Do you think the U.S. could take over the world?

Robcatt24

Heisman
Sep 17, 2005
18,114
17,324
113
If all of America's citizens and leadership were 100% on board, could the Good Ole USA rule the Earth?

























 

akers65

All-American
Jan 23, 2008
5,993
5,523
0
Between 1945-1950 yes
Today no, too many nukes, there would be nothing left to rule
 

funKYcat75

Heisman
Apr 10, 2008
32,416
41,022
112
Could've given it a good run in the early 90s, but might've got blowed up for trying by some rogue commies that still had the codes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat

KentuckyStout

Heisman
Sep 13, 2009
10,528
19,740
65
The U.S. is too fragmented by special interest groups.

It's going to crumble like a sandcastle with each grain representing another group lobbying for their own agenda.
 

MdWIldcat55

Heisman
Dec 9, 2007
21,036
83,180
113
The first part (could America conquer the world) would be much easier than the second part (if all the citizens of the USA were on board.)

If the attack on Pearl Harbor happened today, about ten percent of the citizenry would protest that the US Pacific Fleet wanted to use too much fossil fuel to counter-attack, there'd be a lot of debate about whether it was really a war over the oil in the Dutch East Indies, for many there'd be concerns that Privileged White Males were using the attack as an excuse to further the oppression of the Asian race, there'd be editorials about how the American presence in Hawaii was an immoral expression of imperialism in the first place, and Doolittle's Raid would have to be postponed for six months or so until a female pilot could be taught to take off from the USS Hornet.
 

argubs2

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2007
3,579
4,523
0
That picture of Teddy is very false.

No way in hell he would have needed a gun to kill that samsquantch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKGrad93

Pope John Wall II

All-Conference
May 22, 2010
4,821
2,561
0
Nuclear war amongst 1st-world powers would quickly make Earth into a Fallout setting. Better build those vaults, lads.
 

starchief

Heisman
Feb 18, 2005
10,137
43,981
0
The first part (could America conquer the world) would be much easier than the second part (if all the citizens of the USA were on board.)

If the attack on Pearl Harbor happened today, about ten percent of the citizenry would protest that the US Pacific Fleet wanted to use too much fossil fuel to counter-attack, there'd be a lot of debate about whether it was really a war over the oil in the Dutch East Indies, for many there'd be concerns that Privileged White Males were using the attack as an excuse to further the oppression of the Asian race, there'd be editorials about how the American presence in Hawaii was an immoral expression of imperialism in the first place, and Doolittle's Raid would have to be postponed for six months or so until a female pilot could be taught to take off from the USS Hornet.

And, should Bru ... uh, Caitlyn Jenner be allowed to serve in a combat unit.
 

buster3.0

All-Conference
Aug 10, 2009
5,142
1,694
113
Why would the U.S. want to take over the world? There just aren't enough troops to serve as an occupying force all over the globe. Plus, there would be endless numbers of insurgents and rebellions to deal with. A state of constant war. Kind of like what the U.S. has been doing the last 13 years except at 100 times the scale.