Gran deserves to be blasted and this board would go nuts if an U of L assistant coach would make such an insulting joke.
I'm sure many people would snicker at how dumb and ill-timed the joke was, but if you're actually offended by it, you're a (TRIGGER WARNING: REFERENCE TO SENSITIVE ANATOMICAL REGION) numbnuts.
If a woman made a pun to a room full of guys about ED, wet dreams, firing blanks, etc - the types of things that guys can be sensitive about - nobody would make a big fuss about it, because men in our society are (rightly) treated like grown adults who can deal with a mildly insensitive remark.
This miserable trend of treating grown women with kiddie gloves, acting like they need to be fiercely defended from many behaviors that are mildly annoying at worst ("man spreading", "man splaining", the sexism of office air conditioners, the sexism of phones that are too large.. seriously, google this ish. It's absolutely ridiculous)...
..it's patronizing, and ironically, it's mostly propagated by feminists in this day and age. This runs in stark contrast to their original notion of having "all the rights and responsibilities of men".
Most of these women apparently weren't offended, why? Because they're adults. He didn't make a damn dead baby joke. He didn't make light of the holocaust.
If your emotional state is compromised by a remark on the level that a 12 year old boy is expected to shrug off, then you're not treating yourself like an adult. Period. Pun intended.
Look, the joke wasn't funny. There's nothing clever or amusing about saying that we have 13 periods and women only have 1. There's literally no punchline. It sounds like an attempt at a joke by someone who is just learning the English language.
He also should've guessed that the joke wouldn't be popular to that crowd.
But if you're actually offended by it, then you're just showing your colors as an embarrassing SJW who just scans for keywords to be offended by.
Go join the teachers in Seattle who banned the term "brown bag lunch" from their school district because they felt it to be racially provocative.
Go join the numbskulls who want books from the turn of the century removed from the school libraries because kids might be exposed to the horror of learning about inequalities of the past and reading about slavery in a non-sterile-textbook fashion.
We've got real, actual discrimination and issues in the world, and
this deserves to get someone "blasted"? Grow a pair. Damn.