Good Riddance....

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
Between June 20 and July 3, at least five executives at top entertainment and media companies leading Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have stepped down or were pushed out of their roles.
I worked at and for several major national food service,hotel and grocery companies that initiated this nonsense. I was forced to do business and hire many lesser qualified people instead of the best qualified and those that offered the best terms and products......sick....sick.....sick.

  • Disney's chief diversity officer Latondra Newton is leaving her post after leading the Mouse's DEI department since 2017.
  • Netflix's inclusion strategy chief and self-described "DEI expert" Vernā Myers is stepping down in September after five year.
  • Janelle English exited the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the Oscars) just one year after she was promoted in the newly created role as executive VP of Impact and Inclusion.
  • Karen Horne, who was laid off by Warner Bros. Discovery as its DEI senior vice president due to "reorganization" of the company's division.
  • BBC's creative diversity chief Joanna Abeyie was let go after less than two years on the job.
 
Last edited:

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Between June 20 and July 3, at least five executives at top entertainment and media companies leading Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have stepped down or were pushed out of their roles.
I work at and for several major national food service,hotel and grocery companies that initiated this nonsense. I was forced to do business and hire many lesser qualified people instead of the best qualified and those that offered the best terms and products......sick....sick.....sick.

  • Disney's chief diversity officer Latondra Newton is leaving her post after leading the Mouse's DEI department since 2017.
  • Netflix's inclusion strategy chief and self-described "DEI expert" Vernā Myers is stepping down in September after five year.
  • Janelle English exited the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the Oscars) just one year after she was promoted in the newly created role as executive VP of Impact and Inclusion.
  • Karen Horne, who was laid off by Warner Bros. Discovery as its DEI senior vice president due to "reorganization" of the company's division.
  • BBC's creative diversity chief Joanna Abeyie was let go after less than two years on the job.
GWGB
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
It's much more than that......it's about going the wrong way to correct a wrong that happened centuries ago.

The best way is to treat all people in an honest and fair way. Give ALL people the same opportunity and punish the companies and people that do not.

What is happening now is doing nothing but creating more division.
 
Last edited:

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,840
275
83
.it's about going the wrong way to correct a wrong that happened centuries ago.

It was a political and judicial bloodletting, a collective act of radical right-wing judicial activism that will have serious negative implications for the American people and the country as a whole for decades to come. These decisions by the "conservative" majority on the Supreme Court are part of a decades-long project to return American society to a time period before the civil rights movement(s) of the 1960s and 1970s and back to the Gilded Age (if not before) when white men and moneyed interests – a true tyranny of the minority —were able to exercise dominion over American society, largely uncontested.

I understand these celebrations as consistent with a right-wing effort to erase America's brutal history of racial subjugation and to deny the consequences that history has on society today. Conservatives are celebrating the myth that America is "post-racial" and the lie that events like chattel slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, "urban renewal," etc. really have no effect on contemporary society. And most of all, they are celebrating the fact that there is a Supreme Court that is willing to affirm those fictions.

I think that what we are seeing is just how hellbent the Supreme Court is on ensuring that the U.S. assumes the form that the Republican Party wants it to assume. It is important to keep in mind that the Court creates its own docket; it selects the cases that it wants to hear. And it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding to hear cases that touch on all of these hot button issues: affirmative action, abortion, guns, religious freedom, LGBTQ rights. And of course, it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding these cases in ways that are consistent with the Republican Party's platform.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,178
3,231
113
It was a political and judicial bloodletting, a collective act of radical right-wing judicial activism that will have serious negative implications for the American people and the country as a whole for decades to come. These decisions by the "conservative" majority on the Supreme Court are part of a decades-long project to return American society to a time period before the civil rights movement(s) of the 1960s and 1970s and back to the Gilded Age (if not before) when white men and moneyed interests – a true tyranny of the minority —were able to exercise dominion over American society, largely uncontested.

I understand these celebrations as consistent with a right-wing effort to erase America's brutal history of racial subjugation and to deny the consequences that history has on society today. Conservatives are celebrating the myth that America is "post-racial" and the lie that events like chattel slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, "urban renewal," etc. really have no effect on contemporary society. And most of all, they are celebrating the fact that there is a Supreme Court that is willing to affirm those fictions.

I think that what we are seeing is just how hellbent the Supreme Court is on ensuring that the U.S. assumes the form that the Republican Party wants it to assume. It is important to keep in mind that the Court creates its own docket; it selects the cases that it wants to hear. And it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding to hear cases that touch on all of these hot button issues: affirmative action, abortion, guns, religious freedom, LGBTQ rights. And of course, it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding these cases in ways that are consistent with the Republican Party's platform.
Hahahah

Translation: All of the legislating from the bench and radical progressive policies based on mere theory which have proven ineffectual, are being overturned based on sound Constitutional backing and it’s causing the radical left to have a sads.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
It was a political and judicial bloodletting, a collective act of radical right-wing judicial activism that will have serious negative implications for the American people and the country as a whole for decades to come. These decisions by the "conservative" majority on the Supreme Court are part of a decades-long project to return American society to a time period before the civil rights movement(s) of the 1960s and 1970s and back to the Gilded Age (if not before) when white men and moneyed interests – a true tyranny of the minority —were able to exercise dominion over American society, largely uncontested.

I understand these celebrations as consistent with a right-wing effort to erase America's brutal history of racial subjugation and to deny the consequences that history has on society today. Conservatives are celebrating the myth that America is "post-racial" and the lie that events like chattel slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, "urban renewal," etc. really have no effect on contemporary society. And most of all, they are celebrating the fact that there is a Supreme Court that is willing to affirm those fictions.

I think that what we are seeing is just how hellbent the Supreme Court is on ensuring that the U.S. assumes the form that the Republican Party wants it to assume. It is important to keep in mind that the Court creates its own docket; it selects the cases that it wants to hear. And it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding to hear cases that touch on all of these hot button issues: affirmative action, abortion, guns, religious freedom, LGBTQ rights. And of course, it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding these cases in ways that are consistent with the Republican Party's platform.
Here, let me turn back the clock a few times.....maybe,just maybe, you can figure it out :
I think that what we are seeing is just how hellbent the Supreme Court is on ensuring that the U.S. assumes the form that the Democrat Party wants it to assume
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,840
275
83
Here, let me turn back the clock a few times.....maybe,just maybe, you can figure it out :
I think that what we are seeing is just how hellbent the Supreme Court is on ensuring that the U.S. assumes the form that the majority of Americans wants it to assume
FIFY
Was Trump the last Repub POTUS?
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
FIFY
Was Trump the last Repub POTUS?
You idiot......sure Trump wanted to change the SCOTUS......and he did.
You don't think Pudding Brain Biden would do the same just like every POTUS has done in the past?
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,911
1,612
113
You are aware that many current Dems, including Biden, have made comment about what they would do......which amounts to "packing the Court":

Democrats are ramping up pressure on President Biden to pack the Supreme Court following a series of legal losses for the party last week.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus redoubled its efforts to confirm new justices to outweigh the current 6-3 conservative majority. Democrats have also pushed claims that the current court is illegitimate, an argument Biden himself contributed toward after the end of affirmative action last month.

"We must pass Reps. Jerry Nadler, Hank Johnson, and Mondaire Jones' Judiciary Act to add justices and expand the Supreme Court" Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a Wednesday statement.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,195
6,857
113
Between June 20 and July 3, at least five executives at top entertainment and media companies leading Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have stepped down or were pushed out of their roles.
I worked at and for several major national food service,hotel and grocery companies that initiated this nonsense. I was forced to do business and hire many lesser qualified people instead of the best qualified and those that offered the best terms and products......sick....sick.....sick.

  • Disney's chief diversity officer Latondra Newton is leaving her post after leading the Mouse's DEI department since 2017.
  • Netflix's inclusion strategy chief and self-described "DEI expert" Vernā Myers is stepping down in September after five year.
  • Janelle English exited the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the Oscars) just one year after she was promoted in the newly created role as executive VP of Impact and Inclusion.
  • Karen Horne, who was laid off by Warner Bros. Discovery as its DEI senior vice president due to "reorganization" of the company's division.
  • BBC's creative diversity chief Joanna Abeyie was let go after less than two years on the job.
All black women. We can get them a job they are qualified for, cleaning houses
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,597
812
113
I think that what we are seeing is just how hellbent the Supreme Court is on ensuring that the U.S. assumes the form that the Founding Fathers intended. It is important to keep in mind that the Court creates its own docket; it selects the cases that it wants to hear. And it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding to hear cases that touch on all of these hot button issues: affirmative action, abortion, guns, religious freedom, LGBTQ rights. And of course, it is no coincidence that the Court is deciding these cases in ways that are consistent with the constitution.
Fixed it for the mental retards.
 

Shirley Knott

Redshirt
May 26, 2017
12,831
0
0
Between June 20 and July 3, at least five executives at top entertainment and media companies leading Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have stepped down or were pushed out of their roles.
I worked at and for several major national food service,hotel and grocery companies that initiated this nonsense. I was forced to do business and hire many lesser qualified people instead of the best qualified and those that offered the best terms and products......sick....sick.....sick.

  • Disney's chief diversity officer Latondra Newton is leaving her post after leading the Mouse's DEI department since 2017.
  • Netflix's inclusion strategy chief and self-described "DEI expert" Vernā Myers is stepping down in September after five year.
  • Janelle English exited the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (the Oscars) just one year after she was promoted in the newly created role as executive VP of Impact and Inclusion.
  • Karen Horne, who was laid off by Warner Bros. Discovery as its DEI senior vice president due to "reorganization" of the company's division.
  • BBC's creative diversity chief Joanna Abeyie was let go after less than two years on the job.
Are all these execs female or just having mid-life crisis's ???