, way too slow, way too apathetic.
 
Last edited:

EnPassant

Heisman
May 29, 2001
52,495
14,066
18
Agreed. I think Matt has worked hard to do as much as he can. He was rated as a 5 star because he was good a single thing. Unfortunately UK needs him to be a play maker and not a space eater.

He was a 3 star on Rivals
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Am I wrong but wasn't there considerable disparity in ratings of Elam coming out of high school? He was not a consensus four star if I remember correctly?
This is correct. Here are some of his rankings in high school:

247Sports - 9th overall and No. 2 at DT
Rivals - three-star and No. 26 at DT
ESPN - 292nd overall and No. 24 at DT
Scout - No. 12 among DT's
 

jimlowe7

Freshman
Nov 15, 2005
1,030
58
0
he did have better options as far as other schools go. But one thing that would have happened at other schools as he would have been forced to transfer out. If he had gone to Alabama Saban would not tolerate him not being able to live up to expectations.
To be fair, Elam may have been GREAT at Bama if you factor in the All-SEC and/or All-American players on either side of him at DE and behind him at LB (football is a TEAM sport).
 

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,331
0
He was a 3 star on Rivals
And a 4 star on some services and a 5 star on others. Are we only to use Rivals? I don't see them as any more accurate than the others. I've always felt 247's rankings are the closest personally.
 

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,331
0
To be fair, Elam may have been GREAT at Bama if you factor in the All-SEC and/or All-American players on either side of him at DE and behind him at LB (football is a TEAM sport).
I've made that same point on several occasions. Elam was considered a great prospect by some because he was really good at keeping blockers off the LBs behind him not because he could make plays himself. At Bama he might actually look like an All American. At UK keeping blockers off our LBs doesn't really do much as Love isn't making plays whether he is blocked or not. Elam doesn't have the support behind him to make him look good.
 

*Bleedingblue*

Heisman
Mar 5, 2009
39,688
30,564
113
To be fair, Elam may have been GREAT at Bama if you factor in the All-SEC and/or All-American players on either side of him at DE and behind him at LB (football is a TEAM sport).


Doubt it. You think saban has a magic elixor for him to drink and magically become quicker?
Saban has guys transferring out all the time like any other coach does.
 

Jon(-24)

Senior
Nov 25, 2007
1,635
576
0
If he had committed to Alabama, he would be having a monster season right now at Grambling State.
 

Kooky Kats_anon

Heisman
Aug 17, 2002
25,741
46,563
0
The kid burned his redshirt. His sophomore year he was still out of shape and under coached based on weight and poor technique.

I don't think he's too bad this year. We have little at DE/DT in his support.
Is he getting doubled? No.
Will he be awesome? No.

But at this time, I'll take solid - and I think he can get there by year's end.
 

EnPassant

Heisman
May 29, 2001
52,495
14,066
18
And a 4 star on some services and a 5 star on others. Are we only to use Rivals? I don't see them as any more accurate than the others. I've always felt 247's rankings are the closest personally.

All services miss on kids and clearly that kid was at best a 3 star. He's always been ineffective and even those who made excuses over excuses for his bad play have pretty much stopped. DL have to be disruptive and he's never been even against FCS teams.