you are a dude that spends a LOT of time thinking about other dudes' junk. The rest of your post SCREAMS that you have reached that stage of homosexuality when you URGENTLY desire for other dudes to think about yours. This is your unique adaptation to the natural process homosexuals exhibit, when they begin to compensate due to confusion, soon followed by severe emotional trauma, during that period when normal people would be entering their peak engaging in natural sexual acts associated with human reproduction. no charge
Do you touch your pee pee when you wee wee? (Serious)
- Thread starter It'saDoneDeal
- Start date
I mean, firefighters don't just let the fire hose fly around, right? They have to hold something that big for control.
That's kind of what I'm dealing with.. I'd say only a bit smaller, hard to tell. A real two-hander sort of job, you feel me??
I wish I had a tiny penis like the rest of you so I didn't have to hold it. You know, the grass isn't always greener for us..
That's kind of what I'm dealing with.. I'd say only a bit smaller, hard to tell. A real two-hander sort of job, you feel me??
I wish I had a tiny penis like the rest of you so I didn't have to hold it. You know, the grass isn't always greener for us..
I like to make sure it is still there with all of the white male emasculation going on these days. It's reassuring.[thumb2]
I definitely aim.
I like writing words, knocking off **** stuck to the side of the toilet bowl, etc.
I like writing words, knocking off **** stuck to the side of the toilet bowl, etc.
Wall get your **** together and respond to the latest naughty teacher ... effing slacker
Probably. And homosexuals should be supported in their belief that it is not an unnatural thing. Take heterosexuality. Why is it natural? Because the human species needs a process for reproducing. Nature assigns humans with reproductive instincts.
Conversely, homosexuality is simply nature's way of deselecting from the species. Undesired for reproduction. Providing them with the alternative for natural urges. Pair with deselected others. Natural process.
So basically nature hates the gays and is trying to kill them off so they can't pass that trait on to others? Nature didn't account for bisexuals or in vitro fertilization. So the gene/trait (whatever it is that makes people choose sexual orientation) still gets passed down.
No, I think what we are required to accept is that nature had deselected these individuals due to any number of undesirable conditions, many or all of which, like sexuality, may also be behavioral traits, or just too many undesired combinations of them, unfit to chance through the process of human reproduction.
What other natural reason is there for homosexuality? If as a form of sexuality it truly is "natural" then like all things in nature, and certainly like the opposing form of sexuality, transexuality, it must have a reason for occuring naturally, and a purpose. What is that purpose?
A tip learned from waiters. Keep a string tied to it. When you have to go simply pull it out with the string. Easy to aim, don't have to touch it and thus no need to wash hands afterward. Thank me later.
You appear to be attempting to use the natural selection process against an entire species to dilute the significance / uniqueness of a natural behavior trait, one specifically intended to prevent particular samples within that species from reproducing, and is very likely a form of natural selection intended to promote that species' survival.
Yeah, but I’d need at least 8 strings. I’d be out trying to rush around and serve tables on half-app night and looking all like:
I know a fella that played straight and had his wife pump out a couple of kids, then unleashed his gayness when he was about 50. Guess he played the system.
(If you saw his wife, you’d’ve gone gay too).
(If you saw his wife, you’d’ve gone gay too).
I was eating in a restaurant once and dropped my spoon. Instantly my waiter reached into his back pocket and pulled out a spoon to replace it. I thanked him and asked him how he happened to have a spoon in his pocket. He said it was a trick he had learned to save time. He said that when he went to the bathroom he just unzipped his pants and used his spoon to dig it out and put it back and that way he didn't have to wash his hands.
Maybe this didn't really happen but it illustrates a point.
Maybe this didn't really happen but it illustrates a point.
That, or you clearly understand it yet don't like it, and for that reason are employing a timeless technique taught by boy's clubs: to pretend not to understand the meaning in hope that others will believe the message has no quality, is ineffective.
Thanks for giving me credit but I have no idea what your previous post means and I’ve read it 5 times. I find it better to use simple words and basic sentences to communicate with people 99% of the time, you’ve already convinced me you’re very smart.
Not trying to convince of anything. "I find" that simple words have a high probability of offending. But I'll give it a shot: The reason people are gay, is that they have other characteristics that do not need to be repeated. Nature has taken away their desire to participate in natural sexual reproduction. Nature does not want them to make babies. They are stuck with the default option to manage their urges, and naturally seek others like them.
Well that’s an interesting one, don’t know if I’ve heard that before. So homosexuals, people that are sterile, guys with ED, women that have uterus issues, etc have other issues and the body responds by making it so they don’t reproduce. I mean I guess that’s not really a terrible theory. Guess the only argument against it is that homosexuals actually can physiologically reproduce a lot of times, so your theory would be more hard set with couples that can’t have kids, young women with endometriosis, etc. and youre right that probably would offend those people but I see your point. Obviously nothing that can ever be studied.
You can do better than that. If homosexuality is natural then what is it's purpose? Transexual behavior is natural and has the purpose of human reproduction. What is the purpose of homosexual behavior?
No. Sterility, ED . . . those are chronic conditions, developed over time, make no distinction on the basis of sexual behavior/preference. This discussion is about the modern theory we are made to accept of how people are "naturally" assigned gay or straight. Keep in mind, vast majority of gays refuse to accept their preference is the result of conditioning.
Therefore if it is natural, it must be in opposition to the "purpose" of transexual behavior, which is to continue the species through human reproduction.
That, or it is a "natural flaw".
Honestly, I can’t. I can’t do a better job of posting something so insanely irrational.
I’m not a homosexual; happily married to a member of the opposite sex for 20+ years. Of the time we spend together doing life, the act of sex amounts to quite a small (pre-emptive ‘that’s what she said) amount of time. The rest of the time is spent not doing that one thing that everyone gets really hung up on. You shouldn’t be so hung up on how or why anyone else is doing anything. Maybe things just happen because they happen.
I'm not "hung up" . . . it is entirely rational to expect that something which exist naturally has a purpose. major fail on your part
Also, it is one thing to develop a condition in mid or late life when nature says "reproduction is over". A very different thing to have a behavior assignment at the beginning when nature says "we never want you to reproduce".
Your approval of my posts is neither desired nor important. I am 100% sure ‘nature’ is not making people gay so that they won’t pass along the bad parts of their genetic makeup.
So you’re saying that being gay is a result of conditioning (which I’m not sure what that means tbh) or it’s part of nature but a flaw of nature? We are a species that has reproduced to a ridiculous extent with no predators that has gone unchecked for centuries, all the while eating and living in conditions that have been unnatural for centuries. Homosexuals make up like 2% of our insane poopulation. Natural selection has ceased to exist for thousands of years at this point (I have awful vision and if I was born before glasses were invented I would’ve been eaten by a bear before I turned 15 frankly). So ya I think it’s pretty obvious homosexuality would fall into the ridiculous amount of natural flaws we have in our bloated society. I think your conclusion is fairly obvious tbh
Okay. Please understand, this is a discussion about nature. Not a condemnation of behavior. I used simple words at Ron's behest, disclaimed the risk of offense.
Did not intend to solicit from you your personal story but I'm sure you have a wonderful marriage, family and a beautiful, excellent wife.
I remain valid with the question, however. If homosexuality is natural, what is it's purpose?
And just to your point about sterility etc being chronic conditions I would have to disagree. My wife has a good friend (really nice, successful couple) that have had no luck having kids after years of trying. She got checked and has a condition with her uterus that doesn’t allow her to have kids without a surgery. This is a defect that she was born with (along with thousands of other people in the US every year) that 100 years ago would’ve prevented her from ever having kids. But now she can have the corrective surgery, along with others, and they can now pass this “defective gene”. These types of things have been happening for centuries due to medicine and our advancements of it.
In your theory that means she has other issues and nature’s response was to cause her uterus to not develop properly. And you have to include 100s of other examples just like this, as all of these types of conditions are unnatural - or “natural flaws”. If you’re truly trying to be objective and scientific about it you have to treat all those conditions like homosexuality - otherwise your not being intellectually honest and are being biased towards one specific example with the same result - in this case being gay.
In your theory that means she has other issues and nature’s response was to cause her uterus to not develop properly. And you have to include 100s of other examples just like this, as all of these types of conditions are unnatural - or “natural flaws”. If you’re truly trying to be objective and scientific about it you have to treat all those conditions like homosexuality - otherwise your not being intellectually honest and are being biased towards one specific example with the same result - in this case being gay.
Does everything that occurs on earth have to have a purpose? One might say that the purpose for human beings, when it come to reproductive compatibility, has way more to do with companionship than it does reproduction. That’s what makes humans different from the rest of the animal kingdom.
I figure it was a means of sexual gratification and intimacy for those born with a pre-disposition to be attracted to the same sex.
but I guess that’s none of my business
Interesting. Then the purpose of transexuality is nothing more than to achieve similar gratification and human reproduction is simply an incidental occurrence?
Everything that occurs naturally has a reason for occuring. Limiting the scope to human behavior, our natural instincts, yes, have purpose.
Agree that sterility can be other than chronic condition. Obviously can be result of birth defect. The mentally retarded. You could use that group. List goes on and on. Those conditions are not in direct opposition to transexuality. Homosexuality is. Sterility is in direct opposition fertility. I'm not promoting a discussion about fertility vs. sterility. If you would like to introduce a contrast those two, please do. I doubt you will cover any areas not already supported by modern science.