Global Climate Changes
- Thread starter Beatle Bum
- Start date
We have gone way too long without a weather tragedy. What is going on? This thread is dying on the vine without something to instill fear.
A quiet hurricane season so far. Climate cultists are desperately scanning the coasts for a killer storm.
Snow all over the field at the Wyoming/UNLV football game. 
Not enough Taco Bells around to muster more winds or dirty rain.
The most accurate tech finally available when we need it the most.
May 22, 2025
“In my 30 years at the National Weather Service, we’ve never had more advanced models and warning systems in place to monitor the weather,” said NOAA’s National Weather Service Director Ken Graham. “This outlook is a call to action: be prepared. Take proactive steps now to make a plan and gather supplies to ensure you're ready before a storm threatens."
The weather app I have for CarPlay was so bored it has been alerting me of hurricanes in the pacific for 8 weeks.
May 22, 2025
“In my 30 years at the National Weather Service, we’ve never had more advanced models and warning systems in place to monitor the weather,” said NOAA’s National Weather Service Director Ken Graham. “This outlook is a call to action: be prepared. Take proactive steps now to make a plan and gather supplies to ensure you're ready before a storm threatens."
The weather app I have for CarPlay was so bored it has been alerting me of hurricanes in the pacific for 8 weeks.
Over the summer, the Trump administration ordered Orsted to halt construction on its Revolution Wind project off the coast of Rhode Island — which was 80% complete and set to power more than 350,000 homes. A U.S. court overturned that order last month.
In September, Orsted cut its full-year guidance, citing lower-than-normal offshore wind speeds across its offshore portfolio.
“Today, we’ve told our employees that from now and until the end of 2027, we’ll be saying goodbye to many skilled and valued colleagues who’ve contributed greatly to Ørsted,” Rasmus Errboe, the company’s CEO, said in a statement on Thursday.
Orsted currently employs around 8,000 people worldwide, and said it would reduce its headcount by 500 before the end of this year, culminating in a total of 2,000 reductions. The firm will trim employee numbers through natural attrition, cutting positions, divestment, outsourcing, and layoffs, it said.
In September, Orsted cut its full-year guidance, citing lower-than-normal offshore wind speeds across its offshore portfolio.
“Today, we’ve told our employees that from now and until the end of 2027, we’ll be saying goodbye to many skilled and valued colleagues who’ve contributed greatly to Ørsted,” Rasmus Errboe, the company’s CEO, said in a statement on Thursday.
Orsted currently employs around 8,000 people worldwide, and said it would reduce its headcount by 500 before the end of this year, culminating in a total of 2,000 reductions. The firm will trim employee numbers through natural attrition, cutting positions, divestment, outsourcing, and layoffs, it said.
Damn wind.
You know what always provides energy? Nuclear and fossil fuels.
Here is an AI response to "do scientists deny climate change?" ... it seems most reasonable to me:
The overwhelming majority of climate scientists agree that climate change is happening and is caused by human activity; the idea of widespread scientific denial is a misconception. The scientific consensus is that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, are the principal cause of global warming. While there is debate on the speed of future impacts, this is not a denial of the core science, and many prominent scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements supporting this consensus.
The overwhelming majority of climate scientists agree that climate change is happening and is caused by human activity; the idea of widespread scientific denial is a misconception. The scientific consensus is that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, are the principal cause of global warming. While there is debate on the speed of future impacts, this is not a denial of the core science, and many prominent scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements supporting this consensus.
- Overwhelming consensus:
Numerous studies have shown that between 97% and 99.9% of actively publishing climate scientists agree that climate change is real and human-caused.
- Major organizations agree:
Major scientific organizations, including the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and national science academies, have all issued statements affirming the scientific consensus on climate change.
- Points of debate are not denial:
Disagreements among scientists do exist, but they are generally about specific details, such as the precise timing of future impacts or the best ways to address climate change, not about whether it is happening or if humans are the primary cause.
- Origins of the "no consensus" myth:
The notion that there is no consensus is a tactic used by those who deny climate change to sow doubt. This has been linked to organized campaigns by special interest groups to cast doubt on the science of climate change.
UN CARBON Emission Tax, also WSJ has an editorial this morning behind their paywall.
END THREAD/
After wasting $ trillions and destroying economies and societies, there's no longer any money in the corrupt Climate Scam. I'm guessing the $h!tbags now think AI is a better tool to reach globalist authoritarian control.
After wasting $ trillions and destroying economies and societies, there's no longer any money in the corrupt Climate Scam. I'm guessing the $h!tbags now think AI is a better tool to reach globalist authoritarian control.
Now He Tells Us: Bill Gates Backflips and Says ‘Climate Change’ No Threat to Humanity After All
END THREAD/
After wasting $ trillions and destroying economies and societies, there's no longer any money in the corrupt Climate Scam. I'm guessing the $h!tbags now think AI is a better tool to reach globalist authoritarian control.
Now He Tells Us: Bill Gates Backflips and Says ‘Climate Change’ No Threat to Humanity After All
Quite the pivot now that OLIGAWKY needs reliable power.
For all that won't believe Breitbart:
Bill Gates calls for climate fight to shift focus from curbing emissions to reducing human suffering
Bill Gates thinks climate change is a serious problem and that scientific innovation will curb it. In a memo released Tuesday, Gates argues for a strategic pivot in the global climate fight.
apnews.com
There was that chick at the last wef that said climate change was too complicated( they had fooled all they could fool) and they needed something more relatable to cause change. I think she stated water quality?
Economies and societies were destroyed in the name of climate change?
This is when I get to say that both extremes on either side are pretty similar yet neither side realizes it (or cares). One extreme wants us to believe we're on the verge of world collapse and the other extreme is claiming economies and literal societies have been destroyed. Destroyed.
Mind you, the talking point is destruction on the very afternoon Jamaica is taking on a high end Cat 5 hurricane and seeing actual destruction.
This is when I get to say that both extremes on either side are pretty similar yet neither side realizes it (or cares). One extreme wants us to believe we're on the verge of world collapse and the other extreme is claiming economies and literal societies have been destroyed. Destroyed.
Mind you, the talking point is destruction on the very afternoon Jamaica is taking on a high end Cat 5 hurricane and seeing actual destruction.
Better get the memo out ASAP. The pRoGrEsSiVe idiots still running the "Go Green" doctrine are destroying more infrastructure.
Follow the money. While the climatista's for some reason are horrified by clean nuclear energy, I think Gates is loading up on small modular reactors which will power his data/AI centers. Heck, he even reactivated 3 Mile Island which set back nuclear until now.
However, it is also true that most of the radiation was contained, and the actual release had a negligible effect on the environment and public health, with no deaths or discernible health effects attributed to the accident.
However, it is also true that most of the radiation was contained, and the actual release had a negligible effect on the environment and public health, with no deaths or discernible health effects attributed to the accident.
I remember when there were no hurricanes. Damn you carbon!!
She called Mother Nature. But can the media blame Trump like they always do.
I give him credit for admitting his mistake. Most just double down.END THREAD/
After wasting $ trillions and destroying economies and societies, there's no longer any money in the corrupt Climate Scam. I'm guessing the $h!tbags now think AI is a better tool to reach globalist authoritarian control.
Now He Tells Us: Bill Gates Backflips and Says ‘Climate Change’ No Threat to Humanity After All
Yes, its called hurricane season...it happens every year. In fact, this is one of the mildest sessons in recent years. The weather is not the climate, hurricanes making landfall doesn't mean worse climate conditions.
Thats the entire problem...its a religion. Is Jesus the son of God, is Muhammed a prophet, is hurricane climate change? It's all the same. So much so that the lunatics are going as far as child sacrifice for their God, or atlesdt in terms of not having children. Just insane ppl.
Oh no. He knew he was wrong years ago. He's just getting ahead of the curve now.
Its going to be funny watching everyone do mental gymnastics over his reversal and still demand people adhere to this insanity.
When that goblin Thunberg went from "How dare you question climate warming!" to "Free Palestine", that should have been the canary in the coal mine moment for most of these oafs.
Al Gore must be p*ssed that they are jeopardizing his lifelong grift.