FC Cincy

vhcat70

New member
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
They still suck. I don't why they even put "defenders" on the field. Waste of salary. Play 11 on 7. What a **** show. Should have been 7-1.
 

PuffyNips

Active member
Nov 13, 2001
37,987
19,626
82
The defenders were pure garbage in the 1st half. I thought they played pretty well in the 2nd half. Gave up a lot fewer chances. They have much better players than last year, but have zero chemistry at this point.

Why should it have been 7-1? They scored 2 and hell, Locadia damn near had 3 goals himself.

They're going to be a lot better than last year's dumpster fire, but still in the bottom 1/4 of the league this year.
 

vhcat70

New member
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
The defenders were pure garbage in the 1st half. I thought they played pretty well in the 2nd half. Gave up a lot fewer chances. They have much better players than last year, but have zero chemistry at this point.

Why should it have been 7-1? They scored 2 and hell, Locadia damn near had 3 goals himself.

They're going to be a lot better than last year's dumpster fire, but still in the bottom 1/4 of the league this year.
Bulls had 4/5 open shots in 1H they whiffed on. First FCC goal was a gift from the lucky midfield deflection. 3+4 = 7. 2-1 = 1. How the D on the side off the ball was nowhere to be seen was unconscionable. I couldn't tell whether the fullback wasn't getting back or sucked over to the ball side.

Yes, better in 2H but still exposed too much on D. Passing was well less than stellar whole game.

Bottom Q of league meets still suck. :p