According to ESPN, Malauch only had 3 fouls for the game. Fox2Monk, I’m not trying to call you out. You’re one of my favorite posters and entitled to your opinion. I just think you’re elevating Malauch to a pedestal on which he didn’t belong. And in the process you’re unfairly (although unintentionally, I’m sure) discrediting UK’s win?
Maybe UK did benefit from Malauch being off the floor for a few minutes at that point in the game. On the other hand, who’s to say he wouldn’t have had a couple of turnovers, key miscues or simply reverted to his norm in that time? That was the best game by far that Malauch played over the next month. And, again, he was already playing more minutes than he was used to, which may well be why he had cramps. I mean a person could just as well argue that Duke was lucky that Malauch was playing above his norm.
Players go in and out every game for various reasons, including scheme, fatigue, etc. Malauch played plenty of minutes – again more minutes than he usually played. In fact, Malauch usually played less minutes and only played one or two more minutes a handful of times the rest of the season. So, if he was so dominant and such a world beater that UK couldn’t compete why wasn’t that enough? Why couldn’t Malauch compel Duke to a win when he played unencumbered during the key final minutes and couldn’t stop Carr. My point is there’s a ton of factors contributing to the result in any game. UK beat Duke straight up and no excuse exists to take away from that.