Toggle sidebar

Fiona Hill

C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
A portion of her opening statement.

When the last of the local mines closed in the 1960s, my
father wanted to emigrate to the United States to work in
the coal mines in West Virginia, or in Pennsylvania. But
his mother, my grandmother, had been crippled from hard
labor. My father couldn’t leave, so he stayed in northern
England until he died in 2012. My mother still lives in my
hometown today.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Another portion of her opening statement.

Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of
you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and
its security services did not conduct a campaign against
our country—and that perhaps, somehow, for some
reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has
been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security
services themselves.
The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power
that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in
2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence
agencies, confirmed in bipartisan Congressional reports. It
is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details
must remain classified.
 
Airport

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,341
7,088
113
countryroads89 said:
A portion of her opening statement.

When the last of the local mines closed in the 1960s, my
father wanted to emigrate to the United States to work in
the coal mines in West Virginia, or in Pennsylvania. But
his mother, my grandmother, had been crippled from hard
labor. My father couldn’t leave, so he stayed in northern
England until he died in 2012. My mother still lives in my
hometown today.
Click to expand...
Whoopty fvcking do
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
countryroads89 said:
Another portion of her opening statement.

Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of
you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and
its security services did not conduct a campaign against
our country—and that perhaps, somehow, for some
reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has
been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security
services themselves.
The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power
that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in
2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence
agencies, confirmed in bipartisan Congressional reports. It
is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details
must remain classified.
Click to expand...
This can't be true!!! obviously she's a Never Trumper!!
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,243
3,306
113
countryroads89 said:
Another portion of her opening statement.

Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of
you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and
its security services did not conduct a campaign against
our country—and that perhaps, somehow, for some
reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has
been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security
services themselves.
The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power
that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in
2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence
agencies, confirmed in bipartisan Congressional reports. It
is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details
must remain classified.
Click to expand...
WTF? We’ve had the Mueller report already. The House report, and the Senate report. Who gives a ****.
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
countryroads89 said:
Another portion of her opening statement.

Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of
you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and
its security services did not conduct a campaign against
our country—and that perhaps, somehow, for some
reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has
been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security
services themselves.
The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power
that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in
2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence
agencies, confirmed in bipartisan Congressional reports. It
is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details
must remain classified.
Click to expand...

 
R

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,350
2,437
113
I give less than zero fu$ks about her dad or mom or anyone else( I'm sure they are great, wonderful & just fu$king dynOmyte motherfu$kers) I just want to know what facts she has pertaining to this case ...& another little petpeeve I have , why does each & ever maggot on the committee have to spend time kissing there *** before they start questioning....they cant stop politicking long enough to ask questions.....hate all the bastards...
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
countryroads89 said:
I know why they held these two to testify last.

F'ucking BRUTAL! Damn! Just damn!

Click to expand...
I know it hasnt been mentioned before or even yesterday but every day you say this and at the end of every day the GOP shoves these witnesses up your *** and pulls the pin leaving a mess if kubtrybrains for the janitors to clean up.
 
B

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
countryroads89 said:
Another portion of her opening statement.

Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of
you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and
its security services did not conduct a campaign against
our country—and that perhaps, somehow, for some
reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has
been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security
services themselves.
The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power
that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in
2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence
agencies, confirmed in bipartisan Congressional reports. It
is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details
must remain classified.
Click to expand...
I listened to the whole testimony this morning while driving and I’m impressed with both witnesses. Both have their **** straight.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,950
1,667
113
Who knows what Fiona Hill believes.
She had to admit that she authored an Washington Post op-ed in 2015 in which she opposed sending weapons to help Ukraine......Now she believes they should get weapons.
She also said shot down pencilnecks assertion that Russian colluded with Trump to affect the 2016 election.
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
bornaneer said:
Who knows what Fiona Hill believes.
She had to admit that she authored an Washington Post op-ed in 2015 in which she opposed sending weapons to help Ukraine......Now she believes they should get weapons.
She also said shot down Trump's assertion that Ukraine interfered with the 2016 election.
Click to expand...
FIFY
 
S

Shirley Knott

Redshirt
May 26, 2017
12,831
0
0
countryroads89 said:
A portion of her opening statement.

When the last of the local mines closed in the 1960s, my
father wanted to emigrate to the United States to work in
the coal mines in West Virginia, or in Pennsylvania. But
his mother, my grandmother, had been crippled from hard
labor. My father couldn’t leave, so he stayed in northern
England until he died in 2012. My mother still lives in my
hometown today.
Click to expand...
KKuntry: "I'm so enthralled with Fionas beauty that I must report his every word...................Wood if I could".
 
3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,156
113
bamaEER said:
Not listening to the afternoon testimony, but his opening remarks this morning were really just an unfocused whiny rant.
Click to expand...

"Presumptions? That's better than direct evidence! Must impeach!" -The desperate left
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
bamaEER said:
Not listening to the afternoon testimony, but his opening remarks this morning were really just an unfocused whiny rant.
Click to expand...

He is asking a bunch of questions trying to tie either of these two to the Steel Dossier and getting zero.

There are actually moments where you can see him, non-verbally squirm to the point where you know he is thinking, "oh my god, I wished I wouldn't have asked that question. I hope Dr. Hill would just stop answering the question because this is horrible."

HAHAHAHAHAHA.
 
B

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
countryroads89 said:
He is asking a bunch of questions trying to tie either of these two to the Steel Dossier and getting zero.

There are actually moments where you can see him, non-verbally squirm to the point where you know he is thinking, "oh my god, I wished I wouldn't have asked that question. I hope Dr. Hill would just stop answering the question because this is horrible."

HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Click to expand...
Both Hill and Holmes are sharp and not gonna budge to that BS.
 
M

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
atlkvb said:
The Russians attempted to interfere with the election, but the DOJ says they didn't change one vote. They failed and so did Hillary.
Click to expand...
That's a great claim, but how do you measure that? How do you measure the opposite, that they did change some votes?

This is where I think part of Hill's testimony was really good. She pointed out that it didn't matter who won the 2016 election. The Russians were trying to pit folks against each other and raise questions as to the validity of the results. It would have been the same problem if the election results were different.

With respect to these hearings, they are about a different issue related to Ukraine.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,681
6,286
113
It just amazes me how we hear two different testimonies depending on if you are a TDS infected and hate Trump or see him as our last hope against Socialist control.
mule_eer said:
That's a great claim, but how do you measure that? How do you measure the opposite, that they did change some votes?

This is where I think part of Hill's testimony was really good. She pointed out that it didn't matter who won the 2016 election. The Russians were trying to pit folks against each other and raise questions as to the validity of the results. It would have been the same problem if the election results were different.

With respect to these hearings, they are about a different issue related to Ukraine.
Click to expand...

I'm simply going on what the DOJ said about the investigation into the Russian's attempts to tamper with the election. They said no votes were changed, not me Mule. As for Hill, she contradicted Schiff's claim that the Russians were working for Trump.
 
B

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
mule_eer said:
That's a great claim, but how do you measure that? How do you measure the opposite, that they did change some votes?

This is where I think part of Hill's testimony was really good. She pointed out that it didn't matter who won the 2016 election. The Russians were trying to pit folks against each other and raise questions as to the validity of the results. It would have been the same problem if the election results were different.

With respect to these hearings, they are about a different issue related to Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Bingo. She beautifully explained this. Their intent is to destabilize our faith in govt, regardless of who is in power.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,243
3,306
113
bamaEER said:
Bingo. She beautifully explained this. Their intent is to destabilize our faith in govt, regardless of who is in power.
Click to expand...
It’s basically what we on the right have been saying since Jan of 2016. And you guys went all in on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom