Warrick’s 3 wasn’t a 3. Foot was on the line. Surprised refs didn’t review.
Final Score should have been 91-82
- Thread starter Possum
- Start date
Yes, it was pretty obvious....look at the ref. I couldn't believe that they didn't change that during the first three throw. If it was different the last few minutes it could have changed the way the game was played at the end. Unbelievable!
How do they not review that
The ref is looking right at it!Warrick’s 3 wasn’t a 3. Foot was on the line. Surprised refs didn’t review.
doesn’t care!Ref was still holding out hope for a Mizery cover.
This is a horrible angle tell where the guys toe was. There was a similar angle on a play in the Bama game where a Bama player dove for the ball and it looked like his shoulder was clearly on the sideline but it was a good 18 inches away from it. It’s also impossible to tell where the refs eyes are looking, so I dont know how everyone thinks he’s clearly looking at it.
Good lord man, his foot is clearly on the line. Gtfo
That's on the line and you know it. Stop defending bad officiating.
Flipped it for a better “angle” Smh
Yeah no excuse for missing that. We all saw it LIVE and made a better call than the dude 10 feet away. AND they still got it wrong on review.
There is no job in the world where you can be as incompetent as an SEC ref and still keep going.
Is it possible there is a league with worse officiating? It's like they try to be horrible.