Durham's getting close

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
I'm with you. Thrilled if it happens, highly doubtful if any of 'em ever see a courtroom much less a jail cell.
There are going to be several indictments. It wont be Obama but everyone else is fair game. Durham took down the Irish mob. The Kenyan mafia wont survive.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,296
113
There are going to be several indictments. It wont be Obama but everyone else is fair game. Durham took down the Irish mob. The Kenyan mafia wont survive.

From your keyboard to Almighty God's ears Dave my Man. Sure hope you're right. Indictments right around mid-to-late October would send the Left into hyperventilation over Trump's "October surprise".
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
From your keyboard to Almighty God's ears Dave my Man. Sure hope you're right. Indictments right around mid-to-late October would send the Left into hyperventilation over Trump's "October surprise".
More like July/August if not sooner.

They have Durham working specifically on Crossfire Hurricane and Jensen is working on abuses by the Mueller team.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,296
113
More like July/August if not sooner.

They have Durham working specifically on Crossfire Hurricane and Jensen is working on abuses by the Mueller team.

That would be even better because then the Left couldn't claim it's a "diversion" designed to get Trump re-elected. My hope is the indictments all point to one central figure who orchestrated the entire scam...

This Dude....

atl, do I look like the kind of guy who'd be that underhanded?

Do you really want me to answer that honestly Zero?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
That would be even better because then the Left couldn't claim it's a "diversion" designed to get Trump re-elected. My hope is the indictments all point to one central figure who orchestrated the entire scam...

This Dude....

atl, do I look like the kind of guy who'd be that underhanded?

Do you really want me to answer that honestly Zero?
They cant claim a diversion with a straight face anyway. It will be FBI/DOJ, intel people and journalists being indicted. Not the campaign.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,296
113
They cant claim a diversion with a straight face anyway. It will be FBI/DOJ, intel people and journalists being indicted. Not the campaign.

If Durham goes after Journalists Dave, then I will have seen everything. Why are you so confident? Talk me out of my skepticism, especially for propaganda peddling reporters? o_O
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
If Durham goes after Journalists Dave, then I will have seen everything. Why are you so confident? Talk me out of my skepticism, especially for propaganda peddling reporters? o_O
Because journalists were involved in leaking classified material and thia isnt just someone leaking classified stuff to them and them not knowing. They had a system to get and leak classified material.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,296
113
Because journalists were involved in leaking classified material and thia isnt just someone leaking classified stuff to them and them not knowing. They had a system to get and leak classified material.

I don't know Dave. I've never known media to be "arrested" or "charged" for leaking. If Durham indicts someone in the media for passing along classified information, that's a different matter but he'd better be sure who did so or it could spark a nasty Constitutional fight over free speech or freedom of the Press. We don't need that battle right now as much as we need convictions of those in Government at least who actually broke the Law.

Hope you're right, but as I said I have my doubts. Look at Hillary? Her lyin' illegal *** STILL hasn't been charged yet!
 

WVU80ate_rivals

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2003
4,243
0
0
I don't know Dave. I've never known media to be "arrested" or "charged" for leaking. If Durham indicts someone in the media for passing along classified information, that's a different matter but he'd better be sure who did so or it could spark a nasty Constitutional fight over free speech or freedom of the Press. We don't need that battle right now as much as we need convictions of those in Government at least who actually broke the Law.

Hope you're right, but as I said I have my doubts. Look at Hillary? Her lyin' illegal *** STILL hasn't been charged yet!
Exactly. There’s too many people involved. This corruption involves the FBI and CIA. Do we expect them to investigate and indict themselves? It’s wishful thinking
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,296
113
Exactly. There’s too many people involved. This corruption involves the FBI and CIA. Do we expect them to investigate and indict themselves? It’s wishful thinking

What you've posted here is at the heart of my skepticism that anyone will ever be convicted if they're even indicted. These Deep State operatives protect the swamp above all else, and they'll fall on their swords to keep it protected rather than volunteer a few scalps.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,351
2,439
113
I would not go after the so called journalist if for nothing else it would be bad optics, they would claim it's there job to say what they heard & they would be correct.......
Curb stomp & then hang the leakers...
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,690
6,296
113
I would not go after the so called journalist if for nothing else it would be bad optics, they would claim it's there job to say what they heard & they would be correct.......
Curb stomp & then hang the leakers...

I'm with you on this. Not a good idea to indict reporters who will always claim "freedom of the press" as a Defense. Go after the actual leakers who's job it was to protect classified information, not pass it along to those snakes in the media.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
I don't know Dave. I've never known media to be "arrested" or "charged" for leaking. If Durham indicts someone in the media for passing along classified information, that's a different matter but he'd better be sure who did so or it could spark a nasty Constitutional fight over free speech or freedom of the Press. We don't need that battle right now as much as we need convictions of those in Government at least who actually broke the Law.

Hope you're right, but as I said I have my doubts. Look at Hillary? Her lyin' illegal *** STILL hasn't been charged yet!
This is more than passing along information. These journos were part of the game.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
I'm with you on this. Not a good idea to indict reporters who will always claim "freedom of the press" as a Defense. Go after the actual leakers who's job it was to protect classified information, not pass it along to those snakes in the media.
Freedom of the press is not freedom to violate federal laws.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
No one is getting charged when all is said and done. This will be another Clinton Server. Where clear laws were broken, but no one will be punished for them being broken.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
No one is getting charged when all is said and done. This will be another Clinton Server. Where clear laws were broken, but no one will be punished for them being broken.
Im not saying a lot of people will be charged but there will be a handful or two charged/indicted.