I'll go to my grave knowing that UK should have hired Howard away from UL instead of Curry in '89, and in not doing so we pissed away a ton of entertaining wins & at least 1 SEC Championship in the 1990's.
Hold on now.
Not saying Schnellenberger wouldn't have done well, but let's look at the teams that won SEC Championships in the 90s and what kind of program/coach UK and Schnell were then.
UK: historically **** program, no recruiting base, no expectations of winning
Schnellenberger- clearly a great program builder, but look what happened when he moved to a big conference with OU in '95. UK would have likely improved and been on a much better foundation (as compared to Mumme) but I doubt it would have been enough to quickly overtake:
1990- UT (probably the weakest of the following group, but pretty sure UK wasn't going to win the SEC in Schellenberger's first year)
1991- Hey! It's Spurrier vs. Schnelly! 2 second year coaches! Only UK had a roster that, even with some sophomores maybe that were good if we all of a sudden started pulling Miami's recruits away, went 3-8 (0-7).
1992- Alabama. This team won the national title. Pretty sure they would beat a 3rd year CHS team.
1993--96- Steve Spurrier (Optimus Prime Edition). Again, maybe we don't lose 73-0, but that was a rolling program.
1997- UT, Peyton Manning's SR year. We lost 59-21 with Tim Couch and were cheating pretty good by then.
1998- UT, and this team won the national title as well. Nope.
1999- Alabama, I dunno, maybe Shaun Alexander comes to UK and we're rolling by then. But still had a thin roster that lost to Syracuse in the MCB that year.
Again- I agree that UK football would have improved and it would have been fun to see them do so by stealing UL's head coach, but generally speaking the SEC title gets won by a handful (6 teams have won it from 1990 through last year) of programs for a reason, and I don't think UK is vaulting those teams in 10 years in the 1990s.