Great Economic Numbers Out Today

[wvu2007]

211,000 Jobs Added

http://www.breitbart.com/news/us-employers-add-strong-211000-jobs-unemployment-4-4-pct/

 

[Mntneer]

211,000 Jobs Added

http://www.breitbart.com/news/us-employers-add-strong-211000-jobs-unemployment-4-4-pct/

Thanks Trumbama! [thumbsup]



Just covering all bases.

 

[WVPATX]

211,000 Jobs Added

http://www.breitbart.com/news/us-employers-add-strong-211000-jobs-unemployment-4-4-pct/

We need more jobs than this. Hopefully, once we get tax reductions and repatriation of overseas profits, the kind of job growth we need will happen.

 

[D. Denzil Finney]

We need more jobs than this. Hopefully, once we get tax reductions and repatriation of overseas profits, the kind of job growth we need will happen.

Leading questions asked about this subject for the last eight years.

1. How many people are still unemployed?

2., How many have quit looking for jobs?

These have been asked ad nauseum over the that time period.

 

[mule_eer]

Leading questions asked about this subject for the last eight years.

1. How many people are still unemployed?

2., How many have quit looking for jobs?

These have been asked ad nauseum over the that time period.

How many are underemployed?

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

lowest unemployment numbers in TEN years...

https://www.reuters.tv/v/SPc/2017/0...urce=tw&utm_term=SocialFlow&utm_medium=social

 

[WVPATX]

I don't like U3 unemployment as a measure of employment. I much prefer U6, because it includes those that quit looking for work and those working part time that want full time work. The good news is that U6 is down significantly under Trump to 8.6%. We are also seeing some upward pressure on wages.

http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate_u6.jsp

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[Bulya]

211,000 Jobs Added

http://www.breitbart.com/news/us-employers-add-strong-211000-jobs-unemployment-4-4-pct/

You lost me at the breitbart link. Send me the WSJ or something believable.

 

[CAJUNEER_rivals]

You lost me at the breitbart link. Send me the WSJ or something believable.

This link should be right up your alley...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment.html?_r=0

 

[dave]

You lost me at the breitbart link. Send me the WSJ or something believable.

I am always amazed when some moron ignores a new article that states officially released data because of the articles publisher. Just look up the numbers on whatever govt website who pays your bills, it is the same data.

 

[wvu2007]

You lost me at the breitbart link. Send me the WSJ or something believable.

No thanks. Find your own links sissy boy.

 

[Bulya]

No thanks. Find your own links sissy boy.

You can call me many things but definitely not sissy boy. Old School Blue Lot "like to fight guy" in the Dairy Mar parking Lot!

 

[Bulya]

I am always amazed when some moron ignores a new article that states officially released data because of the articles publisher. Just look up the numbers on whatever govt website who pays your bills, it is the same data.

dave, dave, dave now why would I click on a link to that website to give them any traffic? Sorry I prefer economic news from a "reputable" source like the WSJ. I didn't criticize your daddy Donald just mentioned that trash website don't let that russle your jimmies.