Re: have to disagree on that one....I'm tired of "tiger tv".....in what
Originally posted by Popeer:
I admit to being a fan of Tiger the golfer, but I find it funny that before a tournament the same people who salivate over the name Tiger Woods will write/say that he's done ... and then as soon as he shoots a round under par they write/say "he's b-a-a-c-k!!!" Love him or hate him, Woods generates viewers/listeners, and that's all they care about.
There is clearly a segment of the golf media who believes Woods is "done".....if not necessarily as a competitive player but as a Majors contender. I myself think a fair case can be made that "starting over" again at 40.....with a now ongoing history of physical problems.....will likely keep Tiger from re-approaching the dominator status to which we all grew accustomed.
But I also think it's hazardous for his opponents (both on and off the course) to forget how much pure juice this guy has; and if his health continues to stabilize, to dismiss as a Major competitor. Besides, it's no secret that majors (and sometimes multiple majors) can be won by players in their 40's.
In retrospect, my biggest ongoing question about Woods.....and I'm not the only one asking it...... remains how much of his outrageous success was the product of his actual game (which, by anyone's standards was amazing) versus the intimidation factor for which he took borderline-incredible advantage during his heyday.
You might not get any of his competitors to answer that question candidly; so I'd like to pose it to some Tour caddies (like his first guy, Fluff Cowan.....his current guy, Joe LaCava, who caddied all those years for Freddie Couples....or even his longest-time on-course bodyguard, Stevie Williams).