Divorce case with the Blue family settled??

UK Cats Rock

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
5,456
3,318
103
This is not correct. Kentucky is a "no fault" state regarding the grounds for the divorce, i.e., the petitioner alleges the marriage is irretrievably broken but the facts and circumstances leading to that conclusion are irrelevant. Regarding the amount of spousal maintenance, however, fault (adultery but also other elements like abuse, abandonment and fraud) can be considered along with many other factors. See Chapman v. Chapman, 498 S.W.2d 134 (Ky. 1973).

Absolutely correct.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
Why would either party contribute to the Blue's divorce settlement? That's not even a reach. That's just plain stupid.

If you can't answer your own question then you aren't thinking, the sooner this is out of the headlines the better for both these parties. Of course with your agenda I am sure facts aren't going to influence your post, unless it makes you publish BS posts like that one.