Michigan to big of fish to fry. Iowa is irrelevant so this was an easy call. Surprised anyone cared what Iowa did or does to get their 7-8 wins each seasonHow bout Michigan and Hausman
Yes they were.Weren’t they also tampering with that 5 star OL from Alabama a few years back?
Iowa should just tell the NCAA ‘how about no’ at this point until all schools are held accountable.
I was just in the bathroom at Walmart. Smelled like Iowa. You know. Like the whole state.Nebraska game still counts.
Admiring 8 win seasons and not titles? LameI dislike Iowa fans- but admire their coaches and team results.
However what a joke the NCAA is picking on Iowa-, its like littering for them. When LSU and Mississippi are committing mass murder in comparison. The NCAA leaves the SEC and blue bloods alone for the most part.
Who tf goes to the bathroom at Walmart lolI was just in the bathroom at Walmart. Smelled like Iowa. You know. Like the whole state.
Clarkeye fans in Omaha.Who tf goes to the bathroom at Walmart lol
It is enforced evenly. One word: evidence. The enforcement staff has to establish actual evidence that tampering occurred. Once proof is established, the case can be taken to the Infraction Committee to mete out penalties.In all honesty if the NCAA wants to stop being a laughing stock then they have a lot more than Iowa to worry about with tampering. I’m quite sure almost every from the major conferences tamper. The NCAA needs to stop picking and choosing when to enforce rules or how to enforce rules…
I think Tampering should be punished, but only if it’s enforced evenly with all teams.
Did you happen to ever guest lecture at any B1G institutions? I sat in on one a few years ago, and this take brought up the memory of listening to himIt is enforced evenly. One word: evidence. The enforcement staff has to establish actual evidence that tampering occurred. Once proof is established, the case can be taken to the Infraction Committee to mete out penalties.
This type of case has nothing to do with Michigan or any other situation that doesn't involve players playing while ineligible. Vacation ONLY occurs when a student-athlete competes while ineligible. There was no ineligible participation in the Michigan case (contrast it with Reggie Bush/USC and Notre Dame's academic fraud case in which players participated after some slut did their homework). Once Iowa committed a rules violation in the recruitment of McNamara, the violation rendered him ineligible to play at Iowa (and only at Iowa). Therefore, any games he played in after being rendered ineligible and before his eligibility was restored have to be vacated.
Vacation is not an empty penalty. I worked for many years in college athletics. Coaches have huge egos. You take away wins based on violations they committed and they go crazy. Many vacation cases are appealed. If vacation was an empty penalty, there wouldn't be appeals.
I completely agree with the eligibility issues you’re talking about, however Michigan, and pretty much every other school has ineligible players due to tampering. The biggest issue with anyone of us like you said with the evidence… but you and anyone else who would believe that tampering isn’t going on with almost every school is just blatantly ignoring the obvious and you’re part of that problem… head coaches at many schools have came out and complained about schools tampering with their players, players coming out saying schools contacted them, yet you never see the schools who are constantly competing receiver any kind of sanctions, even if it is vacating wins. The NCAA has turned a blind eye to cheating for a lot schools now for years. It is a corrupt governing agency that serves absolutely no purpose any more since it refuses to govern evenly.It is enforced evenly. One word: evidence. The enforcement staff has to establish actual evidence that tampering occurred. Once proof is established, the case can be taken to the Infraction Committee to mete out penalties.
This type of case has nothing to do with Michigan or any other situation that doesn't involve players playing while ineligible. Vacation ONLY occurs when a student-athlete competes while ineligible. There was no ineligible participation in the Michigan case (contrast it with Reggie Bush/USC and Notre Dame's academic fraud case in which players participated after some slut did their homework). Once Iowa committed a rules violation in the recruitment of McNamara, the violation rendered him ineligible to play at Iowa (and only at Iowa). Therefore, any games he played in after being rendered ineligible and before his eligibility was restored have to be vacated.
Vacation is not an empty penalty. I worked for many years in college athletics. Coaches have huge egos. You take away wins based on violations they committed and they go crazy. Many vacation cases are appealed. If vacation was an empty penalty, there wouldn't be appeals.