OK, so you have no "opinion" on what agenda item moves Biden across the victory line?
Higher taxes, open borders (amnesty), end oil fracking...what?
Does @atlkbv
- Thread starter Bucktown Brown
- Start date
OK, so you have no "opinion" on what agenda item moves Biden across the victory line?
Higher taxes, open borders (amnesty), end oil fracking...what?
It just amazes me how you folks on the Left just blurt things out and can't substantiate one word of it. Teach me how to do that.
"Michigan and Wisconsin are Biden's"
OK...can you explain why?
Higher taxes, open borders (amnesty), end oil fracking...what?
[/QUOTE]
No opinion I feel like typing. Biden is a terrible candidate. Trump’s in a dog fight with him. It speaks for itself.
[/QUOTE]
No opinion I feel like typing. Biden is a terrible candidate. Trump’s in a dog fight with him. It speaks for itself.
Let me put it to you this way @Bucktown Brown, I'm just as convinced Trump will win as you are unable to tell me why Biden won't lose.
If that doesn't make sense, I can't help you anymore. Give me a reason why Biden wins, and maybe I can think of a scenario where Trump loses. They both can't win...one will win and the other will lose correct?
So, you can't tell me why Biden wins, therefore I don't have a reason for you to explain why Trump loses!
Get it?
If that doesn't make sense, I can't help you anymore. Give me a reason why Biden wins, and maybe I can think of a scenario where Trump loses. They both can't win...one will win and the other will lose correct?
So, you can't tell me why Biden wins, therefore I don't have a reason for you to explain why Trump loses!
Get it?
No opinion I feel like typing. Biden is a terrible candidate. Trump’s in a dog fight with him. It speaks for itself.
[/QUOTE]
He beat the other worse candidates.
Uhhhh...because he's leading in the polls in MI and WI and all the vote left to count is urban/suburban mail in votes, which heavily favor him.It just amazes me how you folks on the Left just blurt things out and can't substantiate one word of it. Teach me how to do that.
"Michigan and Wisconsin are Biden's"
OK...can you explain why?
Uh they're not "polling" anyone, they're counting votes and they're not all for Biden. MI and WI haven't been called yet and it's no guarantee Biden wins both or either.
No one said guarantee. But he's already up and if you don't understand that outstanding vote is mostly urban and mail in and that vote heavily favors Biden...then you aren't paying attention.
Back to the point, why is Biden going to win? He's going to get more votes. That's the only reason that matters.
Well you're calling a total number of votes that all haven't been counted yet. Don't do that. Count the votes of the winner. They're still counting.
Arguing with yourself (in the same thread no less)
Don't do that, you'll get mad at yourself or confuse yourself over your own arguments.
Gosh.
You understand the difference between what one thinks is going to happen and a guarantee right? Doesn't sound like you do.Arguing with yourself (in the same thread no less)
Don't do that, you'll get mad at yourself or confuse yourself over your own arguments.
Gosh.
You understand the difference between saying something's going to happen that actually hasn't happened yet right? Doesn't sound like you do.
You'd better be careful. Predicting events that haven't happened and then arguing them as fate accompli leads to Joe Biden style dementia.
Don't do that...he's hard enough to follow.
Hell No! He should double down. That train away from the Democrat poverty plantation has already left the station. Full speed ahead.
re-enslaving people is an unthinkable moral aberrancy. Harriet Tubman couldn't convince blacks to join the railroad and those refusing freedom perished in bondage. Those blacks now and future generations turning their backs on freedom again are destined to live the effects of enslaving leftist policies.
He suggests events occurring that haven't happened and then argues against himself that he didn't suggest what he's arguing for?
Loco.
He asks for a reason. I give him a reason. And then he deflects to some irrelevant argument about the word guarantee, which apparently he doesn't understand.
Don't care. Had sex.
You deny your own words, I'll just quote them
So you apparently either don't recognize or understand or your own words, or you're confused over the difference between saying something's going to happen and actually believing it?
Don't bother explaining it to me, try and explain it to yourself because you're the one who's confused...not me.
You said I made a guarantee you dolt. I did not. I never once said guarantee. You said that word...not me. So, you can argue the meaning of guarantee all you want. Its irrelevant.
You asked why Biden was going to win Wisconsin and Michigan. I said because he was going to get more votes. The point was it doesn't matter what the issues are if he wins. By all accounts he leads in both states and all the remaining vote is going to be urban/mail in votes. Feel free to argue those votes aren't going to lean heavily toward Biden.
You accused me of lacking reading comprehension? Do yourself a favor and go back through this thread and quote back to me exactly where I said YOU made a "guarantee"? First of all, I wasn't speaking directly to you when I suggested it's no guarantee Biden will win the outstanding votes yet to be counted. YOU chimed in after the fact with your own suggestion of not making a guarantee when I didn't say you said any such thing! I simply stated as a general FACT there is no guarantee Biden will get all the votes yet to be counted. I didn't accuse YOU of saying that, I simply made a general statement of FACT.
Then you doubled down trying to suggest that because he's ahead, he's "going to win the most votes", and I simply pointed out that it's best to wait until all the votes are counted before making that prediction.
So again, I invite you to quote me verbatim where I accused YOU of making a "guarantee" that Biden was going to win? I've already explained exactly what I said, and the proof of my accuracy is in this thread for you to read or quote back to me if you just scroll up a few posts. Post for me what you claim I said, or admit you're a liar and also illiterate accusing someone else of who you are and what YOU did.
(that's typical for a Leftist by the way...I'll bet you'd even deny you're one of them don't ya?)
You are consistent if nothing else.
Last edited:
You replied directly to me when you said, "MI and WI haven't been called yet and it's no guarantee Biden wins both or either.". You argue about quoting me or not, but when you reply directly to someone saying there is no guarantee of something happens it implies they said it was.
Feel free to reply over and over again regarding some stupid argument you want to have. I'll sit back and enjoy when Trump loses MI and WI along with the entire election.
Edit: He actually just won WI.
Well, he won MN, AZ and WI. And he's leading NV w/ Las Vegas w/ the largest # of outstanding votes. You want to guess who wins Las Vegas and therefore NV? And he's up in MI w/ Detroit w/ the largest # of outstanding votes. You want to guess who wins Detroit and therefore MI?
I'm well aware that nothing is done until its done, but I never guaranteed anything. Although, I did say Biden was going to win the votes in those states based on the outstanding vote counts. I wasn't going out on a limb. Everyone else, except you apparently, have come to the same conclusion.
Were the number of votes counted from parts of Michigan or just Wisconsin? Because the Trump administration is requesting a recount since more votes were counted than there are registered voters! You won't answer me, but can you explain that to yourself?
Hey NYCeer...I wasn't even talking to you when you claimed Biden would win "because he's going to get the most votes". I was asking @Bucktown Brown how he was sure Biden had won those two States? YOU offered a solution that had not even happened, and all I said was there is no guarantee Biden would get all of those votes.
That remains true because more votes were counted than there are registered voters, so that's going to a recount because the margin of "victory" is less than 1%. In Michigan, they suddenly "found" 100,000 votes and guess what?
They were ALL Biden votes! Imagine that?
All I asked you to do was to quote me where I said YOU made a "guarantee"? Since you cannot, let the record show I didn't say that and you're a damn illiterate liar.
Last edited:
There's some shady **** going on atl. The dems, big tech, and the media including Fox News are all in on it.
Of course they are....Trump was on his way to winning this thing going away and they suddenly stopped counting.
Wonder why?
*Edit Arizona was removed as a Biden "win". Wisconsin will be challenged because more votes were cast than there are registered voters.
What you don't understand is that the overwhelming majority of the remaining vote will be for Biden. He's up 3-4% w/ 86% reporting. Most of the remaining vote to be counted is in Maricopa County/Phoenix. Again...urban vote and mostly mail in ballots. Care to make a guess as to who wins that remaining vote?
Fake News: starting to really look like sour grapes.