I say UK -1.5.
I say UK -1.5.
Noledynasty2490
The Battles's End Collective Member
The Battle's End enables FSU athletes to maximize the value of their NIL. Click Here to Sign Up
Indiana is a level below UNC and we had them the entire game only to lose by 3. Same situation tomorrow but lessor opponent, it should be a Cats win 9 times out of 10 even with as bad as we’ve been. Indiana isn’t MSU or Gonzaga, not even close.Not sure I'll be able to stomach a IU beatdown
Indiana is not a level below UNC. The IU I watched play Louisville would beat UNC 8 out of 10 times and they will beat Kentucky if we do not contain their 3 point shooters.Indiana is a level below UNC and we had them the entire game only to lose by 3. Same situation tomorrow but lessor opponent, it should be a Cats win 9 times out of 10 even with as bad as we’ve been. Indiana isn’t MSU or Gonzaga, not even close.
Wilkinson shoots over 40% from 3. We will need to play him aggressively.Indiana is not a level below UNC. The IU I watched play Louisville would beat UNC 8 out of 10 times and they will beat Kentucky if we do not contain their 3 point shooters.
They got the doors blown off by Louisville just like we did, down huge the entire game and at the end cut it just below 10. And lost to 5-5 Minnesota. The same Minnesota Purdue beat by 28.Indiana is not a level below UNC. The IU I watched play Louisville would beat UNC 8 out of 10 times and they will beat Kentucky if we do not contain their 3 point shooters.
IU fan here.They got the doors blown off by Louisville just like we did, down huge the entire game and at the end cut it just below 10. And lost to 5-5 Minnesota. The same Minnesota Purdue beat by 28.
Sorry, good post and good insight. But I can't get over the name "KatScratch" as an IU fan.IU fan here.
This IU team is undersized, not especially athletic, and has little offense going to the rim or defensive rim protection. They live and die from three, and depend on excellent ball movement and execution to get looks.
This IU team is way, way more enjoyable than Woodson or Archie era teams because they consistently play hard, have really good body language and seem to like their teammates, and have a modern offense. And Enright is one of the chippiest undersized players in the country; draws frustration offensive fouls all the time - he will almost be guaranteed to piss you guys off in the game thread.
- When they get those things, they have a bunch of good shooters and two really good shooters (Wilkerson and Tucker D) and can blow out mid or worse-level Power 5 teams like Marquette, KState, Baylor in an exhibition, and Penn State.
- When they don't execute and move the ball? The weaknesses get exposed, they look slow and untalenetd, and a crap team like Minnesota can beat them going away.
Hope both schools eventually right the ship - it's been too long since they were both national powers.
Long story - nothing to do with college sports (or Karl Anthony Towns lol).Sorry, good post and good insight. But I can't get over the name "KatScratch" as an IU fan.
I did this against UNC and made some good money.Once again I hammered IU moneyline. Hope I’m wrong, but +175 was too good to pass up after what we’ve seen thus far from UK.
Same, vs Gonzaga.I did this against UNC and made some good money.
Feels dirty but I might do it again.
same, i did it in the louisville and msu game too, ive made over 400 dollarsI did this against UNC and made some good money.
Feels dirty but I might do it again.
Which bet is the “money line”? TIAOnce again I hammered IU moneyline. Hope I’m wrong, but +175 was too good to pass up after what we’ve seen thus far from UK.
Straight up. No spread. Just who wins.Which bet is the “money line”? TIA