I have always liked to eat these. Does this mean I'm gay?
I think it might. Eating these is now on par with having your right ear pierced in the 90s.
[laughing]
Have you seen the new Doritos?
- Thread starter KingOfBBN
- Start date
I think it might. Eating these is now on par with having your right ear pierced in the 90s.
[laughing]
It's the gay agenda to turn my kids *****. Also, look at Froot Loops. It's everywhere. University of Hawaii nuthin but a bunch of left wing anti white pillow biters. Don't even get me going on that gay purple dinosaur or the four multicolored gay alien hobbits with tv antennas on their gay heads. Where will it end? I guess when the lord returns or no more babies are born.I have always liked to eat these. Does this mean I'm gay?
I bought a bag and instantly banged two dudes.
Weird.
Damn sinful Doritos.
Weird.
Damn sinful Doritos.
Another industry (Big Corn Chip) capitulating to a special interest group. There you go, Doritos, pandering to creationists:
When will the pandering end?
When will the pandering end?
Another industry (Big Corn Chip) capitulating to a special interest group. There you go, Doritos, pandering to creationists:
When will the pandering end?
There wasn't one damn bag of chips on that ark.
Last edited:
do we have time to discussion your avatar then? maybe you would like to explain why you like that bizarre looking caricature with the reverse directed erect penis and scrotum protruding from between his butt cheeks? And why you super-imposed a UK football helmet on the critter, who doesn't seem to be smiling, stiffened armed, arched back . . . these are combined elements that you like and want other people to know about, yes? And what are those dots? Just like you wrote, "little dude is gay." Now maybe without making assumptions about children who are not able to defend themselves why not just go ahead and come out and discuss what you really need to talk about. Open up. Share.
NO TIME TO DISCUSSION THE DICKBUTT. DICKBUTT WILL NOT BE DISCUSSIONED HERE OR ANYWHERE FOR DICKBUTT IS NOT UP FOR DISCUSSIONS. THANK YOU. NEXT QUESTION.
I for one certainly did not know that. But I do know that it is a tendency among gay people to assume that other persons are familiar with things that they are interested in, so I will assume that you are gay. Naturally, you - as an adult - will not have any problem with my assumption, as you have openly (and very unethically I might add) made an assumption about the sexuality of a small child - based on observations of your own. Further, because that child, the virtues of whom you've chosen to assail for the benefit of Frito-Lay, parent company PepsiCo., and your fellow adult gays, has very unlikely at this point in his life engaged in any form of sexual behavior, I will further assume that the forms of sexual behavior that you have engaged in are very much in keeping with the "rather famous internet meme" name you've shared. Again, because you've drawn a small child's sexuality into this discussion I will assume that you are receptive to similar assumptions about your own. How are we coming along on those 10 pages, Jason?
Lolll that's the gayest post I didn't finish reading. Poor effort, tbh.
oh, but guess what? I wasn't talking to you. I was replying to a person who feels comfortable making assumptions about the sexuality of young boys during early to middle childhood development, and a staunch defender of the corporate agenda to market products to homosexuals. Assailer of children's virtues. Defender of major corporations who pander to gays. That is the person I was talking to. Not you. But thank you for your kind observation. Please let me know if I can clarify my communication again. Be happy to.
IT'S A EUROPEAN CARRYALL! I'VE GOT ONE! IT IS NOT GAY AND IT IS FABULOUS!
Good, that means I did not offend you with my conclusion that you are gay. Which also means I can ask a follow-up question without offending you any further. Here is the question:
Do you feel that because you are gay you are allowed to draw conclusions about the sexuality of small children without moral infraction?
I think it has to do with how homos define their entire personality around their sexual orientation, so it would make sense to make products that specifically appeal to the only defining characteristic of their being.
Grew up with this kid in EKY. He was gay from the jump. Adults and other kids just assumed he was feminine. No one ever said, "you think he might be gay?" He always hung out with a group of girls but he played basketball all the way through high school, loved fishing, HUGE nascar fan/racing fan in general and still is to this day. But he also loved Celine Dion, musicals, and boys. Never came out until he moved away. But he was gay from day 1. I know it had to be hard on him.
I recently found out what happened to a guy I went to school with. He was different from day one but it wasn't something specific. He was a smart, funny, outgoing kid who did every club and activity and could claim every other kid as a friend. He was active in a youth preaching contest and the most active in his youth group. I met some of his family recently that told me he is married to a man and they run a cafe together. His parents think he never met the right girl and has his business partner for a roommate because of scheduling issues. Never underestimate the power of denial.
to make assumptions about the future sexuality of a present-day child is to take liberty with their remaining innocence and virtues, and yes, I would consider that immoral. In this case, the person I'm conversing with did so for the benefit of defending Frito Lay's marketing technique to gays. Why? I think it's been established that he (Jason) is gay, and he feels that he is entitled to take liberties with the child's innocence and virtues because he (Jason) is gay.
Also, the persons joking around about what the small child might one day do sexually should be absolutely ashamed of themselves. What is to restrict them then from selecting some random 6 or 7 year old girl and making the same vulgar comment about her? A child is a child. Absolutely horrible thing to say. Absolutely horrible to acknowledge with a gif of laughing ***-clowns.
Would you have a problem if he assumed the kid was heterosexual?