There's a very good chance you are projecting your desire (and mine) to see the Young/Nance combo as a non negotiable in our lineup.
I believe there's a better than good chance the lineup will, instead, consist of something like:
1) Buie
2) Audige
3) Williams
4) Beran
5) Nance
Why? Because that's CC's vision: five out, yada, yada. Last year, at some point during our 13 game losing streak, he moved Young to the starting five. With promising results IMO. It lasted 2 games.
So there's a chance Williams is seen as a fix to our overall softness with the Beran/Nance combo inside. Without actually moving Nance away from the 5. Positionless ball and all, you replace Kopp with more rebounding and toughness and you hope to not get killed on the boards as you were last year.
Anyway, about Williams, this is what I wrote in another thread when he transferred:
"From the fact he does shoot well, but not a lot, from three, I am assuming he is a 3/4. I don't care his numbers go down as he plays in the B1G. As long as he brings toughness, experience, he can contribute. I look at a comparable, Brandon Johnson (6'8 F) from MN:
-Last year at Western Michigan: 15.4/8.1
-At Minnesota: 8.9/6.3
Our dude:
-At FD: 13.9/7.6
-At Johnson's decrease rate, his projected NU numbers: 8.0/5.9
I'll take those stats."
Don't underestimate, mid major or not, the fact he's a 5th year senior. How much that brings, versus new blood, in terms of toughness/body strength, or experience in finding where you fit. How much better decisions you make, know your limitations, etc, etc. I would not be shocked to see Williams getting 25 minutes a night.
Edit: The big difference between the Williams and Johnson situation is that Johnson came into a Gopher roster that was very very short. It has a strong core of Carr/Robbins/Kalscheur, but it had no depth. So he had to play. Williams is looking at a significantly deeper roster
Well you and I have been on the same page with Nance and Young being the core. All the evidence bears that out. If Coach Collins refuses to play to his team's advantages, his team will underachieve again.
I don't deny that Collins may insist on playing Nance, Beran and (because those guys are finesse players) add Williams for some toughness.
But Williams is not as good as Miller Kopp and pairing Nance with Beran was a disaster last year. The lineup stats bear this out quite clearly. Nance and Beran are both 4's and they didn't work well together.
So, to me, if Williams is playing a lot, its actually a bad thing for our fortunes, an indication that Simmons is not getting it done or the coach is still clinging to that approach that you described above (positionless players). I'm okay with the philosophy, but it is meant for teams with superb athletes, and we are built like a traditional Big Ten team.
Regarding your transfer from Western Michigan - that league, the MAC, is decidedly better than that weak conference where Fairleigh Dickinson labors. NU was about 7 points better than the average MAC team last year, but the average MAC team was 7 points better than the average NEC team. And Fairleigh Dickinson was average in the NEC. So I'd guess Williams is good for 40-50% of his NEC numbers, or about 6-7 ppg and 3-4 rpg if he is playing 25 minutes a night.
I'm not trying to trash Williams, I just think our other players are more talented.