If Duke being blown out in a regular season game at home against Miami makes you feel better about Kentucky losing a close game to Wisconsin in the FF, have at it man. We'll take the championship with that loss.
Of course we would rather have the trophy. We'd swap seasons in a second.
But that is to say that we'd rather have the second or third best team in the country, but who happens to win the championship, rather than the best team in the country, which happens to fall short.
Some of your philosophically challenged brethren believe these categorizations to be mutually exclusive, leading to hilarious conclusions like that UCONN in '14 or UK in '98 were the best teams in the country those years.
For people who don't understand probability and the implications of a single elimination 64 team format for drawing rigorous statistical conclusions about various teams, this will always be a hang up point - "the best team wins the tournament by definition". These people are idiots.
But the majority who disagree with our contentions do so out of convenience - "Every year
my team won it, my team was the best. But nonetheless, it is *possible* for a team which is not the best to win it, and I can name
other teams who weren't the best when they won." For a team with as many championships as UK or Duke, this is silly and disingenuous.