If people are objective, defeating global warming as an ideal is absolutely one of the easiest arguments ever.
I knew years ago it was questionable soon as i saw they removed outlier temps in forming their conclusion. Then i immediately knew it was bs soon as i saw how many outliers they removed. If theyre tracking something like temps, there are no such things as outliers. Then when you have to designate so many outliers, that in and of itself means it isnt an outlier at all.
If that wasnt enough, the neverending name change should say it all. Of course as with most things nowadays, people form their opinion first then look for facts to back it.