Dioubate and Lowe out for UNC game

Farsight Clone

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
1,029
1,977
103
What is logical about suspending him several games later and during the UNC game when you could have suspended him for 2 cupcakes instead? Do you understand what logical means?
I never said the suspension was the ONLY reason. I said it was speculative. No one knows it. Injury is all we know. So I offered addition potential speculation based off what it could be if it truly isn't an injury. That's it. It's that simple. Not sure why you're having a fuss about it. Its fine to disagree, but to claim you know it because it's "not logical" is asinine. So drop it and move on.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
42,813
76,078
113
Injuries since Pope became coach:

(I don't count JQ, because he had surgery before he arrived at UK):

Butler
Carr
Robinson
Kriisa
Lowe
Noah
Oweh
Mo-D
Potter

I guess it's just a lot of bad luck. But Pope is paid handsomely to figure it out regardless. The injuries are obviously not his fault, but the losing is if it keeps up. We have enough to beat UNC tomorrow, with or without Mo D and Lowe, especially at Rupp.
That’s an entire team and long term injuries too.
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
38,302
59,921
113
I have a sneaky suspicion that I might be switching to Battlefield6 at the half. Too many injuries to really overcome against a top25 opponent, plus we have yet to not look flat to start the game.. and that wont work against UNC.

Hope im wrong and im celebrating at the end.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
42,813
76,078
113
This whole season is really turning into a joke real quick. Unfortunately at the end of the day Pope put this soft *** roster together. We are so far from what Ik Kentucky basketball should be. It’s gonna keep getting worse this year.
This was supposed to be a tough defensive roster? Lolz.
 

Anony Moose

Senior
Dec 2, 2025
340
512
93
I never said the suspension was the ONLY reason. I said it was speculative. No one knows it. Injury is all we know. So I offered addition potential speculation based off what it could be if it truly isn't an injury. That's it. It's that simple. Not sure why you're having a fuss about it. Its fine to disagree, but to claim you know it because it's "not logical" is asinine. So drop it and move on.
But it's not logical. It would be completely illogical to suspend a player for behavior that occurred 3 or 4 games ago. Particularly when you could have suspended him either of the last 2 games against cupcakes. There would be no logical in suspending against the better opponents when your team is 0 - 2 against good opponents.