Did I sleep through H1N1 pandemic?

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
We were told 2.2 million could die, which created the hysteria.

You’re using the presumption I think there is no virus, and people aren’t getting sick, that absolutely isn’t true.

This notion you’re promoting is going to lead to more govt intrusion in our lives.

We don’t have the official death count yet as the CDC numbers don’t match the media numbers.
We were not told millions WOULD die, we were told that IF we did nothing THEN millions would die from the virus. We were also told that If we practiced social distancing, THEN we could mitigate the infection rate. Don't be making stuff to fit your narrative.
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,257
74,453
0
We were not told millions WOULD die, we were told that IF we did nothing THEN millions would die from the virus. We were also told that If we practiced social distancing, THEN we could mitigate the infection rate. Don't be making stuff to fit your narrative.


[laughing]
 

rqa

New member
Sep 10, 2002
3,011
1,668
0
I've been right all along, you can check the post history, not that I believe it's a conspiracy (since belief implies certainty from imperfect facts/knowledge) but it's certainly plausible maybe even probable he's right.

Who benefits? Qui bono?

Come on. [eyeroll]

The end game for communism is world communism and that's what the Chinese government wants... this is a cold war... everybody who pays attention (not you) understands this.

What you (your side) thought was the best way to tackle that threat was through globalism: encourage them to become Communist capitalists and then from there you could convince them into adopting freedom. Everything that happens is essentially a part of this cold war, whether the virus itself is incidental, coincidental or accidental is really immaterial.

What do I think is most probable? THe virus was accidental, the world leaders got scared and overreacted to bad modeling from the scientific community or at the very best they figured there was sufficient reasoning to take the necessary precautions we did (which I supported), such that any real threat to our nation would be squelched by scaring everyone straight such that we had sufficient resources as a nation to cover for our hotspots like NO, NYC, the northeast corridor as whole whatever.

Oh dude! Perhaps you should go back and better study just who was responsible for opening up trade with China. Hint: they weren’t “my side”.

Congrats! You just graduated to kook status.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuporChin

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
15,086
11,447
0
Oh dude! Perhaps you should go back and better study just who was responsible for opening up trade with China. Hint: they weren’t “my side”.

Congrats! You just graduated to kook status.

My criticisms aren't exclusive to one party, nor am I concerned by what you may deem as quackery.

You're wrong here just like you're wrong everywhere else.

The evidence, then and now, is insufficient to sustain your position.
 

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
Again, we don’t have a parallel universe to compare no action vs actions taken. And frankly, we don’t know how many will end up dying. 3.5 weeks ago less than 100 had died, today 15,000 have died and the rate continues to climb. It’s hitting NYC hard right now...what if it hits Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston, Philadelphia, Miami, etc equally hard? Can you assure us it won’t?
They are building out mobile hospitals in Louisville and Lexington in anticipation of increased need.

This isn’t the first time government has “intruded” into the lives of Americans. They took even more severe intrusions during WWII not to mention the Civil War. Did you have a problem with those?
Is it your claim that it is never justified?

Again I ask, where do we have to get that you get on board and agree that this was all necessary? If deaths are well below what was first predicted how will you reconcile with the possibility that the reason they were lower is because of the preventative actions taken?

Where is the line for you? Does it have to kill someone in your family for you to take notice or is there a body count you need to see?

Were Bill in charge, how would things be different?

BTW, the numbers are always changing so each report is going to be dependent on when the numbers are read and the sources from which they are taken which are all updated at different intervals.
I don't think anything would convince Bill otherwise. If the body count sky rocketed, he'd just say it was made up. He's already saying that actually. Doctors are inflating fatalities in order to get more money for hospitals. But, only certain hospitals not all of them apparently. Somehow doctors and nurses across the country are coordinating their efforts in order to do this. The logistics to make this happen must be a nightmare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rqa

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
Oh dude! Perhaps you should go back and better study just who was responsible for opening up trade with China. Hint: they weren’t “my side”.

Congrats! You just graduated to kook status.
Apparently it was okay in the middle of the Cold War to open up trade with a communist country but now it's not okay to do trade with them anymore because communism.
 

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
-nixon "normalized" relations w/ Communist China. We traded some mainly cheap consumables and such.....then clinton blew it *wide the **** open*. Since then folks on both sides of the isle have gotten stinking rich selling us out. Fleeced.
If you're in support of a free market without government oversight, then this is a naturally occurring situation.
 

rudd1

New member
Oct 3, 2007
14,419
21,101
0
-nope. Gross oversimplification*.

*edit to edify the ignorant:

-put simply, China is an has had the benefit of being designated a "developing" economy by the WTO and such, they dont have the same rules/restrictions as "developed" countries.

^not a result of a free market system. The playing field is not level.
 
Last edited:

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
15,086
11,447
0
But you will both right on your selective ad hoc hindsight reasoning interpretation of the facts.

I am saying, right here and now, that the data shows it's time to get back to work for the majority of the country with sufficient preventative measures, and what we already did was sufficient/necessary and will be sufficient going forward, that we will only get better at handling this and there will be no "real" catastrophe except for the incompetent mishandling of everything going forward.

Meaning, simplified...

Austria/Denmark are going back to work irrespective of continuing need for restrictions in Italy/Spain the same way Omaha should irrespective of ongoing crisis in NYC.
 

sambowieshin_rivals

New member
Nov 27, 2009
21,246
21,450
0
Bill, “we may be shutting down the country over a false storyline”...those are your words.
WTF is this “false storyline” and who and how did whoever created this storyline get practically the entire world to go along?
From day 1 people like yourself have said things like “it’s no worse than the seasonal flu”, scoffed at the numbers of deaths when it was “only” 10, 20 (3 weeks ago)... which wasn’t that long ago...now we are at 15,000, will be 20,000 by this weekend. Nine days ago we passed the 1000 deaths/day plateau, now the last two days we’ve been right at 2000/day. Think it hits 3000/day?

You’ve been wrong every step of the way yet you continue to try and find some angle to criticize actions taken. But seriously, “may”?
What if had we done nothing and the number of deaths were now 50,000-100,000 and climbing? What if we had done nothing and our ICUs across the country were having to decide who to let live and who to die because we did nothing, we waited until Bill thought there was an issue and now it is too late, it’s out of control.
What does it take, what would you have to see to get onboard and agree that we’re doing the best we can?

We don’t have a parallel universe that can serve as a control to tell us what would happen if...
My God, we have actions being taken across the globe...everybody is being conned? For whose benefit?
I concur with your well communicated rationale. Unfortunately, facts and reason mean nothing to people who dwell in an alternate world and live by illogical assumptions about the world around them. There is practically nothing you can say, do or show to convince them otherwise.
Jim Jones followers were just as sure that Jim Jones was a great leader and the government was out to get them too. The flat Earthers see pictures of the Earth from space but are undeterred. The lunar landing was a hoax to some despite all the proof that it truly happened. The Holocaust never happened even with all the death camp pictures and buildings that remain to this day.
Not sure what the psychology is behind this mindset, but I find it ironic they are almost always the same ones who will be quick to deny a scientifically proven fact but pay 40 bucks to walk thru an Ark with animatronic dinosaurs on it and argue that it is an undeniable truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rqa and SuporChin

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
But you will both right on your selective ad hoc hindsight reasoning interpretation of the facts.

I am saying, right here and now, that the data shows it's time to get back to work for the majority of the country with sufficient preventative measures, and what we already did was sufficient/necessary and will be sufficient going forward, that we will only get better at handling this and there will be no "real" catastrophe except for the incompetent mishandling of everything going forward.

What data shows it's time to go back to work? The White House has shown that the worst of this will be happening in the next week or two? Why would we go back to work, even with precautions, when nearly 2000 Americans (and growing) are dying from this everyday?
 

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
I concur with your well communicated rationale. Unfortunately, facts and reason mean nothing to people who dwell in an alternate world and live by illogical assumptions about the world around them. There is practically nothing you can say, do or show to convince them otherwise.
Jim Jones followers were just as sure that Jim Jones was a great leader and the government was out to get them too. The flat Earthers see pictures of the Earth from space but are undeterred. The lunar landing was a hoax to some despite all the proof that it truly happened. The Holocaust never happened even with all the death camp pictures and buildings that remain to this day.
Not sure what the psychology is behind this mindset, but I find it ironic they are almost always the same ones who will be quick to deny a scientifically proven fact but pay 40 bucks to walk thru an Ark with animatronic dinosaurs on it and argue that it is an undeniable truth.
I agree with all of this but to Bill we are the Earthers. He and others, make up conspiracy theories by picking up bits of data here and there to fit their world view. But we're the crazy ones for not seeing all the evidence right in front of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sambowieshin_rivals

sambowieshin_rivals

New member
Nov 27, 2009
21,246
21,450
0
I agree with all of this but to Bill we are the Earthers. He and others, make up conspiracy theories by picking up bits of data here and there to fit their world view. But we're the crazy ones for not seeing all the evidence right in front of us.
True. But the difference is that we are getting our information from scientists, the CDC and doctors who have devoted their entire lives to this particular situation.....while they glean their "alternate facts" from the likes of Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Donald Trump who know less than zero about any of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuporChin

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
15,086
11,447
0
All of the data, but I should've typed nearly time to get back to work as that is what I meant.

What is happening in the hotspots shouldn't necessitate the same measures that are necessary there be taken everywhere. the data simply isn't there to support it especially when you start to calculate the cost in life due to economic realities and potential hardships.


I agree with all of this but to Bill we are the Earthers. He and others, make up conspiracy theories by picking up bits of data here and there to fit their world view. But we're the crazy ones for not seeing all the evidence right in front of us.


I'm not making a conspiratorial or "flat earther" argument, I'm saying the data/evidence isn't there that we aren't doing more harm than good going forward, not what was already done wasn't necessary.

There are eminently qualified people who have taken the same look at the same data, have come to and still maintain the same conclusion. Science is not done by consensus nor does it side with one political party, the facts are simply the facts. Austria/Denmark are looking at the same realities essentially as we are, and they are doing based on the evidence what I believe is right and America (in general, not where there are breakouts and other factors) should go ahead and follow suit soon.
 

TheEgyptianMagician

New member
May 6, 2004
15,086
11,447
0
True. But the difference is that we are getting our information from scientists, the CDC and doctors who have devoted their entire lives to this particular situation.....while they glean their "alternate facts" from the likes of Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Donald Trump who know less than zero about any of this.

I think deferring your judgement to people you deem smarter than you is no better really.

It's no better whatsoever than deferring your judgement to a political advocate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuporChin

rqa

New member
Sep 10, 2002
3,011
1,668
0
-nixon "normalized" relations w/ Communist China. We traded some mainly cheap consumables and such.....then clinton blew it *wide the **** open*. Since then folks on both sides of the isle have gotten stinking rich selling us out. Fleeced.
Before Clinton, Reagan actually threw the door open.
1981-85 the growth of imports grew 16,1% (average annual growth).
86-90 +4.8%
91-95 +19.9%
96-00 +11.3%
01-05 +24%
06 +23.8%
07 +23.4%
08 +18.5%

Didn’t the right wing push the free trade, open door policy? Why yes they did.
And aren’t these private businesses that chose to show there, chose to set up factories there?
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
Again, we don’t have a parallel universe to compare no action vs actions taken. And frankly, we don’t know how many will end up dying. 3.5 weeks ago less than 100 had died, today 15,000 have died and the rate continues to climb. It’s hitting NYC hard right now...what if it hits Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston, Philadelphia, Miami, etc equally hard? Can you assure us it won’t?
They are building out mobile hospitals in Louisville and Lexington in anticipation of increased need.

This isn’t the first time government has “intruded” into the lives of Americans. They took even more severe intrusions during WWII not to mention the Civil War. Did you have a problem with those?
Is it your claim that it is never justified?

Again I ask, where do we have to get that you get on board and agree that this was all necessary? If deaths are well below what was first predicted how will you reconcile with the possibility that the reason they were lower is because of the preventative actions taken?

Where is the line for you? Does it have to kill someone in your family for you to take notice or is there a body count you need to see?

Were Bill in charge, how would things be different?

BTW, the numbers are always changing so each report is going to be dependent on when the numbers are read and the sources from which they are taken which are all updated at different intervals.

The CDC is the official count, and their numbers don’t match one in the media.

The fact you compare this to the Civil War and WW2 shows how ridiculous of an argument you’re posing.

The state also just made KY dam village ready, it’s insane. We are not NYC, there is more people in a 100 sq Mile radius there than there is in the entire state of KY.

Quarantine the vulnerable, and the rest of us go about our business.
 

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
Before Clinton, Reagan actually threw the door open.
1981-85 the growth of imports grew 16,1% (average annual growth).
86-90 +4.8%
91-95 +19.9%
96-00 +11.3%
01-05 +24%
06 +23.8%
07 +23.4%
08 +18.5%

Didn’t the right wing push the free trade, open door policy? Why yes they did.
And aren’t these private businesses that chose to show there, chose to set up factories there?
Looks like trade really blew up once Bush II took office. Even when Clinton was president, I've been reminded many times, that there was a Republican majority Congress.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
We were not told millions WOULD die, we were told that IF we did nothing THEN millions would die from the virus. We were also told that If we practiced social distancing, THEN we could mitigate the infection rate. Don't be making stuff to fit your narrative.

So we weren’t told millions would die? Which is why we shut everything down which is exactly what I stated. It caused people to panic.
The report from the imperial college is what scared the **** out of everyone.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
I don't think anything would convince Bill otherwise. If the body count sky rocketed, he'd just say it was made up. He's already saying that actually. Doctors are inflating fatalities in order to get more money for hospitals. But, only certain hospitals not all of them apparently. Somehow doctors and nurses across the country are coordinating their efforts in order to do this. The logistics to make this happen must be a nightmare.

I never said doctors were making up fatalities.
 

Bill Cosby

New member
May 1, 2008
29,257
74,453
0
So we weren’t told millions would die? Which is why we shut everything down which is exactly what I stated. It caused people to panic.
The report from the imperial college is what scared the **** out of everyone.


We weren’t told millions WOULD die, Bill, we were told millions would die. Big difference. Surprised you missed it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScrewDuke1

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
All of the data, but I should've typed nearly time to get back to work as that is what I meant.

What is happening in the hotspots shouldn't necessitate the same measures that are necessary there be taken everywhere. the data simply isn't there to support it especially when you start to calculate the cost in life due to economic realities and potential hardships.





I'm not making a conspiratorial or "flat earther" argument, I'm saying the data/evidence isn't there that we aren't doing more harm than good going forward, not what was already done wasn't necessary.

There are eminently qualified people who have taken the same look at the same data, have come to and still maintain the same conclusion. Science is not done by consensus nor does it side with one political party, the facts are simply the facts. Austria/Denmark are looking at the same realities essentially as we are, and they are doing based on the evidence what I believe is right and America (in general, not where there are breakouts and other factors) should go ahead and follow suit soon.
I wasn't specifically saying it was you who was making these conspiracy stories. Bill is so concerned about this and that with essentially made up stories he comes up with.

I want to open everything back up, but it's looking like the end of April at a minimum. Things are supposed to start hitting the rest of the country soon. The NY area was the first to really get it and the rest of the country is going to follow soon. There are over 300k officially active cases and still growing. I would think if we saw that the growth number itself were stabilizing or showed negative growth, then let's look at opening it up. As of right now, there's too much positive viral growth to really seriously consider it in the next few weeks.

If we open too soon, then we risk prolonging all of this and the economy would continue to tank anyways. Even if we all went back to work tomorrow, with precautions, there are too many that just wouldn't due to the fear of getting it.
What does opening the economy look like to you?
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
True. But the difference is that we are getting our information from scientists, the CDC and doctors who have devoted their entire lives to this particular situation.....while they glean their "alternate facts" from the likes of Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Donald Trump who know less than zero about any of this.

I got my info from the CDC website, news reports and the Covid task group. So come down off that high horse.
 

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
So we weren’t told millions would die? Which is why we shut everything down which is exactly what I stated. It caused people to panic.
The report from the imperial college is what scared the **** out of everyone.
We were told that millions COULD die if we did nothing at all. That's what the Trump Administration shared with the public. That's what a lot of data science has shown. If we did nothing at all to slow the spread of COVID-19, then yes, millions could die.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
I didn't say you said that. Are you so defensive that you lost you're reading comprehension?

Im not defensive at all, whether you agree with me or not makes no difference.

How much do you think NYC will get from the federal govt for this? 100 -200 billion?
 

SuporChin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,148
1,149
0
Im not defensive at all, whether you agree with me or not makes no difference.

How much do you think NYC will get from the federal govt for this? 100 -200 billion?

Let's say 100 Billion.
What do you think the city will use that money for? Line the Mayor's pockets and buy himself a boat?
Maybe.
It could also be used to deliver relief to the city that's been most affected so far. That's why some politicians wanted oversight on how the funds were being distributed and used.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
I wasn't specifically saying it was you who was making these conspiracy stories. Bill is so concerned about this and that with essentially made up stories he comes up with.

I want to open everything back up, but it's looking like the end of April at a minimum. Things are supposed to start hitting the rest of the country soon. The NY area was the first to really get it and the rest of the country is going to follow soon. There are over 300k officially active cases and still growing. I would think if we saw that the growth number itself were stabilizing or showed negative growth, then let's look at opening it up. As of right now, there's too much positive viral growth to really seriously consider it in the next few weeks.

If we open too soon, then we risk prolonging all of this and the economy would continue to tank anyways. Even if we all went back to work tomorrow, with precautions, there are too many that just wouldn't due to the fear of getting it.
What does opening the economy look like to you?

Im not making any conspiracy stories chin, Dr Birx stated we are liberal with death counts where some countries with lower counts are conservative.
We are counting deaths as Covid related if they test positive or assumed positive, that is wide open for fraud, especially when billions of federal dollars are just waiting to be spent.

You seem to think I believe this whole thing is a hoax, I don’t. However, I’m not naive enough to not realize state and locals govts, will do everything they can to get federal money.
I don’t think this level of shutdown was necessary, isolate the vulnerable and social distance. This is getting to the point it’s absurd in KY.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
Let's say 100 Billion.
What do you think the city will use that money for? Line the Mayor's pockets and buy himself a boat?
Maybe.
It could also be used to deliver relief to the city that's been most affected so far. That's why some politicians wanted oversight on how the funds were being distributed and used.

It allows the city and state to be fiscally irresponsible and have the govt bail them
out without being taken to task for their poor leadership.
 

bluthruandthru

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2009
3,814
3,928
113
What does no control measures look like?


--------


Not fortifying our medical infrastructure, not SDing.
 

rudd1

New member
Oct 3, 2007
14,419
21,101
0
-as usual, you are misrepresenting(most are simply wrong) the numbers fuzz/rq.

-first your numbers for Clinton are way under what they actually are, shocking.

-second...look at the numbers as a percentage of gdp.

-third...and most important, pay attention to the trade *deficit*...you're not gonna like what you see.

-fourth...i noted that bush/obama carried on with the clinton model as relates to chinese trade. No argument there.

-finally. Pay brady the money you owe him(actually the money was headed to a charity iirc).
 

rqa

New member
Sep 10, 2002
3,011
1,668
0
So we weren’t told millions would die? Which is why we shut everything down which is exactly what I stated. It caused people to panic.
The report from the imperial college is what scared the **** out of everyone.
I have yet to meet one person who is or has panicked. Where are these people?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuporChin

rqa

New member
Sep 10, 2002
3,011
1,668
0
I got my info from the CDC website, news reports and the Covid task group. So come down off that high horse.

Bill, I’m looking at the CDC site right now.

In bold print...”This page will be updated daily. Numbers close out at 4pm the day before reporting”

So, they are telling you that their data is always a day behind.
it says:
Total cases: 427,460
Total deaths: 14,696


If I look at WorldoMeter that updates continually as data is available it says that yesterday...per it’s disclaimer “The day is reset after midnight GMT+0”
GMT+0 is 8pm EDT.
Cases: 434,927
Deaths: 14,788

So the WorldoMeter counts are slightly bigger and that is explained because the data is pulled 4 hours later.
John Hopkins is the other widely used site. There page currently says “This page was last updated Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 08:08 PM EDT.

Adjusting for the time of the data, all the sites are reporting the same data and same counts.
 

wildcatwelder_rivals

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2006
11,218
15,369
113
I haven't read the entire thread, so apologies if some has already posted similar thoughts.

As to funeral homes, I can't speak for NY, or any other state/city, but where I work, (at a central Ky hospital), our morgue was one space from being 100 capacity last week. (Not all Covid of course, if any) I asked the person in charge what would happen if it became 100 occupied, would we ask other hospitals to assist? He replied we had the largest morgue outside of Louisville, so that was not an option. I then asked WTH was going on, and he told me that families were delaying their loved ones funerals, that it was not the doing of the funeral homes. In any event, the situation resolved itself, but when I saw this mentioned here I thought I'd chime in.

It get's you wondering, what WOULD we do? Anyway, I fully expected our hospital, or any Lexington hospital, to be over run with Covid patients but, at least thus far, that hasn't been the case, thankfully. As I'm typing this we are bringing one in within minutes; they're on their way. :(
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113


--------


Not fortifying our medical infrastructure, not SDing.

According to whom? How many deaths would SD and washing hands alone have prevented and quarantining the vulnerable?

My point is we took the most drastic measure possible, went from zero to a hundred based off of a model that has no way to verify, it’s essentially the absolute worst case scenario.

According to some on here if you question that it’s akin to denying the Holocaust, flat earth, moon landing denial.
 

Bill Derington

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2003
21,348
39,163
113
I have yet to meet one person who is or has panicked. Where are these people?
Bill, I’m looking at the CDC site right now.

In bold print...”This page will be updated daily. Numbers close out at 4pm the day before reporting”

So, they are telling you that their data is always a day behind.
it says:
Total cases: 427,460
Total deaths: 14,696


If I look at WorldoMeter that updates continually as data is available it says that yesterday...per it’s disclaimer “The day is reset after midnight GMT+0”
GMT+0 is 8pm EDT.
Cases: 434,927
Deaths: 14,788

So the WorldoMeter counts are slightly bigger and that is explained because the data is pulled 4 hours later.
John Hopkins is the other widely used site. There page currently says “This page was last updated Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 08:08 PM EDT.

Adjusting for the time of the data, all the sites are reporting the same data and same counts.

They weren’t yesterday, they had accounted for 5500 deaths which may have been what Fauci was discussing yesterday on undercounting.
It also states that if Covid is the presumed death to report as a Covid death.