Drawbacks to Trumps trade plans

[DvlDog4WVU]

Tell me why what Trump alleges regarding trade deficits are incorrect.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

Tell me why what Trump alleges regarding trade deficits are incorrect.

What does he allege?

 

[Popeer]

Apparently just about everything he's said about trade deficits is incorrect. And nobody can accuse the National Review of being some socialist rag.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429510/trade-deficit-united-states-china-donald-trump

 

[bamaEER]

Apparently just about everything he's said about trade deficits is incorrect. And nobody can accuse the National Review of being some socialist rag.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429510/trade-deficit-united-states-china-donald-trump

This is a very good read, thanks.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Apparently just about everything he's said about trade deficits is incorrect. And nobody can accuse the National Review of being some socialist rag.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429510/trade-deficit-united-states-china-donald-trump

Good read. Thanks.

 

[WhiteTailEER]

Apparently just about everything he's said about trade deficits is incorrect. And nobody can accuse the National Review of being some socialist rag.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429510/trade-deficit-united-states-china-donald-trump

We need a lot more of this on this board.

 

[mneilmont]

Yes, that is a hell of an improvement in our fiscal position. Who are those idiots that keep putting the reports out to crucify Obama's economic actions? Yes, that is great news - if true.

 

[op2]

The National Reivew is a bunch of losers. They lost to Mother Jones for best magazine in 2012. It's founder, William F. Buckley, is dead. I like magazines whose founders don't die. National Reiview is short and it lies a lot. All the letters it uses have been used by other magazines before. It steal letters! It's too dumb and unoriginal to come up with letters of its own. Rosie O'Donnell probably reads the National Review.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

If you are going to do an article criticizing someone, keep the criticism to the facts and don't use words like "ilk" and hurl slanderous insults and compare someone to a Kardashian, etc. Trump does that himself. The article is in poor taste.

 

[Popeer]

If you are going to do an article criticizing someone, keep the criticism to the facts and don't use words like "ilk" and hurl slanderous insults and compare someone to a Kardashian, etc. Trump does that himself. The article is in poor taste.

Seriously, that's the best you can come up with? Focusing on the style instead of the substance?

 

[Popeer]

The National Reivew is a bunch of losers. They lost to Mother Jones for best magazine in 2012. It's founder, William F. Buckley, is dead. I like magazines whose founders don't die. National Reiview is short and it lies a lot. All the letters it uses have been used by other magazines before. It steal letters! It's too dumb and unoriginal to come up with letters of its own. Rosie O'Donnell probably reads the National Review.

[laughing][roll][laughing]

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Seriously, that's the best you can come up with? Focusing on the style instead of the substance?

Cut him some slack, he's simple.

 

[dave]

Apparently just about everything he's said about trade deficits is incorrect. And nobody can accuse the National Review of being some socialist rag.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429510/trade-deficit-united-states-china-donald-trump

The article seems like a lot of common sense.

My only thought about trump and his claims is that I dont think he is serious about much of it if any of it. He wants to get a deal but his clains are alwas the most favorable to his side of the deal and why he seems so ridiculous.

 

[mneilmont]

This is a very good read, thanks.

Kevin Williamson deserves some critical research before you accept his work.