I think he’s mostly right to be honest. To be fair, K definitely sat Carey multiple times last year though when matchups didn’t favor him playing. at VT comes to mind right away.
Bagley and Wendell were two sure fire top 5-10 picks from the second they stepped on campus so comparing them isn’t fair, but Mo’s point is correct- our guys currently aren’t anywhere near that level as Wendell and MB3. We all knew that coming in.
So, for me, it’s, matchup yesterday dictated that those guys wouldn’t play much. We will get a better sense Tuesday night against MSU.
I hear you tim but making the blanket statement (the one i initially responded to), unless our bigs are Bagley good this year, then if our opponent goes small, we have to as well... I just absolutely disagree.
What does that even mean (being Bagley-good? Offensively? Both ends?) What if one of our bigs isn't as offensively skilled but has excellent lateral quickness and is really solid as a pick and roll defender? Or has some other type of superior defensive skill? Or if we play one or two of our bigs and play some zone?
And please, no one tell me they lack such skills based off of practice. Hurt, Roach and Moore supposedly had been our best players in practice... how did that translate?
I just strongly disagree that in certain circumstances we MUST let our opponent dictate our personnel. Possibly, but we have not seen nearly enough from our bigs to give a faultless assessment of their strengths and weaknesses. And what about making them adjust to us? In our case that could mean a number of different lineups.
Regardless, you're right... we'll learn a lot more against Michigan State.