wishful thinking by folks totally lacking such skills and envious of those who have succeeded in the employment of them. Moronic Dem talking points.
The writer critiques Trump's negotiating tactics since he's been in office so there's no wishful thinking, it's already happened. I wouldn't call any of it talking points. The BS he used to try in the private sector doesn't translate well to his new job.wishful thinking by folks totally lacking such skills and envious of those who have succeeded in the employment of them. Moronic Dem talking points.
The writer critiques Trump's negotiating tactics since he's been in office so there's no wishful thinking, it's already happened. I wouldn't call any of it talking points. The BS he used to try in the private sector doesn't translate well to his new job.
True.I agree with a lot of it, but, Ryan has had his hand in it quite a lot as well. It was his decision to run with healthcare behind all closed doors without bringing in those he expected to vote for it.
True.
The idiot invited the President of the Philippines to the WH.
Plus Trump has a new tower going up in the Philippines. Just good business from our swamp drainer in chief.Ever heard of North Korea, moron? You need to understand strategic thinking, which I know is impossible for you.
Business goes on. Was the tower in the works before the election? Do you think Kerry suspended all roll outs of planned Heinz products while he was doing the countries business?Plus Trump has a new tower going up in the Philippines. Just good business from our swamp drainer in chief.
I believe the Kerry's owned 2-3% of Heinz and divested before he took over, but I thought this administration would be draining the swamp? lolBusiness goes on. Was the tower in the works before the election? Do you think Kerry suspended all roll outs of planned Heinz products while he was doing the countries business?
I believe the Kerry's owned 2-3% of Heinz and divested before he took over, but I thought this administration would be draining the swamp? lol
Maybe she owned more when she was married to the Heinz family, but not in years.His wife owned far more.
AP Published 1:47 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2013 | Updated 3:48 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2013I believe the Kerry's owned 2-3% of Heinz and divested before he took over, but I thought this administration would be draining the swamp? lol
Maybe she owned more when she was married to the Heinz family, but not in years.
Heinz Kerry, heir to the Heinz fortune (and wife of Secretary of State John Kerry), won’t personally profit from the merger, according to a Heinz spokesman and analysts who spoke with Boston.com. Heinz Kerry cashed out her company stock when Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital acquired Heinz in 2013, Heinz said.
At the time of the sale, Heinz Kerry reportedly held less than a 1 percent stake in the company, an even smaller figure than the 4 percent reported by the Heinz company during John Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign.
![]()
2010. Before he was SOS, no?AP Published 1:47 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2013 | Updated 3:48 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2013
WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State John Kerry's financial portfolio could grow by hundreds of thousands of dollars from Thursday's $23 billion deal between billionaire Warren Buffett and a Brazilian-owned investment firm to buy out ketchup producer H.J. Heinz Co. 2010 financial disclosure forms show at least $3 million in Heinz stock in family trusts.Kerry said he would recuse himself from decisions involving the Heinz company when appropriate.
2010. Before he was SOS, no?
2010. Before he was SOS, no?
Sorry. Read it wrong. It said he could grow...did it? And again, they owned 1-2% of Heinz.
Try what again? Dispute what I posted.
lol. Coming from the ones making excuses for the Trumps. Drain that swamp!! Drain that swamp!!1 - 2% is a huge number for a company the size of Heinz. Keep making excuses.
Agreed.You posted your sorry sentence well after you. posted the first sentence.
1 - 2% is a huge number for a company the size of Heinz. Keep making excuses.
lol. Coming from the ones making excuses for the Trumps. Drain that swamp!! Drain that swamp!!
[laughing] You really have no clue what an idiot you are.
You sure are running away from your comment that she owned MUCH more then a few % of stock. lol. Keep moving those goal posts. Eventually the plebes will see the Trumps for what they are.So 1 - 2% of Heniz is small? You are really, really dumb.
But Obama shouldn't make money after serving the nation for 8 years? Ridiculous. I was more upset about the money he made for his campaign to beat McCain and Romney than I am about the money one makes after leaving office.Trump is a businessman. The first in a long, long time. He naturally has business interests from which he has divorced himself. That is all that you can ask since asking him to sell all his assets is ridiculous. He is rich enough he doesn't have to make $400K speeches or sign $20M book deals like Obama. And Obama railed against making too much money and now look at him. Suddenly he is a capitalist.
He's got jukesYou sure are running away from your comment that she owned MUCH more then a few % of stock. lol. Keep moving those goal posts. Eventually the plebes will see the Trumps for what they are.
You sure are running away from your comment that she owned MUCH more then a few % of stock. lol. Keep moving those goal posts. Eventually the plebes will see the Trumps for what they are.
But Obama shouldn't make money after serving the nation for 8 years? Ridiculous. I was more upset about the money he made for his campaign to beat McCain and Romney than I am about the money one makes after leaving office.
Trump wants to be the sacrificing President of the people, ok. I think that's great. But why Mar a Lago? Why do things that requires the Federal government to pay his businesses? I wouldn't want him to sell his assets off, but I think it's legitimate to ask him to not conduct business in the Oval in a way that enhances those assets directly and substantially. That's not a legitimate request?
It was accurate. He's also no longer in a position of influence, so I don't know why Trumpers have to bring him up. Stand behind your fleecer.You said he divested before he took over as SOS. Was that accurate? Eventually you Trump haters will run out of steam as we get our tax cuts, our repatriation of overseas profits, our military build-up and more conservative SCOTUS picks.
It was accurate. He's also no longer in a position of influence, so I don't know why Trumpers have to bring him up. Stand behind your fleecer.
I see the word could again. He divested his interests in order to avoid conflicts of interest. OGE approved of his plans. And all of that still has nothing to do with the Trumps.It was highly inaccurate. So, you're right and the A/P is wrong? He was SOS in 2013, right?
AP Published 1:47 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2013 | Updated 3:48 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2013
WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State John Kerry's financial portfolio could grow by hundreds of thousands of dollars from Thursday's $23 billion deal between billionaire Warren Buffett and a Brazilian-owned investment firm to buy out ketchup producer H.J. Heinz Co. 2010 financial disclosure forms show at least $3 million in Heinz stock in family trusts.Kerry said he would recuse himself from decisions involving the Heinz company when appropriate.
I see the word could again. He divested his interests in order to avoid conflicts of interest. OGE approved of his plans. And all of that still has nothing to do with the Trumps.
![]()
It is true. His divest plan satisfied the OGE. More than can be said about the Trumps.You're the one dodging. You said Kerry divested before he became SOS. Not true. Are you right or is the A/P right? Two left wing entities, who to trust? That is a tough one.
It is true. His divest plan satisfied the OGE. More than can be said about the Trumps.