Harvard makes ACT & SAT scores optional, yet we lose a recruit over it

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
25,932
1,416
113
I'm confused about what you are advocating. In one breath you acknowledge that NU makes exceptions for players that wouldn't have had a chance of getting admitted without exceptions made for athletes and then in the next you complain about "a country club attitude". NU already has lesser requirements for athletes (as do most other schools, including the Ivys.)

Is the issue here that you believe you know what it takes for a student-athlete to be successful at Northwestern better than the Admissions Department?
Look I fully realize my views of making MORE exceptions is not supported by a lot of people here. Especially Alums. I am not sure if you are really confused or just disagree. I absolutely believe that the program graduates players. More importantly, the players typically become productive members of society. Admissions denies applicants every single day for dozens of people that would have no problem being successful at NU. None!
 

AdamOnFirst

Senior
Nov 29, 2021
8,532
417
83
Look I fully realize my views of making MORE exceptions is not supported by a lot of people here. Especially Alums. I am not sure if you are really confused or just disagree. I absolutely believe that the program graduates players. More importantly, the players typically become productive members of society. Admissions denies applicants every single day for dozens of people that would have no problem being successful at NU. None!
What you're asking for isn't "more" exceptions, it's "even larger" exceptions.

It personally wouldn't bother me at all if they changed admission standards for athletes as long as we maintained our very high academic success rate. There is a end bound here at some point, obviously. Maybe they know they're already pushing right up against it, but that seems unlikely. It doesn't surprise me at all that the admissions dept of a university is full of people with their noses planted firmly inside their own asses.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
What you're asking for isn't "more" exceptions, it's "even larger" exceptions.

It personally wouldn't bother me at all if they changed admission standards for athletes as long as we maintained our very high academic success rate. There is a end bound here at some point, obviously. Maybe they know they're already pushing right up against it, but that seems unlikely. It doesn't surprise me at all that the admissions dept of a university is full of people with their noses planted firmly inside their own asses.

Eh. Actually probably is “more” instead of “larger,” but not a huge difference.
 

NUCat320

Senior
Dec 4, 2005
19,469
495
0
Is the issue here that you believe you know what it takes for a student-athlete to be successful at Northwestern better than the Admissions Department?

I believe that Fitz and staff know far better who is likely to succeed at NU (with success defined as ‘graduating’) than anybody in NU admissions.

Fitz has earned the trust to get in anybody he wants. My research indicates NU was 12th in 2006 and 14th in 2007. In Fitz we trust.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
I believe that Fitz and staff know far better who is likely to succeed at NU (with success defined as ‘graduating’) than anybody in NU admissions.

Fitz has earned the trust to get in anybody he wants. My research indicates NU was 12th in 2006 and 14th in 2007. In Fitz we trust.
I respectfully disagree with your contention about Fitz and his staff as it relates to admissions. He's a swell dude, but he's a football coach.
 

NUCat320

Senior
Dec 4, 2005
19,469
495
0
I respectfully disagree with your contention about Fitz and his staff as it relates to admissions. He's a swell dude, but he's a football coach.

Virtually zero football players would get in to Northwestern if they weren’t football players. And yet they all graduate, or leave early for the NFL, or graduate *and* leave early for the NFL.
 

AdamOnFirst

Senior
Nov 29, 2021
8,532
417
83
Eh. Actually probably is “more” instead of “larger,” but not a huge difference.
No, it’s larger. Nearly every football player in the team is already given a very large exception, a totally different set of admissions criteria compared to any other applicant. They don’t reject an athlete because their quota is already met on exceptions, they reject an athlete because he doesn’t meet the exception standard either. So what you’re looking for is a larger exception, not more of them.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
25,932
1,416
113
No, it’s larger. Nearly every football player in the team is already given a very large exception, a totally different set of admissions criteria compared to any other applicant. They don’t reject an athlete because their quota is already met on exceptions, they reject an athlete because he doesn’t meet the exception standard either. So what you’re looking for is a larger exception, not more of them.
Every D1 school in the country in the country has exceptions. NU wouldn’t be able to field a D1 team without exceptions. Exactly what is NU’s sales pitch to a recruit? Is the history of winning, great game day atmosphere, student support etc? No it’s the education. The pitch should resonate with those athletes that use their football skills to get admitted that would have no chance n hell of getting admitted. Guess what, they graduate and become productive citizens.
 

Eurocat

Senior
May 29, 2001
17,843
590
113
I'm confused about what you are advocating. In one breath you acknowledge that NU makes exceptions for players that wouldn't have had a chance of getting admitted without exceptions made for athletes and then in the next you complain about "a country club attitude". NU already has lesser requirements for athletes (as do most other schools, including the Ivys.)

Is the issue here that you believe you know what it takes for a student-athlete to be successful at Northwestern better than the Admissions Department?

He is saying they are not less enough and not granted often enough.

Personally I think we should have Duke standards. Hasn't hurt them in the national academic rankings.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
No, it’s larger. Nearly every football player in the team is already given a very large exception, a totally different set of admissions criteria compared to any other applicant. They don’t reject an athlete because their quota is already met on exceptions, they reject an athlete because he doesn’t meet the exception standard either. So what you’re looking for is a larger exception, not more of them.

There are already a few “exceptions” to those lowered requirements every year. Trust me on this one.
 
May 29, 2001
2,860
28
0
I'm confused about what you are advocating. In one breath you acknowledge that NU makes exceptions for players that wouldn't have had a chance of getting admitted without exceptions made for athletes and then in the next you complain about "a country club attitude". NU already has lesser requirements for athletes (as do most other schools, including the Ivys.)

Is the issue here that you believe you know what it takes for a student-athlete to be successful at Northwestern better than the Admissions Department?

The University of Chicago makes exceptions, other elite D3s make exceptions, the Ivys make exceptions. Just went through this process with my son. Couldn't care less if NU does as long as athletes graduate.
 

Koldfire

Redshirt
Sep 15, 2012
558
0
0
Virtually zero football players would get in to Northwestern if they weren’t football players. And yet they all graduate, or leave early for the NFL, or graduate *and* leave early for the NFL.
"Virtually zero" isn't accurate. There are several players who qualified academically for admissions to NU.
 

NUCat320

Senior
Dec 4, 2005
19,469
495
0
"Virtually zero" isn't accurate. There are several players who qualified academically for admissions to NU.
Point is, among the students who were accepted only because they were football players with a Fitzdorsement, there is a near-100% graduation rate. (We can’t know this for sure — we can only guess.)

Graduation rate of ‘unqualified’ football players significantly outpaces that of the student population at large.

One cannot make a logic-based argument that ~20 students a year who meet only NCAA minimum athlete requirements will harm the university in any way. After all, they tend to graduate.

NU football has, for 15 years, identified, advocated for, supported, and graduated football players at NCAA-best (and, I’d imagine, all-time university-best) rates.

NU football has proven it deserves maximum leeway.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
:):)

True, but we have a starter who is in medical school and one who scored in the 98th percentile on the M-Cats, as well as many other academic high achievers.

Gerak was reportedly a 4.2 GPA and 34 ACT. Skoronski was a 4.9 weighted and was in the same ballpark on the ACT.

While Northwestern chooses not to publish GPA information in its Common Data Set, the middle half (I.e. 25th/75th) for ACT was 33/35 and for SAT was 1430/1540. It’s almost comically difficult to get into NU right now.

 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
NU football has proven it deserves maximum leeway.

I don't think that's actually the case. NU football has proven that what it has been doing has been working. That's not an argument to change what has been working. That's an argument to continue what has been working. I'm happy to hear an argument for what would be more successful that isn't "whatever Fitz wants".
 

NUCat320

Senior
Dec 4, 2005
19,469
495
0
I'm happy to hear an argument for what would be more successful that isn't "whatever Fitz wants".
NU football continues its deliberate, relationship-based approach to giving offers. Early contact to prepare recruits on the requirements, active discussions with people beyond just coaches and parents who know the student. Offers continue to be infrequent.

But, if a student has met the NCAA’s standards, AND the NU football staff’s standards, then admissions lets them in.

Again, NU graduates everyone. NU’s academic ranking has improved with the consistency of the football program.

Now you go. What are the risks associated with loosening admissions restrictions? Use examples.
 
Last edited:

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
NU football continues its deliberate, relationship-based approach to giving offers. Early contact to prepare recruits on the requirements, active discussions with people beyond just coaches and parents who know the student. Offers continue to be infrequent.

But, if a student has met the NCAA’s standards, AND the NU football staff’s standards, then admissions lets them in.

Again, NU graduates everyone. NU’s academic ranking has improved with the consistency of the football program.

Now you go. What are the risks associated with loosening admissions restrictions? Use examples.

I'm happy to hear an argument for what would be more successful that isn't "whatever Fitz wants".

Repeating points that you've already made doesn't make it a new suggestion. Your proposal is "whatever Fitz wants". And you haven't even started by identifying what the current exceptions are and why they are insufficient. I love Fitz and am IN FAVOR of loosening GPA and testing requirements to enroll more extraordinary applicants who have demonstrated incredible ability, work ethic, and achievement in other areas. "Whatever Fitz wants" isn't a system to get Northwestern there reliably.
 
Last edited:

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
Repeating points that you've already made doesn't make it a new suggestion. Your proposal is "whatever Fitz wants". And you haven't even started by identifying what the current exceptions are and why they are insufficient. I love Fitz and am IN FAVOR of loosening GPA and testing requirements for to enroll more extraordinary applicants who have demonstrated incredible ability, work ethic, and achievement in other areas. "Whatever Fitz wants" isn't a system to get Northwestern there reliably.

It is if you believe Fitz understands Northwestern (seems pretty clear) and values his team’s academic performance (also seems pretty clear). I’m very confident that Fitz wouldn’t run to the lowest common denominator if his restrictions were lifted because he values the culture of the team so much.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
It is if you believe Fitz understands Northwestern (seems pretty clear) and values his team’s academic performance (also seems pretty clear). I’m very confident that Fitz wouldn’t run to the lowest common denominator if his restrictions were lifted because he values the culture of the team so much.
I am very confident in that, too, but that's not a system and I'm sure you know that.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
I am very confident in that, too, but that's not a system and I'm sure you know that.

Why does there need to be a “system?” There aren’t really any hard limits or quotas in the current setup, all recruits are considered on a case-by-case basis.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
Why does there need to be a “system?” There aren’t really any hard limits or quotas in the current setup, all recruits are considered on a case-by-case basis.
Why does there need to be a system for why students are accepted to a university? Really?
 

Curdog7

Freshman
Jun 22, 2001
2,683
50
35
Repeating points that you've already made doesn't make it a new suggestion. Your proposal is "whatever Fitz wants". And you haven't even started by identifying what the current exceptions are and why they are insufficient. I love Fitz and am IN FAVOR of loosening GPA and testing requirements for to enroll more extraordinary applicants who have demonstrated incredible ability, work ethic, and achievement in other areas. "Whatever Fitz wants" isn't a system to get Northwestern there reliably.
Fitz has clearly shown he knows what it takes to graduate players. Literally no other coach in the country is better. He has earned the right to have more latitude. If graduation rate goes down, then that latitude should be removed. It’s really not that hard.

And I think you mean “criteria” when you say “system”. Admissions makes judgement calls all the time. That is their job. There isn’t a hard set method.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
Cool. I'll look elsewhere for ideas about how this might be accomplished.

I‘m genuinely interested in what you meant — a sliding scale akin to NCAA minimums just recalibrated for NU, hard minimum scores, a process for screening kids, something else?
 

Gladeskat

All-Conference
Feb 16, 2004
116,622
1,805
113
lol it's cute that you think we'd be able to recruit 3 one-and-done basketball players every year.

Minuscule change does not lead to the end of life as we know it. Sean Dockery was a partial qualifier who not only got admitted to Duke, he stayed for four years; I'm sure their football team has brought in and graduated "special" students as well. And yet despite these ghastly exceptions, Duke is still No. 9 in the US News Rankings, tied with... omg they're tied with Northwestern! (But how??? That's impossible!!!)

Even just 5 yearly exceptions for football and 1 for basketball -- with players who are committed to making it work at NU both athletically and academically -- would likely yield a massive improvement to our squads, if for no other reason than it increases our access to talent. And it most certainly wouldn't impact our overall institution.

No dimbulbs.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
Fitz has clearly shown he knows what it takes to graduate players. Literally no other coach in the country is better. He has earned the right to have more latitude. If graduation rate goes down, then that latitude should be removed. It’s really not that hard.

And I think you mean “criteria” when you say “system”. Admissions makes judgement calls all the time. That is their job. There isn’t a hard set method.
Appreciate that clarification, curdog. I do think criteria would generally be a large part of a successful system. And I have to imagine that it would involve cooperative efforts between admissions and the football program. There are already criteria in place and admissions and football already work together to make judgement calls on prospective student-athletes, so what some are seeking is changes to that in some way.

But what I see some people doing here is insisting that the criteria/system must be changed without much knowledge about what the existing criteria/system are or what they would advocate they be changed to. They are seeking an outcome (better football players who are able to be successful academically at Northwestern) without any sense of how to get there or how to insure it goes well. It's like a four-year who wants a pony. They don't care which one, what it costs, who is going to take care of it, or what happens when they get tired of it. All they know is THEY WANT IT.
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
Appreciate that clarification, curdog. I do think criteria would generally be a large part of a successful system. And I have to imagine that it would involve cooperative efforts between admissions and the football program. There are already criteria in place and admissions and football already work together to make judgement calls on prospective student-athletes, so what some are seeking is changes to that in some way.

But what I see some people doing here is insisting that the criteria/system must be changed without much knowledge about what the existing criteria/system are or what they would advocate they be changed to. They are seeking an outcome (better football players who are able to be successful academically at Northwestern) without any sense of how to get there or how to insure it goes well. It's like a four-year who wants a pony. They don't care which one, what it costs, who is going to take care of it, or what happens when they get tired of it. All they know is THEY WANT IT.

I’ll probably get scolded by certain posters for playing the insider card, but I can tell you all about the current system (or at least how it was a while back). It was literally my job.

The current “system” is basically as you describe, a collaborative effort between the staff and admissions without hard minimums.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
25,932
1,416
113
Appreciate that clarification, curdog. I do think criteria would generally be a large part of a successful system. And I have to imagine that it would involve cooperative efforts between admissions and the football program. There are already criteria in place and admissions and football already work together to make judgement calls on prospective student-athletes, so what some are seeking is changes to that in some way.

But what I see some people doing here is insisting that the criteria/system must be changed without much knowledge about what the existing criteria/system are or what they would advocate they be changed to. They are seeking an outcome (better football players who are able to be successful academically at Northwestern) without any sense of how to get there or how to insure it goes well. It's like a four-year who wants a pony. They don't care which one, what it costs, who is going to take care of it, or what happens when they get tired of it. All they know is THEY WANT IT.
Okay, but you seem to take an approach that whatever is being done is working so why change it? You also have zero idea whether lowering the GPA scale a tenth of a point or reducing minimum test scores some small number will result in less academic sucess. None of us do. You can’t be wrong in your position because it has never been tested!

I’ll change over to your side if the evidence shows NU recruiting either knuckleheads or players that don’t put in the effort to succeed off the field. For now I’ll take the pony.
 

No Chores

Junior
Jul 2, 2006
6,533
254
83
If I understand him correctly, gcg is saying each case is an individual one. There could be no better example than the recent DL commit and de-commit. One did not make the academic grade or test score needed and one did. There are no firm criteria or academic standards, and the coaching staff has to evaluate the whole package, including character. How am I doing gcg?
 

Gocatsgo2003

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2006
45,569
1,604
78
If I understand him correctly, gcg is saying each case is an individual one. There could be no better example than the recent DL commit and de-commit. One did not make the academic grade or test score needed and one did. There are no firm criteria or academic standards, and the coaching staff has to evaluate the whole package, including character. How am I doing gcg?

Essentially, yeah. Both art and science, but a little more art.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
I’ll probably get scolded by certain posters for playing the insider card, but I can tell you all about the current system (or at least how it was a while back). It was literally my job.

The current “system” is basically as you describe, a collaborative effort between the staff and admissions without hard minimums.

Thanks for weighing in with that. That's the experience we had with my son in his conversations with a few high academic schools, but it wasn't football.

Assuming that's still the case, I'm struggling to understand the idea some people (not you) are advocating that lowering minimums that aren't hard minimums to begin with are a solution to the problem.
 

hoosboot

All-American
Nov 7, 2001
26,893
6,534
0
Okay, but you seem to take an approach that whatever is being done is working so why change it? You also have zero idea whether lowering the GPA scale a tenth of a point or reducing minimum test scores some small number will result in less academic sucess. None of us do. You can’t be wrong in your position because it has never been tested!

I’ll change over to your side if the evidence shows NU recruiting either knuckleheads or players that don’t put in the effort to succeed off the field. For now I’ll take the pony.
It's hard to discuss this with you seriously when you don't read what people actually type and assign positions to them that they don't actually take.
I love Fitz and am IN FAVOR of loosening GPA and testing requirements to enroll more extraordinary applicants who have demonstrated incredible ability, work ethic, and achievement in other areas.
You're so obsessed with arguing that you can't see that I also would like Northwestern to rely less on GPA and testing requirements for admissions for athletes who demonstrate otherwise the ability to succeed in the classroom at Northwestern.
 
Last edited:

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
25,932
1,416
113
It's hard to discuss this with you seriously when you don't read what people actually type and assign positions to them that they don't actually take.

You're so obsessed with arguing that you can't see that I also would like Northwestern to rely less on GPA and testing requirements for admissions for athletes who demonstrate otherwise the ability to succeed in the classroom at Northwestern.
You talk about a system and even the guy that was in the recruiting office couldn’t interpret your concern. Maybe you talk in circles?