Fernandes

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,871
6,708
113
but for year 8 in Pikiell to have an underrecruited freshmen guard as your best guard is damning...and I like J Mike
I do have concerns as to whether Pikiell will be able to coach up the talent coming in next year to the level of its potential. I am not making any Sweet 16 predictions until I actually see whether the coaching can match up to the talent.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,278
176,939
113
I do have concerns as to whether Pikiell will be able to coach up the talent coming in next year to the level of its potential. I am not making any Sweet 16 predictions until I actually see whether the coaching can match up to the talent.

Its a concern because managing egos will now play a bigger role
 

RUInsanityToo

All-American
May 5, 2006
9,513
9,820
113
Not convinced we have a viable high-major guard on the roster. Need portal help for Harper who should be the primary ballhandler.

JMike for me with an entire freshman year under his belt. We'll see how it pans out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RutgersChow

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
2,945
2,459
0
Simpson is now at 29.2% from 3 on the year. He had an 0 for 12 stretch before hitting that game winning shot. Small sample size, but that's not good.

Fernandes needs to be more aggressive at Ohio State.
Baker shot about 1% above that for his career, got less than 2.5 rpg, and was a sub par on the ball defender, and everyone thought he was great. Difference was he played with better players.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,403
148,452
113
I have no idea what Pike saw in him. He's tiny, can't shoot, and is slow for that size. The other headscratcher is he plays him. Dude should sit at the end of the bench. He's not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAC93

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,403
148,452
113
36.7% from 3 isn't great for a short guard who gets manhandled. All I know is what I see if that's what we get, it's not nearly enough.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Isn't great is a far cry from can't shoot, and 36.7% is pretty good.

He's also pretty good from the line, averages >2.5 stls a game, and had a good assist / turnover ratio. It's fairly obvious what Pike saw in him. He hasn't lived up to his previous performance so far this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcg88 and RUChoppin

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,403
148,452
113
Cam Spencer shot 43.7%. He had more steals and a better assist to turnover ratio. He also didn't get manhandled on defense. If it's just numbers and that's who he is replacing, it was a poor replacement. I believe Cam left at a bad time so it's hard to really say but maybe Fernandes was brought in as practice fodder and wasn't expected to play this much.

Fernandes is shooting the same percentage from 3 as Paul Mulcahy and Paul offered far more on both defense and rebounding.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Also, and people get annoyed every time I point this out but I'm going to do it anyway, even entire college career stats are completely inadequate on their own to tell how good a three point shooters someone is. This guy has taken 286 threes in his career. If every shot was identical and had a 1/3 chance to go in then almost HALF the time he'd be <= 31.12% or >= 35.31% after 286 attempts, and the 95% confidence interval for his actual success rate through 286 attempts would span all the way from 27.97% to 38.81%. And this actually understates the variance which is increased when the shots are not identical and the skill level is not constant.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Cam Spencer shot 43.7%. He had more steals and a better assist to turnover ratio. He also didn't get manhandled on defense. If it's just numbers and that's who he is replacing, it was a poor replacement. I believe Cam left at a bad time so it's hard to really say but maybe Fernandes was brought in as practice fodder and wasn't expected to play this much.

Fernandes is shooting the same percentage from 3 as Paul Mulcahy and Paul offered far more on both defense and rebounding.
This is completely irrelevant as Pike did not push out Cam in order to get Fernandes. Cam wasn't/isn't an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,071
15,451
72
I wonder if Pike had an inkling that Paul wasn’t coming back, and that’s why he picked up Noah when he had the chance.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,403
148,452
113
This is completely irrelevant as Pike did not push out Cam in order to get Fernandes. Cam wasn't/isn't an option.

I buy that, but maybe someone better than Fernandes was. He ain't it. If that's the best we could have done in that situation than all good. I'd play the guys who we are going to play next year.
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,968
9,370
113
He’s 36.7% from three for his career. Declaring that he can’t shoot based on his 36 attempts this season is absurd.
This is not correct. Derek is 35.7% FG% (123 for 345) for his career and only 23.8% from 3P% (20 for 84) for his career. He is 7 for 24 from 3 this season. Small sample size, true.

He has been awesome at the FT line this year, to give props where it is due.

Derek Simpson stats from scarletknights.com

Baker was 32.6% from 3 in his career, almost 9% higher than Simpson's current career 3Pt%. That is a MASSIVE difference.

Geo Baker career stats
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
This is not correct. Derek is 35.7% FG% (123 for 345) for his career and only 23.8% from 3P% (20 for 84) for his career. He is 7 for 24 from 3 this season. Small sample size, true.

He has been awesome at the FT line this year, to give props where it is due.

Derek Simpson stats from scarletknights.com

Baker was 32.6% from 3 in his career, almost 9% higher than Simpson's current career 3Pt%. That is a MASSIVE difference.

Geo Baker career stats
I thought we were talking about Fernandes? My stats are for Fernandes.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Cam Spencer shot 43.7%. He had more steals and a better assist to turnover ratio. He also didn't get manhandled on defense. If it's just numbers and that's who he is replacing, it was a poor replacement. I believe Cam left at a bad time so it's hard to really say but maybe Fernandes was brought in as practice fodder and wasn't expected to play this much.

Fernandes is shooting the same percentage from 3 as Paul Mulcahy and Paul offered far more on both defense and rebounding.
Basically everyone in the country is a worse shooter than Cam

Noah's career 3 point stats are the best on the entire roster
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluoxetine

RutgersChow

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
2,945
2,459
0
This is a continued trend of Noah showing little aggressiveness. This team is in desperate need of a guy to try and take over when the offense goes stagnate.

He does not seem to be looking for shots, penetrating, etc.

Like some mention it almost seems like a confidence thing at this point. 4 FGA in 29 mins is bad.

At least hyatt, Simpson, Cliff attempt to take over games. They may have limitations of their own but at least the compete level is there.

It is very unclear what the plan for Noah was/is
You really can't be that aggressive if you're slower than the guy guarding you.
 

RutgersChow

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
2,945
2,459
0
This is not correct. Derek is 35.7% FG% (123 for 345) for his career and only 23.8% from 3P% (20 for 84) for his career. He is 7 for 24 from 3 this season. Small sample size, true.

He has been awesome at the FT line this year, to give props where it is due.

Derek Simpson stats from scarletknights.com

Baker was 32.6% from 3 in his career, almost 9% higher than Simpson's current career 3Pt%. That is a MASSIVE difference.

Geo Baker career stats
Those 3-pt. percentages compare Baker's five year average with Simpson's freshman year plus 11 games - not yet comparable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,642
38,123
113
but for year 8 in Pikiell to have an underrecruited freshmen guard as your best guard is damning...and I like J Mike

Wonder how much the Covid year also impacted his approach to recruiting. Pike seems like the kind of coach who avoids running kids off - something I like and is important (plus I think giving a scholly to Aiden is a great culture move) - but keeping guys around for 5 years from the early classes, before we had success might have hampered him a bit. Not to mention the uncertainty in managing a roster into May, well after the recruits have signed and the portal is barren.
 

SJScarlet

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2006
1,993
2,405
83
Also, and people get annoyed every time I point this out but I'm going to do it anyway, even entire college career stats are completely inadequate on their own to tell how good a three point shooters someone is. This guy has taken 286 threes in his career. If every shot was identical and had a 1/3 chance to go in then almost HALF the time he'd be <= 31.12% or >= 35.31% after 286 attempts, and the 95% confidence interval for his actual success rate through 286 attempts would span all the way from 27.97% to 38.81%. And this actually understates the variance which is increased when the shots are not identical and the skill level is not constant.
Wrong. You can tell pretty quickly what somebody is or isn’t. Myles Mack (2012) was a fantastic shooter, you could just see it, shot 46% from 3. But that Myles Mack (2014) guy was mediocre at best, shot 32%.
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,968
9,370
113
Those 3-pt. percentages compare Baker's five year average with Simpson's freshman year plus 11 games - not yet comparable.
That's fair. Baker's percentages did fall off his last three years when he was the main man after being more of a complementary player (albeit with a lot of minutes) his first two. I think some of that drop-off was the ball ending up in Baker's hands late in the shot clock, forcing to make something happen. I wonder who has the advanced analytics that say how guys shoot early or late in the shot clock or at the end of a half when just heaving up a desperation bomb.

My biggest concern with Simpson might be he doesn't look like he went through an offseason with the S&C guys to add some muscle to his frame. Hopefully that 0-12 stretch from deep was just a slump and he will continue to break out of it tonight. He is the guy I want on the FT line for us late in a close game.
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,968
9,370
113
Getting back to Fernandes... man, his scoring is so inconsistent this season!

Five games of 3 pts or less (3 x2, 1, 0 x2)
Five games of 9-13 pts (13, 12, 10x2, 9)
Two games of 19 (St. Peter's and SHU)

He's also been money at the FT line (28-33), which is just so important for a PG when trying to close out a win.

Which version of Fernandes will we get tonight?
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
That's fair. Baker's percentages did fall off his last three years when he was the main man after being more of a complementary player (albeit with a lot of minutes) his first two. I think some of that drop-off was the ball ending up in Baker's hands late in the shot clock, forcing to make something happen. I wonder who has the advanced analytics that say how guys shoot early or late in the shot clock or at the end of a half when just heaving up a desperation bomb.

My biggest concern with Simpson might be he doesn't look like he went through an offseason with the S&C guys to add some muscle to his frame. Hopefully that 0-12 stretch from deep was just a slump and he will continue to break out of it tonight. He is the guy I want on the FT line for us late in a close game.
Baker's first two seasons had a closer arc, too, fwiw.
 

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
123,214
57,179
113
For all the guff that Simpson is taking in here can we turn it to this guy?

It is very obvious he is not a high major player.

No confidence, poor d, hesitant. If this is a lost season and J-Mike stays healthy, I need to see him a majority of the time. I was willing to give it time but I do not see how he competes in B1G play.

Need to know what we have for next year so we know what to get in the portal.
Tough.....tough loss....BUT can you please throw this out there before EVERY game? Thx!
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Noah started hot til he went to the bench. Came back in and had a brutal end of the 1st half. Had some moments in the 2nd

Hit a few big shots, but he was 1-6 from 3 with 0 assists 0 steals. It wasn't exactly great but he at least he did show up and play more aggressively. Added 5 boards
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletR30

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Great performances by both Simpson and Fernandes tonight. Too bad Ohio State was red hot in the first half. On to Iowa.
They made shots. Thats it. They didnt make players around them better. They werent great on D. They knocked down shots that so far have been low percentage looks.

There was one guy that really had a meaningful impact on the game. In a net positive way
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcg88

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Noah started hot til he went to the bench. Came back in and had a brutal end of the 1st half. Had some moments in the 2nd

Hit a few big shots, but he was 1-6 from 3 with 0 assists 0 steals. It wasn't exactly great but he at least he did show up and play more aggressively. Added 5 boards
They (noah and derek) did help out on the boards….which helped eliminated the defensive rebounding problem. Credit to them there
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and PaKnight

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
They made shots. Thats it. They didnt make players around them better. They werent great on D. They knocked down shots that so far have been low percentage looks.

There was one guy that really had a meaningful impact on the game. In a net positive way
Williams?

Anyone have his plus minus tonight?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG

bitnez

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
6,406
7,008
113
They made shots. Thats it. They didnt make players around them better. They werent great on D. They knocked down shots that so far have been low percentage looks.

There was one guy that really had a meaningful impact on the game. In a net positive way

This. It’s great that our guards scored but they didnt get the other guys involved. We need to share the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RutgersChow

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
2,945
2,459
0
Its a concern because managing egos will now play a bigger ro
Isn't great is a far cry from can't shoot, and 36.7% is pretty good.

He's also pretty good from the line, averages >2.5 stls a game, and had a good assist / turnover ratio. It's fairly obvious what Pike saw in him. He hasn't lived up to his previous performance so far this season.
His 3 pt. shooting % was against 5'10" - 6'1" guards, and not the 6'3" - 6'5" guards he'll be seeing the B1G. Closeouts become a lot tougher to shoot over.
 

Jerseylegends

All-Conference
Mar 15, 2023
1,576
1,686
113
First game Fernandes actually looked similar to what I expected. Looks like he lost some weight and toned up a little from the first game as well
He's coming along..