Feinstein Calls For Investigation Into Loretta Lynch After Comey Hearing

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
http://www.redstate.com/prevaila/20...ls-investigation-loretta-lynch-comey-hearing/

It’s not every day the ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee says a political appointee of the same party needs to be investigated. But that’s exactly what Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) said on Sunday’s State of the Union on CNN of former Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s actions in regards to the Clinton email scandal.

“I think we need to know more about that,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) on Sunday’s episode of State of the Union. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”

Feinstein’s comment comes in the wake of fired F.B.I. Director James Comey’s testimony last week in which he claimed Lynch — who herself created a firestorm when she made a visit to alledgedly chitchat with Bill Clinton on the tarmac during the 2016 campaign — told him to call the FBI’s probe into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of email as Secretary of State a “matter” rather than an “investigation.”

As the legal site, LawNewz.com, pointed out, “If a probe does get underway, Feinstein, the ranking member, would have a lot of power.”

The Comey saga is apparently far from over.
 

eerdoc

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
24,013
24
38
http://www.redstate.com/prevaila/20...ls-investigation-loretta-lynch-comey-hearing/

It’s not every day the ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee says a political appointee of the same party needs to be investigated. But that’s exactly what Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) said on Sunday’s State of the Union on CNN of former Obama administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s actions in regards to the Clinton email scandal.

“I think we need to know more about that,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) on Sunday’s episode of State of the Union. “And there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”

Feinstein’s comment comes in the wake of fired F.B.I. Director James Comey’s testimony last week in which he claimed Lynch — who herself created a firestorm when she made a visit to alledgedly chitchat with Bill Clinton on the tarmac during the 2016 campaign — told him to call the FBI’s probe into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of email as Secretary of State a “matter” rather than an “investigation.”

As the legal site, LawNewz.com, pointed out, “If a probe does get underway, Feinstein, the ranking member, would have a lot of power.”

The Comey saga is apparently far from over.
Feinstein and most other Liberals are very late to the party. Many who were reading and paying attention to FACT during the campaign (and even before if we want to see out the mis deeds of Mr. Holder) KNEW she was a political hack and not serving the people in her capacity. She was a poor choice to replace a miserable initial choice. Nice to see a Liberal spot an obvious misdeed and say it needs to be investigated. Now lets see if anything really happens?
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Feinstein and most other Liberals are very late to the party. Many who were reading and paying attention to FACT during the campaign (and even before if we want to see out the mis deeds of Mr. Holder) KNEW she was a political hack and not serving the people in her capacity. She was a poor choice to replace a miserable initial choice. Nice to see a Liberal spot an obvious misdeed and say it needs to be investigated. Now lets see if anything really happens?

If you stop and think about it, Comey testified that he notified the intel committees in the House and the Senate that Trump was NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION. Yet, the only leaks we had were the opposite. What does that tell you about the leaker's sympathies? Lie in an attempt to stop and discredit.

I read where a GOP representative tried to "leak" this fact to the media but they would never report or print it. I wonder why?