Northwestern (3-0) hosts DePaul (3-0) tonight at Welsh-Ryan Arena. The game is set to tip at 8 pm CT and will air on BTN.
We're holding our own so far, but DePaul's offensive rebounds are concerning.This is bad.
Really concerning.We're holding our own so far, but DePaul's offensive rebounds are concerning.
We are 5 for 18 from 2-point land…Not to mention all the wide-open 3 point attempts. NU is lucky they’re missing them.
Do you think they missed on all their NIL targets, or there wasn't enough NIL to go after better targets, or was there sufficient NIL but it wasn't spent wisely? Which of those three do you think is most likely?This product on the court is really inexcusable. I don’t know if it’s Chris Collins’ fault or the athletic department’s fault or the university, but they have shirked all responsibility to assemble a basketball roster. I don’t want to knock these kids, but they simply aren’t high level college basketball players. To run this roster out there as a BIG10 team in 2026 is unacceptable.
Or maybe academic requirements limited our pool?This product on the court is really inexcusable. I don’t know if it’s Chris Collins’ fault or the athletic department’s fault or the university, but they have shirked all responsibility to assemble a basketball roster. I don’t want to knock these kids, but they simply aren’t high level college basketball players. To run this roster out there as a BIG10 team in 2026 is unacceptable.
I’m guessing the first twoDo you think they missed on all their NIL targets, or there wasn't enough NIL to go after better targets, or was there sufficient NIL but it wasn't spent wisely? Which of those three do you think is most likely?
Same requirements as always and we haven’t been this outmanned since the Kevin O’Neil years. Someone dropped the ball.Or maybe academic requirements limited our pool?
But when you add in sub-par NIL money’for NU, and just the fact that there is NIL money and lots of great players are aiming for and staying in college, it’s not the KON years.Same requirements as always and we haven’t been this outmanned since the Kevin O’Neil years. Someone dropped the ball.
Regardless of who’s at fault, this has to be a wake up call that more money needs to be spent if this team will ever be competitive again. To have zero front line is unacceptable. This program had some momentum a couple years ago and they’ve squandered it all. And there are many to blame.This product on the court is really inexcusable. I don’t know if it’s Chris Collins’ fault or the athletic department’s fault or the university, but they have shirked all responsibility to assemble a basketball roster. I don’t want to knock these kids, but they simply aren’t high level college basketball players. To run this roster out there as a BIG10 team in 2026 is unacceptable.
It is funding AND academic requirements (that get in the way of guys who are trying to earn more and more NIL money playing basketball).If there isn’t funding to build and keep a competitive team, it’s not much different.
It is funding AND academic requirements (that get in the way of guys who are trying to earn more and more NIL money playing basketball).
I would appreciate it (for no other reason) if we can stop blaming and tearing down, without evidence, the really good people who are doing their best for Northwestern.
I seem to remember (but correct me if I'm wrong) discussions that indicated that grad transfers are easier to get through admissions. Aren't grad transfers precisely the types of players we should be targeting with NIL?It is funding AND academic requirements (that get in the way of guys who are trying to earn more and more NIL money playing basketball).
I would appreciate it (for no other reason) if we can stop blaming and tearing down, without evidence, the really good people who are doing their best for Northwestern.
67 — 47I would appreciate it (for no other reason) if we can stop blaming and tearing down, without evidence, the really good people who are doing their best for Northwestern.
I think history tells us that these high-academic players are not the ones typically winning basketball championships regularly, and that a school’s winning history matters a lot to top players. We have a much smaller pool and we need way more $ (and great coaching) to offset it. But, I agree we are in as good hands currently as we could be.There are more than enough academically qualified players if the money was there. The academic requirements have been eased. The only bright side is that it looks like this season is going to be a disaster and Jackson/Chiang are not Gragg/Schill and they will not allow this program to become a perennial embarrassment.
Of having bad people in charge of our program? Give me a break.67 — 47
2nd • 00:00
This is the evidence.
Winning history means a lot less in today’s day and age when money speaks.I think history tells us that these high-academic players are not the ones typically winning basketball championships regularly, and that a school’s winning history matters a lot to top players. We have a much smaller pool and we need way more $ (and great coaching) to offset it. But, I agree we are in as good hands currently as we could be.
It shouldn't have been that close. DePaul kept heaving up 3s they couldn't make instead of pounding inside where they were totally dominant.47 points yeesh
They always limit our pool, which I’m fine with and it’s one of our noble principles, but holy **** we are bad. In fairness, colllege sports blows now. NIL killed it. I’d be much more upset if this was back when college sports was great.Same requirements as always and we haven’t been this outmanned since the Kevin O’Neil years. Someone dropped the ball.
Nobody ever gets fired in SD world. Medicracy is the high bar, existence is the expectation. Accountability is removed from the dictionary.It is funding AND academic requirements (that get in the way of guys who are trying to earn more and more NIL money playing basketball).
I would appreciate it (for no other reason) if we can stop blaming and tearing down, without evidence, the really good people who are doing their best for Northwestern.
Blaming academics would have more juice if we hadn’t just failed to retain all of the guys we wanted to retain from last year’s team. There’s evidence that, for example, Tre would be able to get past admissions, and the school wasn’t willing to hire him for a second year.It is funding AND academic requirements (that get in the way of guys who are trying to earn more and more NIL money playing basketball).
I would appreciate it (for no other reason) if we can stop blaming and tearing down, without evidence, the really good people who are doing their best for Northwestern.
And I think that the last ten years of final four participants show otherwise. Raise your hand if you could live with one final four in a lifetime. Now raise your hand if NU has reached the sweet sixteen in your lifetime.I think history tells us that these high-academic players are not the ones typically winning basketball championships regularly, and that a school’s winning history matters a lot to top players. We have a much smaller pool and we need way more $ (and great coaching) to offset it. But, I agree we are in as good hands currently as we could be.
Wildcat Report
Takeaways: Northwestern suffers third straight disappointing loss
Wildcat Report
Cats fail to capitalize on chances to upset Ohio State
Wildcat Report
Wildcats' unbeaten start deflates in listless 67-47 loss to DePaul
Wildcat Report
Fearless Forecast: Northwestern vs. No. 20 Ohio State
Wildcat Report
Notebook: Collins readies Wildcats for 'really high-level' game with rival DePaul