"Passing the savings on to the fan" in anticipation of revenue sharing.
Coming soon to a ticket booth near you.
Coming soon to a ticket booth near you.
but it’s not pay for play. Just remember that"Passing the savings on to the fan" in anticipation of revenue sharing.
Coming soon to a ticket booth near you.
Exactly this. Schools should have never been allowed to be involved in this. If athletes got paid to do commercials or make for profit IG posts and such on their own time, thats up for them to secure. The schools putting their hands in it have made college sports pay for play. It's only going to get messier until a better solution is in place.Like I said in the other thread, crazy how quickly this went from let them sign some autographs to adding talent fees to tickets. I didn’t have an issue with the original premise of NIL, but we are far from that original model now.
Yep and they will start to increase those tickets as time passes especially if they are selling out. The businesses never take the hit it’s always the consumers! You want a competitive team as a fan you will get it but guess what as a fan you will pay for it! They might as well just make them professionals and not even make them go for an education. It’s really going to become a joke on the amount of money these players will be taking in! When it gets to that point those players will always look real nice on my 70” big screen every game.If they extend the fee to every ticket, and assuming UT sells out all of their home games each season, that's seven home games and an extra $5.7 million towards their NIL each year.
I bet that number doubles within three years.
Indeed, I knew this NIL thing would spin out of control, but it was crazy how fast it happened. Like virtually instantly.Like I said in the other thread, crazy how quickly this went from let them sign some autographs to adding talent fees to tickets. I didn’t have an issue with the original premise of NIL, but we are far from that original model now.
As much as I hate to admit it, Tennessee is ahead of the game here. It might also be why they have landed 2 of the top 3 OTs in this football class. And not to mention, a player who gets paid in Tennessee won't have to pay state income taxes.Teams with the biggest purse strings that is loose with the money will get the kids.
If fans have to pay a talent fee as part of the cost of their season ticket cost, do they get a credit back the following year if the "talent" didn't perform well on the court?
OR, what if a team had a bunch of draft picks on the roster but only won, let's say...nine games. The talent was there, so will the coach be required to reimburse fans?
Just spit ballin'
That is a good point. Some programs tried to keep it within the rules, while others pretty much let their boosters run wild.Indeed, I knew this NIL thing would spin out of control, but it was crazy how fast it happened. Like virtually instantly.
There really was no period of time where this worked the “original premise” way they first told us it would.
Along these lines, if we’re going down this rabbit hole, let’s make things REALLY interesting and turn college sports in to pay for performance. You win, you get compensated. You lose, well, not so much.If fans have to pay a talent fee as part of the cost of their season ticket cost, do they get a credit back the following year if the "talent" didn't perform well on the court?
OR, what if a team had a bunch of draft picks on the roster but only won, let's say...nine games. The talent was there, so will the coach be required to reimburse fans?
Just spit ballin'
Exactly this. Schools should have never been allowed to be involved in this. If athletes got paid to do commercials or make for profit IG posts and such on their own time, thats up for them to secure. The schools putting their hands in it have made college sports pay for play. It's only going to get messier until a better solution is in place.
nine games seems oddly specificIf fans have to pay a talent fee as part of the cost of their season ticket cost, do they get a credit back the following year if the "talent" didn't perform well on the court?
OR, what if a team had a bunch of draft picks on the roster but only won, let's say...nine games. The talent was there, so will the coach be required to reimburse fans?
Just spit ballin'
There's no other option. Every time the NCAA tries to limit this they get taken to court and lose. The only way to actually limit this now is for players to collectively bargain and agree to restrictions. Absent that the NCAA cannot legally put restrictions on it unless Congress passes a law.Exactly this. Schools should have never been allowed to be involved in this. If athletes got paid to do commercials or make for profit IG posts and such on their own time, thats up for them to secure. The schools putting their hands in it have made college sports pay for play. It's only going to get messier until a better solution is in place.
Pro sports suckAs much as I hate to admit it, Tennessee is ahead of the game here. It might also be why they have landed 2 of the top 3 OTs in this football class. And not to mention, a player who gets paid in Tennessee won't have to pay state income taxes.
Schools with money always get the top talent anyway, but this will be about managing your NIL budget the best and still getting players who have the desire to play/win/improve over those who get lazy once they get their bag dropped.
We all knew they were semi-pro getting paid under the table before any of this was legal anyway. Assistant football coaches who were the best at hiding their illicit payments to recruits were the ones who were getting ridiculous raises because that was part of their slush budget.