Franklin wrecked this team.

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,381
2,698
113
So, Franklin couldn't pull in talent, couldn't develop talent the talent he didn't pull in, couldn't coach the non-talent he had on gameday, couldn't bring in good assistant coaches and staff to help him coach ...

And, yet, after being involved in an almost program-destroying scandal that took place during the previous regime some folks worship, and with area talent dwindling ... under his leadership, we rebounded to be one of the most successful programs in the nation while he was here and, for the most part, went toe-to-toe with all the awesome teams we'd eventually lose to.

Something about this narrative just doesn't add up ...
O'Brien was the previous regime and the man that dealt with the scandal. Paterno wasn't the previous regime. Franklin's job was infinitely easier due to how Franklin left.

He's a program builder but not a great coach. Reality.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,381
2,698
113
I have a feeling the next few years a lot of posters are going to see what a struggling program really looks like.
That's what you hope happens
It's so odd how that people are so terrified of improving and being truly relevant.
 

Ludd

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,580
3,959
113
That's what you hope happens
It's so odd how that people are so terrified of improving and being truly relevant.
It’s absolutely not what I hope happens….i want to win and I don’t care who the coach is. However, I’ll take 10-2 in most years regardless of who the losses are to. I swear many on here would rather go 8-4 with a win over OSU than 10-2 with a loss to the .
 
  • Like
Reactions: NitFan89 and G3624

lion97

Redshirt
Sep 29, 2025
17
28
13
The knock on Franklin was always "game day coaching" or lack thereof. But, the consensus was that he was a great recruiter and "CEO" type coach who could manage the team. Given the lack of talent and depth, the recruiting and "judge of talent" comes into question. There is also the question of "player development" which I saw very little of. Generational talents like Saquon and Warren were often misused (e.g. - Saquon as a decoy or Warren in gimmick plays) and QBs simply not developed and/or scheme not modified to use their talents. As for CEO-type coach, Franklin went thru coordinators like drivers go thru tires at a NASCAR race. Sure, some left for greener pastures, but I can't remember any coordinator that anyone "wishes we had now" as an OC or HC. In most cases, there were few tears shed when they were left or fired.
Point being, this bad dish has been simmering for years. Franklin had enough talent to win games against middling competition but not the big dogs. But the coaching hires he made aren't going to be better now that he's gone. This team needs a complete rebuild, top to bottom.
Kraft should not have fired Franklin after last week.
Kraft could have still been maneuvering in the background on a new coach. Instead of getting sympathy from the likes of Saban, etc and telling ESPN and everyone who will listen he was "shocked, shocked, SHOCKED" that he was fired, this f*cker should be owning this disaster. They should have left him to twist in the wind, until the pressure got too great that he quits on his own, given how important his media standing is to him.

After 3-6, no one would give a sh*t what Franklin has to say
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sharkies
Nov 1, 2021
257
331
63
This is a case of taking a step back to take 2 forward. Beats knowing you'll always lose to MI/OSU and all other big games.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,381
2,698
113
It’s absolutely not what I hope happens….i want to win and I don’t care who the coach is. However, I’ll take 10-2 in most years regardless of who the losses are to. I swear many on here would rather go 8-4 with a win over OSU than 10-2 with a loss to the .
It is though. Your constant support and defense of Fraklin proves that
10-2 is pointless if you can't contend for a title.
He couldn't beat anyone with a pulse. No one. Even in playoff last year he got the easiest schedule of all time and failed to reach the title game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slwlion01 and PSU87

Ludd

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,580
3,959
113
It is though. Your constant support and defense of Fraklin proves that
10-2 is pointless if you can't contend for a title.
He couldn't beat anyone with a pulse. No one. Even in playoff last year he got the easiest schedule of all time and failed to reach the title game.
He beat plenty of teams with a pulse. Some of you act like we play in the MAC. Ridiculous. And I support and defend him because he was our coach and I like him as a coach. Sorry that doesn’t match your thoughts. If I like the next guy, and he goes 10-2 a lot, I will support him as well. He did a ton for this program even if many are too thick to see it. And I don’t feel entitled to 12-0 and a NC every year because I’ve been a PSU fan for a long time and I’m used to being a solid but not great program.
 

Mufasa94

Senior
Jan 9, 2009
1,105
944
113
It’s absolutely not what I hope happens….i want to win and I don’t care who the coach is. However, I’ll take 10-2 in most years regardless of who the losses are to. I swear many on here would rather go 8-4 with a win over OSU than 10-2 with a loss to the .
Where does this 10-2 most years apply? Not in the 20s and not during Franklin’s PSU time. It was half the time, and then about half those good times, he’d end up losing the bowl game to lose the warm and fuzzy feelings.

Maybe PSU should have kept him around for a few more games so he’d get the true credit he deserves on his record for this sh*tshow season.
 

J.E.B

All-Conference
Jul 8, 2001
2,133
3,096
113
Franklin was a good recruiter and good developer of talent. But he wasn’t great. Terrible game day coach. Penn State should dominate the region and they don’t! Never have. That needs to change with the new hire.

You have 13 states to recruit from in the Penn State footprint and it must dominate that area. That talent pool can compete vs. other regions with big time recruits coming out of Pa., Va, Md, DC, NJ… great support talent coming from NY and NE. Del and WV are dead zones but not necessary.
 

Ludd

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,580
3,959
113
Where does this 10-2 most years apply? Not in the 20s and not during Franklin’s PSU time. It was half the time, and then about half those good times, he’d end up losing the bowl game to lose the warm and fuzzy feelings.

Maybe PSU should have kept him around for a few more games so he’d get the true credit he deserves on his record for this sh*tshow season.
Three out of the last four years…I would consider that most years. The fact he could do it at all in his first five years was a testament to him considering the **** show he took over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NitFan89

Nitt1300

Heisman
Nov 2, 2008
6,639
12,446
113
I have a feeling the next few years a lot of posters are going to see what a struggling program really looks like.
They got what they asked for, I hope they don't cry now- or for the next few years.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,381
2,698
113
He beat plenty of teams with a pulse. Some of you act like we play in the MAC. Ridiculous. And I support and defend him because he was our coach and I like him as a coach. Sorry that doesn’t match your thoughts. If I like the next guy, and he goes 10-2 a lot, I will support him as well. He did a ton for this program even if many are too thick to see it. And I don’t feel entitled to 12-0 and a NC every year because I’ve been a PSU fan for a long time and I’m used to being a solid but not great program.
Who's his last quality win?
Boise State or SMU...come on.
What happened this year is indefensible.
You can give him credit for helping to build the program while admitting he hit his ceiling and needed to go. Just like Richt was a good guy and a good coach.
I've never asked for 12-0. I'm asking for it not to essentially be an automatic loss when we play teams with a pulse.
Hell 10-2 this year would have been fine but then he stopped beating bad teams when he was 20 point favorites.
Why do you want to be a solid but not great program? You acknowledging that is why he had to go.
 

step.eng69

All-Conference
Nov 7, 2012
3,308
4,527
113
I don't have any inside information but my take from two time zones away is there isn't any team chemistry or commitment. This is college football in 2025. We have a bunch of hired guns with no commitment to the team or school.
MHL,
My thoughts:

I believe the word you are looking for is Mercenary. Latin merces meaning ("wages" or "pay")

Quality Mercenaries' hires can change the outcome of team wins, offering the means of (CFP) championships to anyone who can afford it. It alters the who, the how and the why they are pugnacious, the ultra-wealthy schools will become new superpowers of semi-pro college football.

I believe we are on the verge of developing a Super-Conference of 25+/- of the best teams competing for a Conference Championship, where it will be common for the finalists to have 2-3 losses going into the Championship game.
 
Last edited:

Ludd

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,580
3,959
113
Who's his last quality win?
Boise State or SMU...come on.
What happened this year is indefensible.
You can give him credit for helping to build the program while admitting he hit his ceiling and needed to go. Just like Richt was a good guy and a good coach.
I've never asked for 12-0. I'm asking for it not to essentially be an automatic loss when we play teams with a pulse.
Hell 10-2 this year would have been fine but then he stopped beating bad teams when he was 20 point favorites.
Why do you want to be a solid but not great program? You acknowledging that is why he had to go.
Well, he was 11-1 last year and that wasn’t good enough, but you’re not expecting 12-0…ok, got it. And as you’re seeing this year with UCLA and NW, there have been many teams he beat that had a pulse. Just because a team isn’t top 10 doesn’t mean they’re easy .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NitFan89

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,381
2,698
113
Well, he was 11-1 last year and that wasn’t good enough, but you’re not expecting 12-0…ok, got it. And as you’re seeing this year with UCLA and NE, there have been many teams he beat that had a pulse. Just because a team isn’t top 10 doesn’t mean they’re easy .
When did I complain about regular season last year? Pretty sure I never did.
A team with a pulse needs to have comparable talent to us...we play those games about twice a year.
 

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
4,381
2,698
113
And the next and the next and the next…sounds like a great plan. Ask a million other programs how that works.
Don't miss. The stated objective to win titles. We all agree CJF wasn't capable. I'm not sure what you want at this point. He had to go. He's gone. Hopefully we hire the right guy if not oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slwlion01

Ludd

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
3,580
3,959
113
Don't miss. The stated objective to win titles. We all agree CJF wasn't capable. I'm not sure what you want at this point. He had to go. He's gone. Hopefully we hire the right guy if not oh well.
So if the object is to win titles, then almost no program is successful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NitFan89

slwlion01

Senior
Jul 24, 2023
365
509
93
He beat plenty of teams with a pulse. Some of you act like we play in the MAC. Ridiculous. And I support and defend him because he was our coach and I like him as a coach. Sorry that doesn’t match your thoughts. If I like the next guy, and he goes 10-2 a lot, I will support him as well. He did a ton for this program even if many are too thick to see it. And I don’t feel entitled to 12-0 and a NC every year because I’ve been a PSU fan for a long time and I’m used to being a solid but not great program.
Well I've been a fan for a long time as well and am used to a great program not a solid program.
 

Mufasa94

Senior
Jan 9, 2009
1,105
944
113
Three out of the last four years…I would consider that most years.
Haha, ok. Selectively choosing a timeframe.
The fact he could do it at all in his first five years was a testament to him considering the **** show he took over.
He did a good job ‘16. I won’t say great because 3 losses, with one being to Pitt and another when your team scored 49, well, that isn’t great.

‘17 was another good job, but that’s the really what might have been season if it had been a great job.

He had multiple other good years outside of the first 5 seasons also. I never said he had to be fired until this season, the timing of it is the only question.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
3,853
2,665
113
One thing we know for sure, all of our losses will be the coach’s fault unless it’s someone they like, then the losses will be Franklin’s fault.

Oh, Franklin will be the built-in excuse for these dingleberries for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ludd

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
3,853
2,665
113
I have a feeling the next few years a lot of posters are going to see what a struggling program really looks like.
Too early to say that, but it could easily be the case.

You knew that was the situation when the never-Frankliners, who have been whining about him for years, could never identify a reasonable alternative for Franklin while he was still employed. And then, when they finally got their wish, and Franklin was gone, their suggested replacements were ridiculous never-gonna-happens ... and then some blank stares when they realized the more realistic options weren't very exciting/definite improvements.